| Noteworthy News Articles on Mental Health Topics, May 10-17, 2003
Parents, Shopping for Discipline, Turn to Tough Schools Abroad
Tim Weiner, New York Times- 5/10/2003
ENSENADA, Mexico - Ryan Fraidenburgh was 14 when he was brought here shackled, kicking
and screaming. Two men carrying handcuffs and leg irons came for him at his mother's home
in Sacramento, Calif., shoved him into a van and bound him hand and foot. They drove him
12 hours south, over the Mexican border, into a high-walled compound near here called Casa
by the Sea. "It was nighttime," Ryan recalled. "I look around and I see
kids sleeping on cement. I was really, really scared. The big honcho, Mauricio, said, 'You
don't speak English here.' I didn't know how to speak Spanish." Ryan quickly learned
the rules: stay silent, be compliant, don't look up, don't look out the window, don't
speak unless spoken to. The punishments for breaking the rules included solitary
confinement, lying on the floor in a small room, nose to the ground, often for days on
end.
Ryan was not a criminal. He was only skipping school, his parents said
in telephone interviews. But in August 2000, they said, in the middle of a bitter divorce
and custody battle, they decided to send him away to Casa by the Sea, which calls itself a
"specialty boarding school" for behavior modification. Like hundreds of other
parents, the Fraidenburghs made their choice largely on the basis of a glossy brochure and
a call to a toll-free number in Utah. They came to regret their choice.
The idea of sending a child to such a program in Mexico was unheard of
a decade ago. But in the United States behavior-modification programs and boarding schools
for troubled youths have faced increasing legal and licensing challenges over the past few
years. More and more are moving abroad -- some to Mexico, Central America. or the.
Caribbean -- where they operate largely under the regulation radar and where some employ
minimum-wage custodians more than teachers or therapists, say government officials,
education consultants and clinical psychologists.
The behavior-modification business is booming at Casa by the Sea, on
Mexico's Pacific Coast, the largest of 11 affiliated programs with roughly 2,200 youths,
about half of them in Mexico, Costa Rica and Jamaica. The programs are run by a small
group of businessmen based in St. George, Utah, under the banner of the World Wide
Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, or Wwasps, and Teen Help, the program's
main marketing arm.
Over the past seven years, local governments and State Department
officials have investigated Wwasps-affiliated programs in Mexico, the Czech Republic and
Samoa on charges of physical abuse and immigration violations. The Mexican program, in
Cancun, and the Czech program closed, and their owners left those countries saying they
feared unjust charges. The Samoan program cut its affiliation with Wwasps.
Ken Kay, the president of Wwasps, would not allow a reporter to visit
Casa by the Sea; Dace Goulding, the program's director, declined to answer any questions.
But Mr. Kay, responding to inquiries in writing from his office in. Utah, said no charge
of abuse had ever been proven against any of the programs in any court. "We are about
getting families back together," he said in a written statement. "We are not for
everyone, and there are very few but vociferous critics of not just us but any youth
intervention." He described many of the program's critics as parents who feel they
have been "manipulated, brainwashed or duped" or who are battling through
divorce and taking their anger out "by making us look terrible."
In telephone interviews, eight teenagers who were formerly in Casa by
the Sea described a system in which the youths try to ascend six "levels"
through a system of rewards and punishments, including being sent to "R and R,"
a small, bare isolation room, often for days on end. Discipline, not education, was the
rule, they said. For Laura Hamel, 17, of Vienna, Va., who counts herself as a success
story, it was a slow two-year ascent to graduation in March. She said she was demoted from
Level 3 -- back to Level 1 after giving a weeping, lonely friend a hug and a kiss on the
cheek at Thanksgiving. Affection of that kind is forbidden.
A youth who rises to Levels 4, 5 and 6 can become a "junior staff
member" and "participate in the discipline process" against lower-level
youths, Casa's contract with parents says. "The authority is in your hands,"
said Ryan Pink, 19, of El Paso, who reached Level 5 at Casa. "You can discipline
kids. The younger kids -- they were constantly being restrained, being punished, put in R
and R for four or five days. Nose to the wall. Or nose to the ground. And at night you
sleep in the hallways."
Many parents and youths say the behavior-management system of
discipline and punishment scares youths into sobriety obedience. Others -- parents and
youths formerly enrolled, education experts, government authorities and a former Wwasps
program director -- say the programs profit from struggling parents unable to handle their
depressed, delinquent, defiant or drug- abusing children.
The financial success of Casa by the Sea is evident. Its enrollment has
nearly tripled, from about 200 youths when it opened in 1998 to more than 570 today,
almost all American teenagers. Already among the biggest programs of its kind outside the
United States, Casa by the Sea has just spun off another program for those 18 and over.
Tuition and fees at Casa by the Sea ran about $30,000 a year, half of
what some United States-based programs cost. Its staff members "do not need and may
not necessarily have" teaching credentials, Casa's contract with parents plainly
states. Lon Woodbury, publisher of Woodbury Reports, which rates schools and programs for
troubled teenagers inside and outside the United States, said one reason that American
programs have moved abroad is "to avoid the laws and regulations of the States."
He added, "They can hire minimum-wage staff and still charge stateside prices."
