| Noteworthy News Articles on Mental Health Topics, November 27-31, 2001
Postpartum Depression Cited in Virginia Killing
Tom Jackman, Washington Post- 11/27/2001
A new Springfield mother stabbed her husband to death Saturday afternoon, then stabbed
herself, apparently in a fit of postpartum depression, according to court papers filed
yesterday. The couple's 10-week-old daughter was sleeping upstairs and was uninjured. Eric
and Seema Rothstein both worked in the Fairfax County school system, where they had met
about eight years ago while teaching at Lane Elementary School in Kingstowne. Eric
Rothstein, 36, was most recently a computer trainer for teachers and students at Fairhill
and Navy elementary schools and was the boys' crew coach at Thomas Jefferson High School
for Science and Technology. Seema G. Rothstein, 32, is a graduate of West Springfield High
School and the University of Virginia, according to a friend, Tracy Johnston. She teaches
fourth grade at Bonnie Brae Elementary School but had taken time off for the birth of her
first child.
Last night, Seema Rothstein had not been arrested and was at Inova
Fairfax Hospital recovering from her wounds. Hospital officials declined to release her
condition. Fairfax police refused to discuss the case or even release the Rothsteins'
names. Seema Rothstein's family declined to comment. But an affidavit filed in support of
a search warrant said Seema Rothstein told police during a helicopter ride to the hospital
that she had hurt her husband and herself.
Neighbors in the 7400 block of Shepherd Ridge Court said they were
stunned by the sudden violence from the quiet couple. Johnston, a neighbor and longtime
friend of Seema Rothstein, was particularly shocked. "They're beautiful people, a
wonderful family," Johnston said. "There was no fighting between them. It wasn't
a domestic dispute. She was suffering from postpartum depression. He was a very loving
husband and father and very indulgent and patient of her anxiety." Johnston said she
spoke to Seema Rothstein several times daily. They last spoke about 30 minutes before the
stabbing, Johnston said.
Fairfax County police received a 911 call about 3:15 p.m. Saturday from
the home, according to the search warrant affidavit. No one spoke into the phone, but the
operator could hear someone crying and then heard a struggle. When officers arrived, they
could hear the Rothsteins' yellow Labrador retriever barking. The front door was locked,
and when the officers went around to the back, they found Seema Rothstein lying on the
deck with blood on her shirt and one arm. Looking inside, the officers saw Eric Rothstein
lying in the family room next to a large knife. "He had obviously been
murdered," homicide detective Steve Shillingford wrote in the affidavit. A helicopter
arrived to take Seema Rothstein to the hospital for treatment of stab wounds to her
stomach and forearm, police said. When an officer in the helicopter asked Seema Rothstein
what happened, she said "she had hurt herself," the affidavit states. When the
officer asked whether anyone else was hurt, Seema Rothstein "indicated she had hurt
her husband and that she was on medication."
"All around, it's just a tragedy," Johnston said. She said
the Rothsteins dated for about a year, then married about seven years ago. Johnston said
the Rothsteins were thrilled when they learned of Seema's pregnancy this year. "They
were both extraordinary teachers," said Helene Brower, principal at Lane Elementary,
where the couple taught until they were engaged. "They spent a lot of time with
children way beyond the school hours. They were very organized and very committed."
Eric Rothstein graduated from Michigan State University, where he took
up rowing. In a journal posted on the Thomas Jefferson Web site, he wrote, "This
sport has become such a huge part of my life that I cannot imagine what I would be doing
now had I not found rowing." While in graduate school at the University of Michigan,
he attended a job fair and got a teaching job in Fairfax County, which he had not heard of
before. He had coached at Jefferson since 1992 and was The Washington Post's All-Met Coach
of the Year in 1996. "A lot of people looked to him for tips and information,
including myself," said Ron Lim, a longtime co-coach and friend. "He was
genuinely a very good guy."
Depression Screening Urged for New Moms
Karen Mellen, Chicago Tribune- 11/27/2001
Despite increased attention on postpartum depression over the past few years, the
number of women screened and then referred for treatment has not increased significantly,
a national expert on the disorder says. That's why it is so important for all social
workers, nurses and doctors to be trained to look for symptoms of depression among women
who have recently given birth, says Dr. Laura Miller, associate professor of psychiatry at
the University of Illinois at Chicago. "The frustrating thing is it's difficult to
have time to do the screening," Miller says. "Clinicians have to screen for
everything." Miller says that although postpartum depression is highly treatable,
untreated depression can have long-lasting effects on mother and baby. The severity of the
symptoms increases with time and can lead to problems for the baby, she says.
Women whose depression is not treated can become suicidal or suffer
recurring bouts of depression later in life. Children can end up with lower IQs and
depression because of the neglect, either physical or emotional, by mothers who have a
mental disorder, she says. As a result, everyone who comes into contact with a family must
look for signs of depression, Miller says. But she cautions that the symptoms of
postpartum mental illnesses often are different from mental illness in the general
population. For instance, in the case of the more serious postpartum psychosis, women can
appear to be lucid for long periods of time, which can lead to their being released from
inpatient facilities or otherwise not being treated aggressively enough.
Society needs "the involvement of family and significant
others," says Miller, noting that clinicians should not rely only on the woman for
information. Scientists theorize that hormonal changes during pregnancy and soon
thereafter can trigger a chemical change that leads to depression. About 10 percent of
mothers will become depressed, they say.
Maryland Panel Urges Life Term for Some Sex Offenders
Maureen O'Hagan, Washington Post- 11/27/2001
Maryland officials are recommending life sentences for certain sex offenders with
untreatable personality disorders. The proposal, along with numerous other suggestions,
comes from a task force formed after a paroled rapist was charged with murdering a
9-year-old Frederick boy last fall. "We know in dealing with psychopaths [that] there
is no treatment that will work on them. They will forever repeat that conduct," said
Richard B. Rosenblatt, director of mental health for the state Department of Public Safety
and Correctional Services. "It's our feeling they ought to be removed from the public
at large since they will re-offend." But one year after the boy's death, the sex
offender conundrum seems just as vexing. Some of the panel's proposals have been
considered and rejected by lawmakers in years past. Others may be viewed as too costly in
a time of tight budgets. And still others, like the sentencing recommendations, are
untested and, task force members admit, controversial. "Everybody wants to do
something, but the question is how to do something that really works and doesn't mess an
already complex system up even worse," said Del. Sue Hecht (D-Frederick), who served
on the task force.
The case of Elmer Spencer Jr. brought the system's problems into sharp
focus. Spencer had a long history of violent behavior, much of it focused on young
children, and had served time for raping an 11-year-old Carroll County boy. On Nov. 14,
2000, Spencer was dropped off at a Frederick bus station after serving 3 1/2 years of a
10-year sentence for assault. He had no job, no place to live and few prospects of fitting
in with society. He had been deemed mildly retarded and likely to re-offend, yet he had
received no recent treatment geared toward sex offenses. Six days later, the body of
Christopher Lee Ausherman was discovered in a nearby baseball dugout, naked and bloody,
with evidence of sexual assault. Spencer is awaiting trial on murder charges.
The task force was formed by the state secretaries of public safety and
health and mental hygiene last spring after several lawmakers called for changes but the
General Assembly declined to act. The task force's most controversial recommendation is
that if a psychiatrist determines a sex offender to be psychopathic or have an anti-social
personality that would make it likely that more violent crimes could be committed --
diagnoses that have no effective treatment -- a judge could sentence the offender to life.
The sentence would be an option only upon a second sex crime conviction. The idea is
similar to a proposal by Hecht to allow mental hospitals to hold certain sex offenders
after their sentences, treating them until they are deemed to no longer be dangerous. That
proposal was rejected by the task force, but 16 states have enacted similar measures.
Among the panel's other recommendations:
All sex offenders should undergo psychiatric evaluations before sentencing and
before being released from jail.
A life sentence should be an option in more sex crime cases. The task force
recommends expanding the law to cover two-time offenders who have been deemed likely to
re-offend. Lawmakers rejected a similar proposal during this year's session.
Sex offenders should be prohibited from using credits that allow them to shorten
their prison sentences -- the sort of credits that helped Spencer reduce his 10-year
sentence by 6 1/2 years.
Treatment should be offered to sex offenders before they are released from jail.
Currently, only about 20 beds in the entire prison system are designated for such
treatment.
"A lot of discussion on the task force went into trying to
understand why people do what they do," Rosenblatt said. He said there are two
categories of sex offenders: those with anti-social personality disorders, and those with
sexual disorders they are unable to suppress, even though they may want to. Those in the
first group are untreatable and will almost certainly re-offend, Rosenblatt said, but the
latter may benefit from treatment. Many of the proposals require the approval of the
General Assembly, where, next year, money may present one of many obstacles. "Right
now, we're in sort of a budget shortfall," said W. Lawrence Fitch, director of
forensic services for the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. "That makes
more-expensive kinds of measures less realistic."
Help for Those Willing to Quit Smoking
New York Times, 11/27/2001
One might expect that smokers who decide to have themselves checked for lung cancer
with a CAT scan must also be giving some serious thought to giving up cigarettes. A new
study suggests that this may be the case--and urges the doctors who conduct the scans to
accompany them with advice to patients about ways to quit smoking.
Researchers from Weill Medical College of Cornell University and the
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center found that almost a quarter of smokers surveyed six
months after their scans reported having quit. Twenty-six percent more said they cut back,
the researchers report in the December issue of Preventive Medicine.
Dr. Jamie S. Ostroff, a psychologist at Sloan-Kettering and an author
of the study, said it was unclear how much the results of the scans contributed to the
decisions to quit. But she said some smokers quit even though the scans showed that their
lungs looked healthy. The findings, she said, suggest that still more smokers seeking sans
could be led to quit with the right counseling. "The ground here is fertile,"
Dr. Ostroff said, "and we know there are proven methods to help individuals to
quit."
The study looked at the experiences of 134 smokers who enrolled in the
Early Lung Cancer Action Program at Cornell. Dr. Claudia I. Henschke, a radiology
professor at Cornell and the senior author of the report, said she got the idea for the
study after some patients who had undergone the lung scans got in touch with her and said
they had given up smoking.
Sharpe's Fate Rests with Jury
Michele Kurtz, Boston Globe - 11/27/2001
LAWRENCE - A Superior Court jury held the fate of Dr. Richard Sharpe in its hands last
night, as it began deliberations to determine whether the Gloucester dermatologist was
insane when he killed his wife last year. The jury got the case yesterday afternoon after
hearing lengthy closing arguments from the defense and prosecution about Sharpe's state of
mind when he shot his estranged wife, Karen, in front of witnesses at her Wenham home.
Sharpe, 47, who mounted an insanity defense, is charged with first-degree murder. Judge
Christine M. McEvoy told jurors they also could consider returning a guilty verdict on the
lesser included charges of second-degree murder or manslaughter. The jury was sequestered
last night at a hotel and will resume deliberations this morning.
Prosecutors argued yesterday that Sharpe faked mental illness and
cunningly planned his wife's murder to later support the insanity defense. ''He sets it up
so you'll think he's temporarily insane,'' Essex Assistant District Attorney Robert Weiner
told jurors. ''He knew what he was doing was wrong,'' he added, noting the proof lay in
''all the secretive behavior, all the conscience of guilt, all the flight.''
But Joseph J. Balliro, one of Sharpe's attorneys, said the
cross-dressing millionaire doctor was tortured by the effects of childhood abuse. Balliro
argued that Sharpe suffered from mental illness that - combined with prescription drugs
and alcohol - had made him psychotic when he shot Karen Sharpe on July 14, 2000. ''You
have before you an individual who I suggest is about as crazy, about as insane as any
[homeless] person you would meet,'' said Balliro, who argued that his client was insane
and not criminally responsible for his wife's death.
Under the law, the burden falls on the prosecution to show that Sharpe
was sane at the time of the shooting. Sharpe's two-week trial, covered in its entirety by
Court TV, delved into the bizarre lifestyle of the successful doctor, who testified that
he took his wife's birth control pills and wore his daughter's panties to make him feel
safe. Jurors also learned that Sharpe had hatched a plan to break out of custody while he
was scheduled to undergo medical tests at Massachusetts General Hospital in May. Sharpe's
behavior in the courtroom was on trial, too. Twice he blurted out statements from the
defense table - drawing admonishments from the judge. While testifying for two days,
Sharpe squeezed his eyes shut and constantly rubbed his face. And once he refused to dress
for court, alleging that jail guards had assaulted him the previous night.
Prosecutors argued yesterday that Sharpe killed his wife, whom he'd
abused throughout their 27-year marriage, because he was angry she had left him and he
faced losing millions in a divorce. ''We have no burden of proving motive in this case,
but I submit there were 3 million motives for killing Karen Sharpe,'' Weiner said,
referring to the amount of money Sharpe had transferred to his wife's name shortly before
she left him. ''He was infuriated about the money.'' Weiner methodically laid out Sharpe's
actions during the days before and after the killing, suggesting he was in control of his
actions. He had business meetings and went out for dinner, Sharpe had testified. And on
the night of the shooting, he admitted taking a rifle from an acquaintance's home, loading
it and driving to his wife's house. Sharpe admitted to shooting his wife but told jurors
he was in a fog and couldn't recall pulling the trigger.
Prosecutors suggested yesterday that Sharpe killed his wife with a gun
he had obtained prior to the day of her death, because a ballistics expert testified that
the rifle Sharpe said he took from a home in Gloucester the night of the murder was not
the one that fired the bullet that killed Karen Sharpe. Weiner argued that rifle was
actually a second gun Sharpe had obtained to create the impression that his actions were
spur-of-the-moment. Police never found the murder weapon.
Weiner also reminded jurors of the testimony of a psychiatrist from
Bridgewater State Hospital, who said he believed that Sharpe feigned mental illness while
staying there after his arrest in the summer of 2000. The doctor said that when he
observed Sharpe from afar he appeared relaxed, but when he talked to him one-on-one,
Sharpe closed his eyes, rubbed his forehead, and behaved as if he were in pain. In
dramatic fashion, Weiner grabbed his own forehead to imitate Sharpe's mannerisms. ''Have
you seen any evidence of that in this courtroom? Have you seen any of that on the stand?''
Weiner asked, as Sharpe sat, holding his forehead. ''He's faking it. He's trying to fake
symptoms for secondary gain.''
But Balliro, who gave his 80-minute argument first, said that Sharpe
was so sick while at Bridgewater that psychiatrists increased his medications and extended
his stay. ''He doesn't exaggerate his mental condition,'' Balliro said. ''He's a doctor.
He doesn't want people to think he's crazy.'' The defense relied heavily on the testimony
of Dr. Keith Ablow, a psychiatrist who told the court that Sharpe suffers from a wide
array of mental conditions, including narcissistic personality and major depression. He
also is frantically afraid of being abandoned, Ablow said, and the prospect of losing his
wife -- who brought a facade of normalcy to his life -- drove him over the edge. A
psychiatrist who testified for the prosecution said Sharpe might have narcissistic
features, but was not psychotic and could appreciate that what he was doing was criminal.
Balliro argued that Sharpe had to be insane because someone so
intelligent wouldn't have planned a murder for which he almost certainly would be charged.
''Was he going to get his money back by shooting Karen Sharpe? That wasn't going to
happen,'' Balliro said. ''Did he try to mask his identification at all by going to a house
where everyone knew him? Where was the planning? Where was the premeditation?'' Balliro
also tried to deflect Weiner's contention that Sharpe could have controlled himself the
night of the murder because he seemed to contain himself during an incident a few days
earlier. Sharpe had driven to his wife's house, peeked in the window and found her there
with another man. He considered barging in, he testified, but instead smashed the
headlights of the man's truck. ''It was a big difference, and the big difference was
alcohol,'' Balliro said.
If convicted of first-degree murder, Sharpe would be sentenced to life
in prison without parole. If found innocent by reason of insanity, he would be committed
to a state mental hospital until he's deemed not to be a danger to himself or society.
Second-degree murder carries a life sentence, but with parole eligibility after 15 years.
The sentence for manslaughter can range from probation up to 20 years.
Doctor Found Guilty in Wife's Killing
Denise Lavoie, Associated Press- 11/27/2001
LAWRENCE, Mass. -- Dr. Richard Sharpe, was convicted of first-degree murder Tuesday for
killing his wife last year. Members of Karen Sharpe's family clutched hands and gasped at
the verdict. Her father and one of her brothers wept. ''I love Mikey and Ally. I love
Karen,'' Sharpe told WCVB-TV as he was led from the courthouse, referring to the couple's
two youngest children, now 8 and 5. The couple, who married as teen-agers, also have a
27-year-old daughter.
Jurors deliberated more than ten hours over two days before dismissing
Sharpe's argument that he was legally insane and disoriented by booze and prescription
medications during the shooting. The conviction carries an automatic sentence of life in
prison without the possibility of parole. Sentencing is scheduled for Thursday.
''Karen Sharpe was a loving mother, the best sister anybody could have,'' Kathleen Lembo,
Karen Sharpe's sister, said through tears outside the courthouse following the verdict.
''She was a wonderful daughter and a friend.''
The case drew national media attention for its lurid details.
Photographs of Sharpe wearing slinky dresses and fishnet stockings were widely published
after his arrest. Sharpe, a successful dermatologist from Gloucester, taught at Harvard
Medical School and ran a cosmetic hair removal business and an Internet-based business
that developed medical software and lasers. He had parlayed his earnings from his
businesses into millions in the stock market.
During his three-week trial in Lawrence Superior Court, Sharpe spent
two days on the witness stand. He said he didn't remember much about the night of the
killing, when he shot his wife in front of her brother and other witnesses as the couple's
two youngest children slept in another part of the house. ''I heard the gun go off,'' he
said. ''I think the noise sort of woke me up a little bit. I heard the noise and I left.''
A psychiatrist testifying for the defense said Sharpe suffered from a
half dozen psychiatric disorders, including severe depression and intermittent explosive
disorder. He said Sharpe's disorders were aggravated when he drank alcohol. Sharpe
testified he had two to four glasses of wine the night of the killing.
But prosecutors said Sharpe carefully calculated his actions before the
killing so he would appear insane, and later faked symptoms of mental illness to impress
psychiatrists and the jury. Assistant District Attorney Robert Weiner told the jury that
Sharpe stole a gun from a friend the night of the killing to make it look like a
heat-of-the-moment decision, then used another gun he had obtained before that night to
shoot his wife. Neither weapon was ever recovered. Following the verdict, Weiner called
Karen Sharpe ''a classic battered woman.'' She had left her husband just months before she
was killed. ''It was only in the end that she was free from the yolk of Richard Sharpe,
but unfortunately it was too late,'' he said outside the courthouse.
Sharpe's lawyer, Joseph Balliro, called the killing ''a tragedy for
everybody.'' ''Those three children have lost their mother and now they've lost their
father,'' Balliro said. ''There are no winners as far as this case is concerned.'' One
juror who would not identify himself said the jury did not believe Sharpe's defense. ''He
didn't have a leg to stand on ... there's no insanity there,'' he said. Sharpe also was
convicted of possession of a firearm without a license, and violating a restraining order
taken out by his wife.
Vermont to Allow Methadone Treatment of Some Prisoners
Associated Press, 11/28/2001
BURLINGTON, Vt. -- The Vermont Corrections Department plans to allow some inmates to
receive methadone in jail, a policy shift from this summer when the department fought the
issue in court. Under the new policy, inmates who are in jail on short sentences, probably
less than 90 days, and were successfully participating in a methadone program before jail
will be eligible. The rule change has not been finalized. The department is waiting for a
methadone clinic to open in Vermont, which could happen in Burlington as early as
February.
Methadone is a drug taken by heroin addicts to ease withdrawal
symptoms. Addicts often take methadone daily, so being denied the drug for even a short
stint in jail can be agonizing. ''You want to minimize the withdrawals as best you can,''
said Thomas Powell, who directs health services for the Department of Corrections. The
change will avoid forcing people to go through methadone withdrawal in jail when they are
going to go back on methadone as soon as they're out.
Last summer inmate Keith Griggs was serving a 15-day sentence for
violating the conditions of his parole. He had taken methadone for two years but was
denied the drug in jail. The Department of Corrections said that under state law, only
hospitals were allowed to dispense methadone. Griggs took the question to court where a
judge ruled that Griggs was entitled to his methadone. The state chose to release Griggs
early rather than bring methadone into the jail.
Powell said the department changed policy after consulting with
national and state experts on methadone. The Department of Corrections also wants to work
with a Vermont methadone provider, not the Greenfield, Mass., clinic, which is the primary
option for Vermonters. The program is not for inmates who walk in as heroin addicts, only
for those who are methadone patients. Inmates who are in for long sentences will be
withdrawn from methadone. No one knows how many inmates would qualify for the new policy.
Florida Sex Offenders May Go Free Because of Challenge Law
Amanda Riddle, Associated Press- 11/28/2001
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. -- Scores of rapists and child molesters could go free in Florida
because of challenges to a state law that allows them to be kept behind bars indefinitely,
even after they have served their sentences. Around the country, similar state laws
are also being tested, and one such case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court. A child
molester in Florida has already been released because of a recent state appeals court
ruling, and perhaps 200 others could get out of prison because of the decision, too.
At issue is the Jimmy Ryce Act. Under the law, when the prison sentence
of a violent sexual offender is about to end, prosecutors can ask for a civil trial to
decide whether the offender is likely to strike again and should be kept locked up until a
doctor determines he is no longer a threat. The 1998 law was named after a 9-year-old
Florida boy who was abducted, raped and murdered in 1995. His killer has been sentenced to
death.
The problem is this: Scores of offenders who have completed their
sentences but are still awaiting their civil trials are being held behind bars in the
meantime based on evidence from prosecutors that they would be a danger to society.
Earlier this month, however, a state appeals court in Lakeland ruled that such pre-trial
evidence must be given under oath.
On Monday, Thomas Hurte, 21, was freed in Palm Beach County on the
basis of that ruling. He had completed a 3½-year sentence in January for having sex with
two girls, ages 13 and 1l, and was being kept in prison, pending his civil trial, based on
evidence that was not given under oath. Palm Beach Assistant Public Defender Ken Johnson,
who represented Hurte, said keeping offenders in custody for months without sworn evidence
violates their rights. Some offenders wait as long as 1½ years for a civil trial, he
said. More than 200 offenders in Florida awaiting civil trials are covered by the Nov. 16
ruling, Johnson said. Defense attorneys have filed requests for release of at least 60 of
them.
Assistant Florida Attorney General Richard Polin, who is in charge of
defending the Ryce Act, said the state plans to fight the appeals court ruling. He said
that before any of the inmates are set free, prosecutors should be given the opportunity
to submit sworn statements from psychologists
In 1997, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a similar Kansas law, ruling
that states may keep violent sex offenders locked up beyond their prison terms. But the
high court is now revisiting the issue. The latest issue before the high court is whether
states must prove that offenders are unable to control their behavior. The Kansas Supreme
Court said states must show an utter lack of control, but the state attorney general
argues that that hurdle is too high. More than 1,200 sex offenders are confined in 18
states. The laws have survived numerous challenges and Florida's act will withstand the
latest attack, too, Polin said. Jimmy Ryce's father, Don Ryce, said he and his wife fought
to make sure Jimmy did not die in vain. ''We are not going to sit back and let a major
part of his legacy get tossed in the trash can,'' he said Tuesday.
Underrated Bullying May Be at Root of Massachusetts
Shootings
ABC News, 11/28/2001
Authorities say a planned massacre at a New Bedford, Mass., high school could have been
another Columbine or perhaps even worse if police hadn't gotten wind of a
group of students' alleged plot to detonate explosives, shoot classmates, and then kill
themselves. The students have pleaded not guilty, but according to police reports, the
five teens who allegedly planned the attack had complained of being picked on and called
names. A note found by a janitor at the school spoke of "getting everyone back for
calling us names and beating us with ugly sticks." The statement is reminiscent
of the suicide note left by Eric Harris, one of the two attackers at Columbine High School
in Littleton, Colo: "Your children who have ridiculed me, who have chosen not to
accept me, who have treated me like I am not worth their time, are dead."
Experts say bullying is a serious and widespread problem that can lead
to school shootings and suicide. At the same time, they say, it is dangerously underrated,
as schools and adults are not taking the problem seriously enough. "For the child
who's been targeted by a bully, their life is a living hell," said Glenn Stutzky, a
school violence specialist at Michigan State University. "Bullying is probably the
most frequently occurring form of violence in American schools today and it's really the
engine that's driving the majority of violence. It's a huge problem."
Even though several states have now passed anti-bullying legislation,
Stutzky said the American school system is 10 to 15 years behind countries like Australia,
Scandinavia, Great Britain and Japan, all of which deal with bullying as a serious social
problem. "We have allowed a culture of abuse to thrive unchecked in our nation's
schools," said Stutzky, "and we are paying for it with the bodies of our
children."
Physical and Emotional Toll
Though it seems so hard to understand the anger that would fuel children to plot a
massacre at their high school, sadly, many children can relate to the feelings of
loneliness, abuse or resentment. "Once I got teased, I could see where that anger
comes from and what can make someone want to kill," said Stefan Barone, a 14-year-old
from Staten Island, N.Y., who said he was bullied during seventh and eighth grades.
"Even though I never got to that point, I could understand where it was coming
from." Day after day throughout the country, kids wake up terrified to go to school,
knowing they will be the victims of teasing, taunting, name calling or physical abuse.
For Rachel Fannon, 16, being abused by her classmates in Littleton,
Colo., for 5 ½ years took both a physical and emotional toll. "They had actually a
contest: They'd high-five each other if they come up with the best name how to describe
how ugly I was," she said. "They'd kick me in the back of the knees and give me
small bruises or they tripped me." Fannon, who has a heart condition, would suffer
attacks of rapid heartbeats after being harassed. Her grades dropped. She became withdrawn
and had no friends. After school she would lock herself in her room and cry.
"All day, every day, they kept harassing me," she said.
"Everywhere I went, there they were." Fannon said teachers told her to
"tough it out" or to "just ignore it." She said she was too
embarrassed to tell her parents, but she finally confided in her mother. Principals of her
school say the complaints never reached them, but they admit that despite their
anti-bullying policies, Fannon somehow fell through the cracks. Fannon who now goes
to a new school where she says she is treated "like a human being" is
hardly alone.
Despite being 6 feet 11 inches and 280 pounds, Chris Velasquez, now 14,
said he was beaten so badly at his middle school that one time he was taken to the
emergency room. "They caught me in the stairwell and jumped me and I couldn't see
anything," he recalled. "I had one kid punching me a lot of times in the face,
and one just repeatedly hitting me in the back." Though the incident was reported to
school authorities, Velasquez said the boys who beat him up were not even suspended. His
family is now suing the school district.
"We have a whole generation of adults in the educational system
that still view bullying as 'just that's the way it is,'" said Stutzky. "It's a
rite of passage, it's boys being boys
stop whining about it, life is tough, you
just have to put up with it and make your own way through."
Possible Consequences: School Shootings and Suicide
To deal with being bullied, some children seek revenge. Velasquez can understand. "I
do think about going into school and doing something," he said. "But then I
think what will that make me look like? A criminal." Other children turn their anger
inward. Each year, one out of 13 kids under the age of 19 attempts suicide, a rate that
has tripled over the last 20 years. Last year, more than 2,000 of them succeeded a
staggering number Stutzky blames largely on bullying. "We're not even realizing the
fact that suicide is bullying's quiet little secret," he said. "It's picking off
our children one at a time."
Twelve-year-old Tempest Smith was one of them. From the time she was in
the second grade, said her mother Danessa Smith, Tempest was the brunt of cruel jokes and
constant humiliation. One time, recalls Smith, a group of kids pretending to be Tempest's
friends came over to her house, only to ransack her room. Tempest would also be pushed in
the lunch line, and her classmates would purposely knock things off her desk. Smith said
the school wouldn't even acknowledge there was a problem. "If it was not done in
front of them, there's nothing they could do," Smith said she was told. By the time
Tempest reached the seventh grade, Smith was so fed up that she planned to home-school her
daughter. But she never got that chance. On Feb. 20, Tempest took her own life. Smith is
now suing the school district, which has denied any wrongdoing.
Though Tempest cannot benefit from her peer's advice, Stefan Barone
wanted to share advice with others who feel isolated and alone: "I'd like to say that
there's going to be an end to it sooner or later
One day it's going to end and
everything's going to turn around
you have to have hope."
The Dark Side of Group Identity
Melinda T. Willis, ABC News- 11/28/2001
B O S T O N Preps, jocks, and goths -- when do such teen cliques go from being a
positive to a destructive force? In the wake of charges that a group of New Bedford,
Mass., teenagers planned a local high school killing spree that officials said targeted
"thugs, preps, and faculty," many may be left wondering about the extent to
which an "us versus them" belief system can spark violence in American schools.
Cliques and groups are common to school age children and do not necessarily mean trouble,
agree experts. But as past events have demonstrated, it is also critically important to
acknowledge when such group identity becomes a threat.
When Cliques Click
"Particularly in American culture, peer crowds are a very common phenomenon and they
do serve a purpose," says Mitch Prinstein, assistant professor of psychology and
director of clinical training at Yale University. According to Prinstein, these groups can
help adolescents navigate through social networks and categorize peers, especially during
times when many students move into larger schools such as in middle school and high
school. "These groups are also sort of a shortcut for adolescents to develop
friendships and romantic relationships," says Prinstein. Overall, groups play an
important role in identity formation. "That children identify themselves with a group
is part of deciding who they are and having a feeling of belonging," adds Linda
Madison, a child psychologist and director of family support and psychological services at
Children's Hospital in Omaha, Neb.
Dangers of Group Identity
Experts also acknowledge that there is a dark side to cliques as well. "The downside
is that there are some groups that are valued more highly than others," says Jay
Bass, a counselor and violence prevention consultant based in Washington, D.C.
Additionally, "those who cannot latch into groups are somewhat disenfranchised."
In other words, those who do not fit into a specific group may feel neglected or hostile
towards those who do and have a higher profile as a result. These individuals may then
establish a group identity that is purposely set apart from what they see as being widely
accepted.
"Research shows that when children's identity with other children
focuses around emotional support rather than activity or positive purpose, they tend to be
more destructive," explains Madison. "When they are in a group that defines
themselves so rigidly that it excludes other groups, then there is more competition with
other groups." "As the group goes down the road to more destructive behaviors,
it may be difficult for the kids not to go along with them," she adds.
Social groups can begin to demonstrate their hostile feelings in a wide
variety of negative and harmful behaviors. Teenagers may act out emotionally by teasing,
harassing or verbally attacking schoolmates, or physically by pushing or hitting. The most
extreme, and experts say very rare, form of acting out is the use of guns or other
weapons.
Preventing Destructive Consequences
What steps can parents and educators take in making sure that healthy group behavior does
not become destructive or victimize those who do not fit in? "Modeling is number
one," says Madison. "It's really important [for adults] to model appropriate
inclusive type behaviors." For example, if children repeatedly witness behaviors in
adults that appear to place importance on certain racial, ethnic, or social groups and
exclude those who do not belong, they will likely emulate these behaviors.
Parents should also give their children lots of venues for social
involvement, maintain interest in their lives and foster involvement in extracurricular
activities, say experts. This will ensure that there are many different settings in which
a child can find friends and social support. And most of all, an important part of keeping
group dynamics from taking a tragic toll on children is for adults to try to instill a
sense of belonging that is not limited to a social group. "Connectedness with parents
and identification with school are two of the most protective factors for kids," says
Madison.
Illinois Man Says Ex-Wife Suffered Depression, 'But She's
Sane'
Flynn McRoberts & Jeff Coen, Chicago Tribune- 11/29/2001
David Lemak held jurors rapt Wednesday as he recalled the morning he rushed to his
family's Victorian home in Naperville, only to find it swathed in police tape, a
helicopter hovering overhead. As Lemak approached the house, a police officer stopped him
from going inside and told him that his three children--Nicholas, 7, Emily, 6, and Thomas,
3--were dead. "I asked to go in. I said, `Maybe there's a chance they're still alive.
I'd like to check on them,'" said Lemak, an emergency room physician, in his second
day of testimony in the murder trial of his former wife, Marilyn. "They said
no." Prosecutor Joseph Ruggiero later handed him autopsy photographs of the three
children, oldest to youngest. Lemak's composure slipped away as he pronounced each name.
By "Thomas," his voice broke and tears fell.
As Lemak recounted the morning of March 5, 1999, several family members
and friends wept quietly in the packed DuPage County courtroom. Some wore clusters of
ribbons on their lapels--two blue ones for Nicholas and Thomas, a pink one for Emily.
Lemak's voice was steady again when Ruggiero asked him whether he thought his then-wife
was unable to appreciate the criminality of her actions because of "mental
defect"--the legal definition of insanity. "No," Lemak said sharply.
"She was sane."
But on cross-examination by Marilyn Lemak's lead defense attorney, John
Donahue, David Lemak acknowledged that he thought his estranged wife was suffering from
"major depression." After Donahue repeatedly asked Lemak about her state of mind
on the day of the slayings, Lemak said she had "a major depression, but to a mild
degree ... mild to moderate degree, yes."
Marilyn Lemak's state of mind is the crux of the case, which began with
opening arguments Tuesday. (Though the defendant now uses her maiden name, Morrissey, she
is referred to in criminal court as Marilyn Lemak.) Defense attorneys say she was legally
insane. Prosecutors contend she killed her children to spite her husband after she
discovered he had begun dating another woman as their divorce was being concluded.
David Lemak testified Tuesday that he had made no attempt to hide the
relationship and had taken the girlfriend to a hospital function. But two days before the
children were killed, he said Wednesday, the girlfriend had stayed overnight in his new
home just down the street from the family home. He said he had her park the car out front
so it couldn't be seen from the children's nearby grade school.
Prosecutors used that relationship to underscore their theory that it
sent Marilyn Lemak into a jealous fit that culminated in the killing of their children.
The day before the slayings, Lemak testified, his estranged wife brought the kids over for
a scheduled visitation and asked to use the bathroom. When she came out, he said that she
told him "she was glad that the two of us [Lemak and his girlfriend] had a chance to
shower before the kids came over." He added that she was "angry, but mostly
sarcastic."
In questioning Lemak, Ruggiero brought out that his estranged wife
allegedly had scrawled a message on the bottom of dresser drawers before he moved out. The
message accused him of being "an adulterer and abandoning your children."
Naperville Police Detective Mike Cross testified that Marilyn Lemak repeated those
sentiments when he interviewed her in Naperville's Edward Hospital the morning the
children were found dead. When he asked her why she killed her children, Cross said that
Lemak replied: "Because her husband was not keeping them No. 1 on his priority
list." After he first identified himself as a Naperville police detective, Cross
recalled, "She said, `I did it."'
He then read Marilyn Lemak her Miranda rights and asked her to describe
what had occurred. She told him that she drugged the children with three tablets of
Ativan, an anti-anxiety drug she had been taking, Cross testified. When those had "no
effect," she allegedly told Cross, she gave them three more, and they started to
hallucinate. "They were reaching for things that weren't there," Cross said she
told him, then demonstrated for the court by repeatedly grasping at the air with his right
hand.
911 tape played
Contradicting the defense description of a peaceful death scene, Cross testified that
Marilyn Lemak told him Emily and Thomas, who were killed first, struggled for breath as
she covered their mouths and noses. To illustrate, the detective reared his head back
several times, audibly gasping for air. After the killings and her own botched suicide
attempt, Lemak awoke several hours later to find the children dead. She dizzily crawled to
the bathroom to find the X-acto knife she'd used to slash her right wrist, Cross told
DuPage County State's Atty. Joseph Birkett, who is leading the prosecution. Unable to find
the knife, she called 911.
Prosecutors played the 911 tape for jurors, who used copies of a
transcript to follow the recording. Many spectators in the courtroom's packed gallery
focused on David Lemak as the taped sounds of his ex-wife's wailing filled the room. Lemak
stared intently at his ex-wife as she dabbed her eyes and wiped her nose with a tissue.
"My three kids are dead, and I ... I wanted to be dead too, but it didn't work,"
she said on the tape, deliberate at first. "I did it." And then, between heavy
breaths and moans: "I didn't want to wake up this morning, but I did. But the kids
didn't."
Birkett worked to tear down the version of the children's deaths
presented in opening statements Tuesday by Lemak's defense. Her lawyers had told the jury
that Marilyn Lemak wanted to go with her children in death to a "happier place,"
free from emotional pain, that she didn't know she was committing a crime, but thought she
was performing an act of love. Birkett put the question to Cross: Had Lemak ever told him
that she killed her children and tried to kill herself so they could all "go to a
happier place together"? "No, she did not," he answered.
In his cross-examination, Donahue picked at the detective's
recollection of the interview, concentrating on Marilyn Lemak's response to Cross'
question about how she felt after slashing her wrist and hitting an artery. "She said
that made her happy," Cross testified. "Why?" Donahue asked. "Because
she was going to die," came the reply. Donahue also asked Cross if he had asked
Marilyn Lemak whether she knew killing the children was wrong or criminal. The detective
said he had not.
Drug combination
Much of Donahue's cross-examination of David Lemak seemed to be an effort to portray
him as out of touch with issues of his wife's mental health. In doing so, Donahue
suggested that Marilyn Lemak was affected by the combination of drugs she was taking.
Describing what he said were Marilyn Lemak's swings in weight of as much as 60 pounds
after Emily's birth, Donahue suggested she was affected by taking both the anti-depressant
Prozac and the weight-loss cocktail "fen-phen," which David Lemak had prescribed
to his wife. Fen-phen, or fenfluramine-phentermine, gained wide attention after the
federal government pulled it from the market in 1997 because some people using it suffered
heart-valve damage. According to a pharmaceutical database, abruptly stopping the use of
fenfluramine by itself can lead to a depressive episode. "Were you aware she was
taking fen-phen at the same time she was taking Prozac?" Donahue asked.
"No," David Lemak replied.
Prosecutors also called a series of medical personnel who treated
Marilyn Lemak the day her children were discovered dead. An emergency room nurse and
doctor from Edward Hospital and two paramedics all testified they found Lemak to be alert
and lucid during her treatment. Nurse Sandra Clow was asked by prosecutors whether Marilyn
Lemak ever told her she killed her children to take them to "a happy place." No,
the nurse answered. Donahue countered by asking Clow whether Lemak ever told her she
killed the kids to spite her husband, the state's allegation. Again, the nurse said no.
Paramedic Phillip DeMik, testified he was the first emergency worker to
reach the children and quickly determined they were beyond saving. He said Marilyn Lemak
asked to kiss her children goodbye as she was taken from the house on a stretcher. "I
consulted with a police officer," DeMik said, "and the answer was no."
'I Didn't Know I Did Shooting,' California Man Testifies
Stuart Pfeifer, Los Angeles Times- 11/29/2001
Speaking publicly for the first time about the seven people he killed, former Cal State
Fullerton janitor Edward Charles Allaway said Wednesday that delusions led him to believe
he was one of the victims--not the killer. Even as seven people lay dead and two wounded
at the campus library in 1976, Allaway thought he was calling police to report that he had
been assaulted when he actually was confessing, he testified in a Santa Ana courtroom.
"I thought I explained to them that I was hurt," Allaway told
a judge who will decide whether to release him from a state mental hospital. "I was
beaten up and I wanted to press charges. I didn't know I did the shooting. I couldn't
accept it or have a real understanding of what I had done." Allaway told Judge Frank
F. Fasel that he initially planned to call in sick on July 12, 1976, but instead found
himself at the library, lying on the ground and feeling a pain in his neck. "I
thought I got shot in the back of the neck," he said. He was not actually injured.
Allaway said he knows he went into the library but does not remember
shooting anyone. Instead, he has visions of running behind victim Debbie Paulsen, thinking
they were both fleeing an enraged assailant. Allaway said he has since learned that he
shot Paulsen in the back while the 26-year-old woman fled.
As Allaway spoke, Paulsen's brother, Paul, removed his glasses and
began to cry in the back row of the courtroom. Paul Paulsen is among a group of victims'
relatives who are opposing Allaway's release from Patton State Hospital near in San
Bernardino. Hearing Allaway describe his memories of the shootings made some of those
relatives angry. "I don't believe that; he's never said that before . . . not for 25
years," said Patricia Almazan, whose father, Frank Teplansky, died in the rampage.
But one victim's widow seated in the front row of the courtroom said
it's time to set the 62-year-old Allaway free. "I don't believe in vengeance and
that's what this is all about," said Judith Herzberg, whose husband, Paul, died in
the shootings. "What we're trying to do is take an insanity plea and turn it into
life imprisonment." Herzberg, who works as a real estate lawyer in Long Beach, said
she believes Allaway was never mentally ill and that it would be inappropriate to keep him
locked up in a mental hospital when he's psychologically fit. Allaway's lawyer, Deputy
Public Defender John Bovee, welcomed Herzberg's support. "I'm glad to hear that some
people are thinking it's time to do away with revenge and move on with the healing
process. That's really what this is all about," Bovee said.
As a way to make amends with his victims, Allaway said he has tried to
remember each of their names. His voice trembling, Allaway named eight of the shooting
victims from the witness stand. He forgot the name of Seth Fessenden, a retired professor,
until his memory was jogged by a prosecutor who is opposing his release. Allaway later
described Fessenden as "the sweetest man I ever knew."
Two Previous Bids for Freedom Failed
A judge found Allaway not guilty by reason of insanity in 1977. The former
Marine and Detroit auto factory worker has spent nearly a quarter-century in state mental
hospitals. He has twice previously lost bids to gain his freedom, but this time, doctors
and staff at Patton say they consider him safe for release. Several doctors say Allaway's
schizophrenia is in remission. His case has attracted international attention. Mental
health experts said no killer in U.S. history with as many victims as Allaway has been
released from a mental hospital.
Orange County Deputy Dist. Atty. Daniel Wagner focused his
cross-examination Wednesday on Allaway's history of violence. The former janitor said he
has been involved in numerous fights, including an assault on his ex-wife before the
shootings, and some skirmishes in state hospitals afterward. Wagner also questioned
Allaway about whether he's truly remorseful, noting that he has done nothing to support
his victims' families, including the three children of Allaway's best friend, Donald
Karges, who died in the shootings. "I don't have anything," Allaway replied,
saying his maintenance job at Patton pays 30 cents an hour.
The soft-spoken Allaway remained composed during Wagner's questioning.
He said his mental health has improved remarkably during years of therapy, but he could
not pinpoint the date he believes he was cured. "It takes time. Nothing happens
overnight. It's not like the flu," Allaway said. "I'm the best I can be. I feel
good about my improvement." Allaway is scheduled to begin his third day of testimony
today.
Ecstasy Use May Differ in Effects on Men & Women
Emma Ross, Associated Press- 11/29/2001
Ecstasy, the increasingly popular party drug, may cause more brain damage in women than
in men, new research suggests. A study published this week in The Lancet medical journal
compared brain scans of people who had taken 50 or more Ecstasy tablets in their lifetimes
with those of a group who had never taken the drug. The findings indicated women -- but
not men -- lost a significant number of brain cells, even though the men had taken more
Ecstasy over the years. Fifty tablets is considered the threshold for increased risk of
developing psychiatric problems. Experts said the preliminary findings raised an
interesting possibility but that larger studies are needed to confirm the results.
Ecstasy, also known as XTC or E, affects serotonin, a brain chemical
that regulates mood, emotion, sleep, appetite, memory and sexual behavior. The drug
typically induces feelings of euphoria, increased energy and sexual arousal, and makes
people feel a need to be touched or hugged. The illegal drug, known scientifically as
MDMA, is also said to suppress the need to eat, drink or sleep, making it possible to
endure parties for two or three days. However, in high doses it can cause a sharp increase
in body temperature, leading to muscle breakdown, kidney and heart failure, and death.
Studies have shown it also kills brain cells that release serotonin.
Scientists are now trying to find out how long the brain damage lasts and its long-term
consequences. So far, studies have found heavy users have persistent memory problems and
preliminary research suggests they also have trouble with verbal reasoning and sustaining
attention.
In the latest study, Dutch scientists compared the brain scans of 69
people, who were divided into four groups. One included people who used drugs but not
Ecstasy, the second comprised those who had taken fewer than 50 tablets during their
lives. The third, the heavy users, had taken 50 or more Ecstasy pills and the fourth group
included people who used to be heavy users but had given up Ecstasy at least a year before
the study. The researchers found that compared to the brains of women who had never
taken Ecstasy, the brains of heavy Ecstasy female users had weaker concentrations of
serotonin transporters, the sites on brain cell surfaces that mop up serotonin from the
space between cells after it has finished acting on other cells. If the chemical is not
mopped up, further brain signals are prevented from getting through.
MDMA gets into the brain cell through the serotonin transporter. A
missing transporter means a dead cell, said the study's leader, Dr. Liesbeth Reneman,
professor of radiology at the Academic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam. The
decline in serotonin transporters was not seen in the men's brain scans, she said.
Kathryn Cunningham, professor of pharmacology and toxicology at the
University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, said it makes sense that men and women
would respond differently to MDMA. One reason is that amphetamines are cleared from the
body more quickly in the presence of testosterone, she said. Also the female hormone
estrogen regulates the serotonin transporter, said Cunningham, who was not involved in the
study. "Estrogen-dependent changes in the serotonin transporter might regulate
the brain response, and thus toxicity, to MDMA. And it's conceivable that women may be
more vulnerable to brain damage at certain times of the month," she said.
Center Seeking Better Treatments for Mood Disorders
Deborah Mann Lake, Houston Chronicle- 11/29/2001
Most people think of depression as an adult disease. But as research generates
knowledge about mood disorders and their biological links, more therapists are treating
children and adolescents -- some as young as age 5 -- for these conditions. To develop
better treatments for children with mood disorders the University of Texas Medical Branch
at Galveston has opened the Mood and Anxiety Center for Children and Adolescents.
The first of many research projects the center will undertake is a
study on adolescents who were unsuccessfully treated with a mood disorder medication, said
psychiatrist Dr. Karen Dineen Wagner, the center's director and director of UTMB's
division of child and adolescent psychiatry. Wagner is the lead investigator for this
five-site medication study funded by the National Institute of Mental Health. "We're
going to be looking at what you do next. Do you try another psychotherapy drug or a
combination of another drug and psychotherapy?" Wagner said. "We found that the
response to medication in children varies and the rate of medication failure is higher
than in adults."
Mood disorders include depression, bipolar disorder and anxiety
disorders, which include obsessive-compulsive disorder, social anxiety and post-traumatic
stress disorder. "Mood disorders have been under-recognized in children because the
symptoms might confuse parents. The child may not be crying all the time or acting sad. He
might be irritable or have sleeping problems and parents may think it's just a stage he's
going through," Wagner said.
Signs of a mood disorder in children also include performing poorly at
school, weight changes, drops in self-esteem, social isolation, expressions of
hopelessness and "saying they wish they were dead," she said. "A 5-year-old
might be crying all the time and doesn't want to be with anyone," Wagner said.
"A 6-year-old might say they wish they were never born."
Sometimes a stressful event can trigger a mood disorder, such as a loss
of a relationship (especially for teen-agers) or the loss of a parent. Even children who
may not have experienced an event firsthand may still exhibit a mood disorder -- the
reaction among some children to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 is an example. "If
they're concerned it could happen to them, it could lead to anxiety," Wagner said.
"Something like our recent flood was a life-threatening event out of normal. Being in
a severe motor vehicle accident, being injured by an animal or being physically or
sexually abused can cause post-traumatic stress disorder." In other cases, a mood
disorder comes "completely out of the blue," she said, particularly if an
illness such as depression runs in the family.
Once the disorder begins, it can snowball quickly. "Children are
labeled as being `moody' or `hard to get along with.' They complain about everything and
don't like anyone," Wagner said. "They start to fail in school and their friends
don't want to be around them because they're so irritable. Then they start to withdraw
from activities." As many as 5 percent of children and adolescents suffer from
major depression and an untreated episode lasts, on average, nine months. This could
impact an entire school year for a child and delay his academic and social development,
Wagner said. He may find it difficult to re-establish friendships, and other children at
school may begin to pick on him. "They can be tormented by their peers and become
even more depressed. A lot of children don't realize what they're doing when they tease or
torment other kids. Children with mood disorders have low self-esteem anyway and that
daily verbal assault just lowers it more," Wagner said.
Older adolescents commonly turn to drugs or alcohol, she said, to
relieve the symptoms of the depression or anxiety. But that can make the illness worse and
even lead to suicide. "We encourage parents with depressed children to remove all
guns from the house. They can pick up a weapon without thinking and it can be
lethal," she said.
In bipolar disorder (also called manic depression), children will swing
from an elevated mood that is almost euphoric to a deep depression. "When their mood
is elevated, they don't need to sleep and (they) get involved in a lot of activities or
risky behavior. Their speech might be very rapid," Wagner said. "That will
alternate with periods of depression." With an obsessive-compulsive disorder,
children worry nonstop about an event such as a parent dying. Feeling they have to do
something to alleviate the worry, children with this condition perform an action over and
over again. "It's like that nagging feeling that you have sometimes about
whether or not you locked the door or turned off the coffee pot," Wagner explained.
"Except for these children, they'll check the door 100 times. Checking it once
doesn't relieve their nagging feeling." A child who has a social disorder may
be terrified of being in a situation where he thinks he'll be judged. Often mislabeled as
shy, Wagner said, a child with a social disorder may have difficulty reading out loud,
raising his hand in the classroom or participating in sports.
Wagner said parents should use their own gut instinct about whether
their child might have a mood disorder. "What we tell parents is that if they are
worried about the child, that's a good sign the child should be evaluated," she said.
"Parents are pretty good judges of their own children." Wagner is hopeful that
the center will help encourage parents to get help for their children before the
depression becomes severe. "The stigma is starting to go away." Wagner said.
"Parents want their children to be healthy physically and emotionally. The
educational efforts are improving to raise awareness of mood disorders."
In the Grip of GHB
Linda Marsa, Los Angeles Times- 11/29/2001
Despite reports linking it to dozens of deaths and thousands of overdoses, the illegal
supplement GHB just won't disappear. First banned in this country more than a decade ago
by federal regulators, the substance--best known as a party drug used on the rave
scene--remains popular with fitness buffs, insomniacs and the depressed, who buy it on the
Internet and from underground sources.
Now medical experts report another troubling problem: GHB is highly
addictive and can be more difficult to kick than heroin. But unlike opiate addiction, most
doctors are unaware of the stranglehold that GHB has on users. Consequently, medical
treatment is often ineffective. GHB, which severely depresses the nervous system, has sent
more people to emergency rooms than a more highly publicized club drug, Ecstasy--about
12,900 at last count--and has been blamed for 71 GHB-related deaths since 1990, according
to federal statistics. "This is the most addictive drug I've ever seen," says
Dr. Stephen W. Smith, an emergency room doctor at Hennepin County Medical Center in
Minneapolis who has treated about 50 patients for GHB addiction problems since 1998.
"People are desperate to get off of it because it's destroying their lives," he
says, yet only about one in 10 of his patients has successfully kicked the habit.
No one knows exactly how many Americans are addicted to GHB, or gamma
hydroxy butyrate, because the federal government did not begin monitoring GHB abuse until
after the drug was declared illegal in March 2000. No statistics have yet been released.
GHB use is also difficult to track because the chemical is excreted from the body within
12 hours, and most emergency rooms don't test for the presence of the drug. Consequently,
GHB use often goes undetected. Trinka Porrata, a retired Los Angeles Police Department
narcotics detective who has investigated GHB for more than five years, believes that the
statistics on emergency room visits and deaths linked to GHB understate the problem.
"These figures are just the tip of the iceberg and the actual numbers are probably
much higher," says Porrata, who advises law enforcement officials on GHB's dangers.
Most GHB abusers are not street junkies looking for a new high,
however. Typically, they are people who have turned to the drug, which is promoted as a
natural, nutritional supplement, to build buff bodies, lose weight or to fight insomnia,
premenstrual pain and depression. Some professional athletes have used the
substance--usually sold as a salty-tasting liquid--to improve performance. Phoenix Suns
basketball player Tom Gugliotta, for instance, nearly died in 1999 after ingesting a GHB
supplement to help him sleep.
Some users know the drug is illegal and buy bootleg brews over the
Internet or from the back rooms of health food emporiums. Others stumble across ads on the
Internet and purchase what they believe is a natural remedy to beat the blues or get in
shape. While there's no evidence that it helps increase muscle mass, "GHB seems to
help users sleep better," says Smith, an assistant professor of clinical emergency
medicine at the University of Minnesota School of Medicine. "If they suffer from
depression, they tell me that GHB makes them feel normal for the first time in their
lives."
Medical experts don't have a clear idea of how GHB affects the body
because no definitive research has been done. Based on physicians' observations of how it
affects people, however, they speculate that it alters levels of brain chemicals like
dopamine and serotonin, which regulate mood and impulse control. In small doses, GHB is a
mild stimulant that produces a feeling of intoxication or euphoria and releases
inhibitions, which is why it's a popular party drug. In higher doses, however, anecdotal
reports indicate it seriously depresses the central nervous system. Even a small increase
in the dosage can push the sedative effects to a lethal level, causing unconsciousness,
slowed heart rate, respiratory depression and coma, doctors say. And habitual use, even
for just a few weeks, can cause people to become physically and psychologically addicted,
according to doctors who've treated GHB addicts. "These are often not people with an
addiction history," says Dr. Karen Miotto, a psychiatrist at UCLA School of Medicine.
"They stumble on GHB and have the hardest time staying off. I've had people cry,
'I've never abused drugs. I'm a monster. What happened to me?'"
Tony Young, 39, of Seattle, saw an ad in a bodybuilding magazine for a
product touted as an all-natural supplement that would help boost muscle mass. He ordered
a two-month supply for $75. The supplement, whose active ingredient is a form of GHB, made
him feel more relaxed and improved his sleep. But if he missed a dose, "I'd get
cranky and severely depressed." He knew he was hooked. His addiction escalated to a
$4,000-a-month habit. He sipped capfuls of GHB virtually around the clock. He tried drug
rehabilitation twice but relapsed both times because he felt swallowed up in a depression
when he stopped taking GHB. Young struggled to maintain his normal routine, but he'd
sometimes black out while driving. He was arrested several times for driving under the
influence, and he crashed two cars, including one belonging to his employer, which cost
him his job as an elevator mechanic supervisor. About a year ago, Young, a husband and a
father of two young boys, was sent to jail after a DUI conviction. "GHB ruined my
life," he said in a telephone interview from the King County Jail in Kent, Wash.
"I've let everyone down."
Despite the federal ban, GHB and its various chemical cousins,
including GBL (gamma butyrolactone) and BD (1,4 butenediol), remain popular at gyms
frequented by serious bodybuilders. It is passed around weight rooms, sold out of cars in
parking lots and dispensed from behind juice-bar counters, according to those familiar
with its sale and use. For bodybuilders, GHB's allure comes from the scientifically
unproven claim that its use will help people build bigger, leaner physiques. Promoters of
the drug contend that it helps to release growth hormones, boosting muscle mass and
trimming fat.
GHB was first developed in the 1960s as an anesthetic, but research was
discontinued when high doses in animals caused grand mal seizures, says Dr. Wallace D.
Winters, a former UCLA pharmacology professor who has studied GHB. In the 1980s, GHB was
sold in health food stores as a sleep aid and nonsteroidal performance enhancer for
bodybuilders. In 1990, however, the Food and Drug Administration yanked GHB from the
market after the agency received dozens of reports of adverse affects, ranging from nausea
and vomiting to seizures, comas and death.
Supplement manufacturers circumvented the federal ban by developing
chemically similar products. When people consumed these products, which had legal uses as
industrial solvents or cleaners, the body metabolized them and converted them into GHB.
Thus, the products had the same effects as those of GHB. These products were marketed
under such brand names as Blue Nitro, Enliven, Thunder Nectar and Serenity. In March 2000,
federal regulators stepped in again to close a legal loophole and extended the ban to
include chemical analogues of GHB.
But that action still hasn't halted trade in GHB products. The Internet
is rife with thinly disguised products containing GHB and similar compounds that sell for
$50 to $75 a bottle. And while the manufacture and sale of GHB and similar compounds is
against the law, the drug easily can be made with two legal ingredients: gamma butyl
lactone, an industrial solvent used for degreasing engines and as a floor stripper, and
sodium hydroxide, or lye. Recipes for making bootleg GHB are available over the Internet,
and the street version is potentially hazardous because of uncertain quality control in
underground labs, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse. In fact, there have
been several cases in which users burned their mouths, throats and esophagi with what is
essentially lye because the GHB wasn't formulated correctly, according to Porrata.
GHB seems to "constantly keep reinventing itself" and
attracting new groups of users, says Dr. Alex Stalcup, an addiction specialist in Concord,
Calif., who first noticed in the late 1980s that habitual GHB users suffered withdrawal
symptoms. He was medical director of San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury Free Clinic at the
time. He said he is now treating GHB addicts who have worked in Silicon Valley's
technology companies and who have used the drug "to come off of amphetamines."
To be sure, GHB isn't addictive for everyone. "The people who get
addicted are not the partyers who take it occasionally," says Smith, of the
University of Minnesota. "The GHB addicts are the ones who use it regularly for
health reasons--bodybuilders or people who suffer from depression." Several
recovering GHB addicts said in interviews that they initially felt great when they started
taking the drug. They said they would take a capful at night and wake up feeling refreshed
and energized after four or five hours of sleep. But these people, who asked not to be
identified, said that their GHB use eventually became more frequent and that they needed
more of the drug to produce the same feeling.
Addiction experts said that withdrawal from GHB is worse than kicking
cocaine. Typical symptoms include insomnia, nausea, vomiting, tremors and seizures. Some
sweat profusely and ooze a waxy, oily liquid from their hands or soles of their feet.
Blood pressure and heart rates soar to dangerous levels, and many have mini-seizures in
which their heads snap forward suddenly--a syndrome habitual users call "carpeting
out" or "throwing down," says Smith. "It's similar to severe alcohol
withdrawal where there's an outpouring of adrenaline and epinephrine--two hormones that
spike the heart rate and blood pressure." Compounding the problem is that most
doctors don't know how to treat GHB addiction--or even recognize that GHB is the problem
when addicts are undergoing withdrawal symptoms. "Unless the person tells them
they're on GHB, doctors don't know what they're dealing with," says Stalcup.
Unlike drugs or alcohol, which can be detoxified from the body within a
few days, the acute phase of GHB withdrawal lasts up to two weeks, addiction specialists
say. Delirium, disorientation and hallucinations can sometimes last for days. Some
patients are in such a state of agitation that they are sedated with drugs or must be
placed in restraints. Patients often are released after three days, even though they are
still experiencing withdrawal symptoms, because most addiction centers don't realize they
need to stay longer. "Many people have protracted symptoms where they are anxious and
depressed for months," says Miotto. "They self-medicate with alcohol and all
kinds of drugs when they get off GHB--and end up dependent on opiates like Vicodin in an
effort to make themselves feel right. Some don't get back to normal for a year, and a few
never do. That's why so many relapse; the withdrawal is so debilitating that they get
stuck in a vicious cycle where they can't get off."
Patti Trovato-Ragano says her son, Matthew Coda, might still be alive
if he had received adequate medical care after he became addicted to GHB in the early
1990s. Coda became addicted to GHB in 1998 after years of taking what he initially
believed to be natural, herbal supplements to help him get fit. At the height of his
addiction, he was rushed to the emergency room in a coma 18 times in two years. "He'd
fall asleep standing up," recalls Trovato-Ragano, an oncology nurse in Naples, Fla.
"If he didn't have his bottle of GHB, he couldn't sleep. He'd have terrible stomach
pains and vomiting; he was severely depressed; his heart rate would jump to 120, and his
blood pressure was off the charts." In August 1999, Coda, then 26, entered a
detoxification program. But a week later, he was back on the street, even though he was
still suffering from serious withdrawal symptoms. Apparently, in his quest for relief,
Coda accidentally overdosed on other drugs. On Sept. 1, he was found dead in his bed.
"He was begging for help for months," says his mother. "But the doctors
didn't have a clue about GHB."
Trading Places in the Psych Unit
Elissa Ely, Los Angeles Times- 11/29/2001
BOSTON, Mass.--One difference between staff and patients on the psychiatric unit is
supposed to be this: Staffers can function when patients cannot. On our unit, though, all
that has gone topsy-turvy. Staffers are supposed to be healthier, luckier and the owners
of stronger psychological defenses. These defenses are a measure of mental health; they
prevent indefensible anxiety. The more successful among us use altruism,
intellectualization and humor to get a great deal done. The less successful use delusions
and hallucinations. Throughout the course of a lifetime, we place our particular sandbags
against the advancing enemy world.
After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, we held a community meeting at
the state hospital where I work. The usual hierarchy had collapsed. Doctors knew no more
than anyone else about what had happened, which meant there was unity in fear. And, for a
moment, the sickest were wrenched straight into sanity. One patient, who usually spoke in
word-salad, asked with perfect diction when Boston would disappear. Another pointed out
that all the soap operas had been canceled. A new patient wept and said, "I was the
leech between the legs of Desert Storm. I hope I'm not involved in this." Her
neighbor, a schizophrenic, reassured her that this was a ridiculous idea, a crazy idea.
His lucidity was astounding.
Since then, with few exceptions, the patients are functioning--at
least, in their ways. No one has needed more sleep medication, the restraint beds are no
fuller than usual, and even individual delusions have not been updated. The man convinced
that he has been on the hit list of the Hells Angels for years, has not fitted his
persecutors with turbans. The hand-washing patient, rubbing her skin off each morning
"in order to decontaminate it," is not worried about anthrax. You might expect
that the sick would grow sicker, the paranoid more vigilant and the depressed suicidal.
But their defenses--those dense, reliable buffers--are working again. Ours are not. The
nurse who took an annual trip to an unpronounceable place, while the rest of the staff
vied for her postcards, is no longer flying. The social worker forgets names in the middle
of meetings and gazes out windows when people are talking to him. We are all more
irritable and less tolerant. Our adaptive defenses are missing.
Why are the healthy undone and the sick unchanged? Psychosis is not a
serene place to live, but it is utterly involving, utterly self-absorbed; a state of mind
that fiddles while the universe goes up in flames. In this paradoxical moment, the
defenses of the very ill are stronger than ours. They go about their business; we cannot.
A recent memo from the chief of psychiatry circulated among staff. It was meant to
reassure. In case of bioterrorism, it said, there was no need to panic. If evacuation was
necessary, the local Fire Department would direct all hospital actions. A senior nurse
copied the memo. She went from staff member to staff member, reading it aloud and
laughing. "The Fire Department," she said, "That makes me feel good.
They'll know just where to put 170 locked-door patients." With each reading, her
laugh was a bit shriller. Humor is a higher defense, but there was no humor in the sounds
she made.
Yet, for the patients, life goes on much the same. Their questions and
concerns are unchanged. It is remarkable. The young woman, Ms. K, who exfoliates each hand
each morning in order to remain pure, has been in the hospital for years. She does not
know where she ends and someone else begins. A pregnant nurse recently began to work on
the ward. On her first day, Ms. K. approached and circled her. She took two pas de deux
steps near, three pirouettes away, two near, three away, two near again, peering all the
while at the belly in front of her. "Hello," she said. "Are you
pregnant?" The nurse nodded. "I am," she said. You could hear the joy and,
given the times, fear in her voice. Ms. K. mulled, stepping back and forth. Many of us
would be thinking about this double-headed blessing, the poignancy and the danger of
bringing life into the present world. But Ms. K. wasn't. She had something far more
important to clarify. "I see," she said, and did a little dance. "Well, if
you're pregnant, am I?"
Elissa Ely is a psychiatrist at a state hospital in Massachusetts.
Dartmouth Murder Suspect Will Argue Insanity Defense
Harry R. Weber, Associated Press- 11/30/2001
CONCORD, N.H. -- A teen-ager accused of killing two Dartmouth College professors will
use an insanity defense at his trial, his lawyer said in court papers Friday. Robert
Tulloch, 18, of Chelsea, Vt., will argue he suffers from a ''severe mental defect or
disease and that his acts were the direct result of the mental defect or disease,''
Richard Guerriero said in the filing. Tulloch's trial is set for April 8.
Tulloch and his friend James Parker, 17, are charged with first-degree
murder in the Jan. 27 stabbing deaths of Half and Susanne Zantop in their Hanover home.
Neither a motive for the crime nor any connection between the Zantops and the suspects has
ever been given publicly. A law enforcement source has told The Associated Press the
Zantops were probably killed during a burglary gone awry. A trial date for Parker has not
been set. Prosecutors are seeking to have him tried as an adult. He was 16 at the time of
the slayings. Parker won't use an insanity defense, but will re-evaluate his strategy
given Tulloch's decision, Doug Brown, one of his lawyers, said Friday.
Prosecutors allege fingerprints and footprints in the Zantops' home
link the teens to the murders. Court documents say two military-style knives stained with
the victims' blood were found in Tulloch's bedroom. Guerriero said the defense had a
psychiatrist evaluate Tulloch. It was difficult at first to recognize the illness
due to ''Robert's intelligence and his particular personality,'' the filing says.
Prosecutor Kelly Ayotte said she learned of the planned insanity defense late Thursday,
and ''the state is fully prepared to meet this at trial.'' Judge Peter Smith will review
the defense request next week, said Grafton County Superior Court Clerk Bob Muh.
Counseling Sought by Many New York City Firefighters
Malcolm Ritter, Associated Press- 11/30/2001
NEW YORK --For many New York City firefighters, Sept. 11 is still taking a toll in
nightmares, sleepless nights, anxiety and other psychological stresses, say mental health
professionals who are helping them deal with their reactions. Social workers,
psychiatrists and psychologists have rushed to help the fire department handle the
counseling workload, and the International Association of Fire Fighters aims to raise
about $3.5 million to pay for more help. Firefighters are not required to get
counseling, but many have done it anyway, said Tom Manley, health and safety officer for
the city's 9,000-member Uniformed Firefighters Association. ''Everybody is getting drained
psychologically,'' Manley said. ''It's taking its toll.'' Some firefighters can't bring
themselves to go to ground zero any more, he said, because ''mentally they can't deal with
it.''
In an interview, one fireman recalled being curled in a fetal position
Sept. 11 in the collapsing lobby of the Marriott World Trade Center Hotel. Cement dust and
smoke choked the room. ''You had to throw up to clear your throat,'' he said. Eventually
he was able to pick his way out of the remains of the collapsed hotel, leading some others
to safety. But even now, the experience isn't over. ''I don't sleep at all at night
without medication,'' said the 20-year veteran, who asked not to be identified because he
doesn't want his colleagues to know what he's going through. He suffers nightmares
about being caught in another collapse. For a while he had bizarre out-of-body experiences
when he was with his family, feeling like he was dead and viewing the scene from above.
He'd known about 70 firefighters who died, including two he'd spoken to just minutes
before their deaths. One morning, the day after going to the funeral of one and the wake
of another, ''I found myself sitting in the crotch of a tree outside my house. I was out
of it. I knew I needed help.'' He found the names of a psychiatrist and another counselor
in a directory, and now he's seeing them a couple times a week.
At the midtown Manhattan firehouse of Battalion 9, a couple
firefighters sat around the kitchen table in the firehouse Friday, talking to counselors
who show up a few times a week from a local hospital. The firehouse lost 15 men an entire
shift on Sept. 11. The final funeral for them will be Saturday. Joseph Nardone, commander
of Battalion 9, said some of his men need counseling while others are resisting. ''But I
think that after the last funeral the guys might need it more,'' he said.
The city's firefighters ''have been through a terrible ordeal and we
want to support them,'' said psychiatrist Dr. Spencer Eth, medical director of behavioral
health services at St. Vincent's Catholic Medical Center in New York. St. Vincent's is
lending manpower to the department's counseling effort. After all, they have been
attending funeral after funeral, and given their close-knit culture, it's like losing
family members, Eth said. In the firehouse, ''your buddies aren't there anymore, and these
are deaths of young people who should not have died,'' he said. The World Trade Center
disaster claimed 343 city firefighters; before this, the largest department loss was 12 in
a 1966 fire.
Apart from the grief and the trauma at the site, there is also guilt
over having survived when friends died. And because so many died, the surviving
firefighters have not been able to fully carry out their traditional roles as surrogate
parents for the families of the dead, Eth said. So ''on top of everything else, there is
an understandable feeling of having let down their buddies,'' he said. The goal of
counseling is to keep normal reactions to all this like nightmares and anxiety from
growing into worse problems like drinking, accidents and heart attacks, Eth said.
The psychological support must continue long-term, said Therese Rando,
a psychologist and clinical director of the Institute for the Study and Treatment of Loss
in Warwick, R.I. As a specialist in traumatic loss, she has been consulted by some mental
health professionals who are working with the firefighters. For many in the fire
department, she said, the shock of Sept. 11 won't really wear off until next spring and
summer. Then, when reality fully sets in, the firefighters used to taking action to solve
problems will be unable to do anything to change the terrible reality of their losses.
They will need to take some positive steps, like memorializing their friends or even just
embarking on a new exercise program, Rando said.
Eth said St. Vincent's plans to continue helping the department conduct
counseling for at least a year. ''The memories don't go away when the headlines do,'' he
said. ''So we are going to be there for the long run.'' Mental health counseling will be
offered for the 55,000 members of the New York Police Department, to help them cope with
post-Sept. 11 trauma, police officials said. ''Ultimately, our goal is to do everything we
can to help the members of the NYPD and their families make it through these difficult
times,'' Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik said in a statement.
Daughter Speaks Out After Sharpe Gets Life Sentence
Michele Kurtz, Boston Globe, 11/30/2001
She says her father, Richard Sharpe, used to punch her in the eye and then order her to
tell people that she had fallen down the stairs. As a child, Shannon Sharpe, now 28,
watched her mother live in terror of the mean and controlling man she'd married. She saw
her cover for the man who beat her, paralyzed by threats he would kill her father or
brother if she left him. Though petrified, Karen Sharpe decided in the winter of
2000 to leave Richard Sharpe, her husband of 27 years and the father of her three
children. What finally forced her out the door was that their son, then 7, was old enough
to recognize the abuse that had come to rule her life, Shannon Sharpe said. ''It was like
living with a terrorist,'' she said in a telephone interview with the Globe from her home
in New York. ''He held her prisoner.''
Shannon Sharpe remained silent during her father's murder trial and
wasn't in court yesterday when he was sentenced to life in prison without parole for
killing her mother on July 14, 2000. But within hours of her father's arrest the next
night, Shannon Sharpe issued a statement urging prosecution ''to the fullest extent of the
law.'' Her father later evicted her from the family's Gloucester property. Shannon and
Karen Sharpe's other relatives have filed a $100 million wrongful-death lawsuit against
Richard Sharpe. This week, Shannon Sharpe offered a first-hand account of what she
called years of physical abuse, in hopes that exposing the violence that both she and her
mother suffered would help other women escape abusive relationships. ''I just wish
people wouldn't be ashamed,'' she said. ''It happens everywhere. It's amazing.''
The cross-dressing Richard Sharpe, who testified that his own father
physically and verbally abused him as a child, contended he was so mentally ill that he
didn't know what he was doing the night he killed his wife. Prone to outbursts during the
four-week trial, Sharpe yesterday grew angry and frustrated that he hadn't been allowed to
speak at his sentencing. His lawyers thought it was a bad idea. ''I have a right to
talk,'' Sharpe shouted, turning to a television camera and gesturing wildly, after court
had recessed. Court officers quickly surrounded him and held his shackled arms. When he
stood up from the defense table, his face was wrinkled into tears - the first he'd shed
during the trial. ''I loved Karen. I'm sorry for what happened,'' Sharpe cried, leaning
over court officers to be in sight of the camera. ''I loved Karen. I loved Karen.''
Afterward, Karen Sharpe's close-knit family scoffed at his
protestations as they huddled in the rain outside Essex Superior Court. Karen Sharpe's
sister, Kathleen Lembo, said she and her family over the years occasionally puzzled over
Sharpe's behavior but didn't know he was abusing her oldest sister. ''Everybody sort of
saw everything come together in a big bundle at the end,'' said Lembo, who wept in court
earlier yesterday as she spoke about the effect Karen's death had on the Sharpes' young
children, Michael, 9, and Alexandra, 6, who live with Lembo and her husband, Victor, in
Connecticut. ''I just tell women out there you have got to speak up, you have got to not
take it anymore.''
In a letter to the court, Sharpe's sister, Lauri Monopoli, said she and
Richard Sharpe's other siblings only thought their brother had a rocky marriage. She and
her brothers filed letters with the court yesterday praising Richard Sharpe's brilliance
and asking for leniency in imposing additional sentences on convictions for violating a
restraining order and illegally possessing a firearm. Superior Court Judge Christine M.
McEvoy ordered that Sharpe serve those sentences concurrently with his life sentence for
murder.
Shannon Sharpe, who is engaged to be married and works in medical
sales, came to court for a few days of the end of the trial. She sat calmly and composed,
a furrowed brow the only sign of her anxiety. But she returned to New York and did not
come back for the verdict or yesterday's sentencing because her father had tried to speak
to her in court. He previously had been disciplined in jail for calling her on the
telephone. Born in Connecticut when her parents were just teenagers, Shannon said
her father frequently slapped and punched her - particularly when she tried to protect her
mother, Sharpe's main target of abuse. ''And he'd break things of mine of sentimental
value,'' she said. Once, when she stood up to him, Richard Sharpe picked up a treasured
and fragile ''Precious Moments'' memento Shannon's aunt had given her for being in her
wedding, and smashed it against the wall.
Shannon Sharpe said she ''pleaded and begged'' for her mother to leave
her father. ''The woman was so pure and so kind and so generous and so passionate,'' she
said. ''He is just the opposite. He is an evil, manipulative, cowardly man.'' Still, Karen
Sharpe tried to steal bits of happiness where she could. When Michael was born, Shannon
was in college, and Karen became a full-time mom again. She was thrilled. Alexandra
arrived three years later. Even after she left her husband, Karen Sharpe remained
''deathly afraid'' of him, her daughter said. A few weeks before the murder, Shannon and
her mother briefly discussed hiring a bodyguard.
With the trial behind her, Shannon said she's getting on with her life.
She spends several days a month with her younger brother and sister, who play soccer and
basketball and have many new friends. Still, Shannon, who's planning a fall wedding, won't
have a mother to help her pick out a gown. Last year, a relative visiting Alexandra's
school spotted a bulletin board of students' Christmas wishes. Alexandra's: ''I wish my
mommy didn't die.'' ''You go through all this and you think it's an end to something,''
Shannon Sharpe said. ''And you get the verdict you needed - and the sadness is still
there.''
Insanity Defense Has Poor Success Record in New Hampshire
J.M. Hirsch, Associated Press- 11/30/2001
CONCORD, N.H. -- Former state prosecutors say the insanity defense historically has
rarely if ever worked in homicide cases in New Hampshire. John Kissinger, a former
assistant attorney general, and Charles Putnam, the former head of the attorney general's
criminal bureau, said Friday they don't recall the insanity defense ever being used
successfully at trial. ''Historically in New Hampshire, the defense of insanity has not
frequently been successful. Indeed to my knowledge it has never been successful,'' said
Putnam, whose tenure with the office dates to the early 1980s. Kissinger said that may be
because juries don't seem to give them much credibility. ''I don't think New Hampshire
juries are particularly receptive to an insanity defense and I think where there has been
a legitimate issue of insanity the state has been very willing to stipulate to someone's
insanity,'' Kissinger said.
The issue was raised late Friday when one of two Vermont teen-agers
charged with killing two Dartmouth College professors indicated he would use insanity as a
defense at trial. Robert Tulloch, 18, of Chelsea, Vt., is charged with first-degree murder
in the Jan. 27 stabbing deaths of Half and Susanne Zantop in their Hanover home.
Kissinger, who tried three homicide cases where insanity was used, said it isn't an
uncommon defense in New Hampshire. He said it can indicate what defense lawyers think of
their chances at trial. ''It is raised pretty frequently in homicide cases, particularly
in cases where there is very strong evidence of guilt,'' he said.
In 1990, Robert McLaughlin, a Hampton police officer, unsuccessfully
argued insanity and was convicted of first-degree murder for shooting a man in 1998. In
1992, a jury didn't buy the insanity defense when James Colbert blamed the murders of his
wife and three daughters on a troubled childhood. He was sentenced to four consecutive
life sentences. And insanity hasn't worked in non-homicide cases, either. In 1998, William
McCallum, a former assistant attorney general, was convicted of possessing hundreds of
stolen artworks, books and computers, despite having argued insanity.
Kissinger said an insanity defense can be handled several ways: The
state can agree with the defense, in which case there is no trial. The defense can admit
guilt, in which case there is no criminal trial, but there is one to determine sanity. The
defense can maintain innocence and insanity, requiring two trials, one to determine guilt,
and one for sanity. The defense can maintain innocence and insanity and ask that the jury
determine guilt and sanity during the same trial.
Kissinger said the defense must prove insanity by ''clear and
convincing evidence,'' a lesser standard of proof than the ''beyond a reasonable doubt''
by which prosecutors must establish guilt. One risk of insanity defenses is that they can
force the accused to maintain innocence at the same time as claiming to have been insane
when committing the crime, Kissinger said. ''You're trying to argue that he's innocent at
the same time that you're arguing that he's insane,'' he said. ''There's a danger that you
lessen the credibility in your innocence argument.''
In Tulloch's case, the insanity defense may help prosecutors another
way, as well. It could give prosecutors an opportunity to indirectly question the teen
about the murders, Kissinger said. Because defendants are not required to talk to
investigators, or to take the stand during their trial, cases can go to court without
prosecutors ever having an opportunity to question the person charged. But Kissinger said
if the defense argues that Tulloch was insane at the time of the killings, an expert
witness for the state such as a psychologist would have to be allowed to question the teen
about the murders. Tulloch's trial is expected to begin in April, though this development
could delay that. |