Profit margins and growth within the programs run by Wwasps appear
solid. Teen Help, the affiliation's main marketing arm, was the single biggest corporate
campaign contributor in the state of Utah in the 2002 election cycle, donating $215,290 to
Republican campaigns, according to online federal election records posted in March. Mr.
Kay, the Wwasps president, said that the proof of the programs' success is the way in
which "behavior of students generally changes drastically." The organization's
internal surveys, he said, proved that "more than 98 percent of the schools' parents
are completely satisfied." He wrote, "No wonder these are the fastest growing
schools of their kind in the world!! "
The overseas "specialty boarding school" industry is growing
so fast that United States consular officials in overseas embassies say they have no idea
how many such programs exist. "No authorities in Mexico control these
institutions," said Elisa Ledesma, a lawyer at the American Consulate in Tijuana.
Consular officers demanded and received access to several such programs in Mexico, one
official said, after they "heard horror stories from parents."
The consular officers have the power, under the Vienna Convention, to
visit overseas programs to check on the well-being of American citizens under 18. In
January, after several such visits, the State Department issued a notice on "behavior
modification facilities" in Mexico, Costa Rica and Jamaica. The programs may
"isolate the children in relatively remote sites" and restrict their contact
with the outside world, it said.
At least seven programs in Utah, Montana, South Carolina and New York
are Wwasps affiliates, according to the organization's Web site; at least three have faced
legal challenges. Utah state officials say they are reviewing the license of the flagship
Wwasps program, Cross Creek Manor, and that a second program, Majestic Ranch, is operating
without a proper license. Six weeks ago, according to the state attorney general's office
in Utah, a director of Majestic Ranch entered into a court agreement to have no
unsupervised contact with children after he was charged with misdemeanor child abuse.
Attorneys for both programs contest the licensing challenges. South Carolina officials
have fined a third Wwasps program, Carolina Springs Academy, $5,000 for operating without
a license.
While some dissatisfied parents have sued Wwasps and its programs, the
contract that parents sign with Casa by the Sea sets high hurdles for them. It states
plainly that the program "does not accept responsibility for services written in
sales materials or brochures" or promises made by "staff or public relations
personnel" and that any dispute between a parent and the program must be settled in a
Mexican court, not in the United States.
The Wwasps programs market themselves under a multitude of interlinked
Web sites. Their sales personnel offer thousands of dollars in incentives to adults who
recruit new youths or host Web sites advertising the programs. Some parents said in
interviews that they enrolled their children in programs they had never visited after
browsing Web sites, brochures and videotapes depicting happy children in a wholesome
setting. "I sent him there sight unseen," said Patti Reddoch, of Sweeny,
Tex., who considered Dundee Ranch for her son, Edmund Brumaghin, now 17, but chose Casa by
the Sea instead. "The music he was listening to started getting darker and he was
getting more into the drugs, and that's when I decided I needed to do something. "So
I went on the Internet and started searching around and found the Wwasp program. I
contacted them and made the arrangements, and that's pretty much it. It didn't take me any
time at all." Mrs. Reddoch, speaking by telephone, said she then hired an
"escort service" familiar with Casa by the Sea to handcuff and transport her son
away at 5 am. one Sunday last September. That morning, her son cursed her bitterly, but
now his attitude is changing, she said. "I am very pleased with the school,"
said Ms. Reddoch, who said she visited Casa by the Sea once, for a weekend, last January.
"I've started putting out brochures for referrals. I would recommend Casa to
anyone."
Reality may differ from the brochures, however. "Everyone has a
shaved head," Michael Zieghelboim, who was formerly enrolled at Casa by the Sea, said
in a telephone interview. "They walk around like zombies. Most of the staff have no
training." "Casa by the Sea was the scariest thing that ever happened to
me," siad Mr. Zieghelboim, who now lives with his father in El Salvador. He said that
despite falling behind in his education at Casa by the Sea -- at 17, he is now in the 10th
grade -- he rates himself a success. "If I had never gone there, I'd probably still
be doing cocaine," he said.
This kind of tough discipline is an attraction for many exasperated
parents. The program runs "a very tight ship," said Virginia Day, of Redmond,
Wash., who sent her son, Gabriel, 15, to the program in July. "The staff that works
most closely with the kids are not necessarily professionals, and I know that this is an
issue," said Ms. Day, who called herself a very satisfied customer. "This is not
a school that specializes in a therapeutic component." Carol Maxym, an educational
consultant in Maryland, said: "What they are looking for at Casa is compliance.
Compliance is easy, if you break the kid down enough. And compliance is cheap." She
added, "The parents often don't realize what's going on."
Youths and staff at other overseas Wwasps programs have described harsh
conditions. One was Aaron Kravig, now 19. He said he contracted scabies, untreated for six
months, ate meals of watery porridge and fish entrails, and was schooled almost solely
with "emotional growth" videos at Tranquility Bay, the Wwasps-affiliated program
in Jamaica, according to a transcript of sworn testimony he gave last year at a Virginia
state court hearing.
In Costa Rica, Ms. Knight, the former director of the Wwasps-affiliated
Academy at Dundee Ranch, resigned in August after sending a letter to the national
minister of child welfare calling for the program to be shut down. The letter said the
program was "hiring unqualified, untrained, staff" and providing "the bare
minimum of food and living essentials." It said the program "takes financial
advantage of parents in crisis, and puts teens in physical and emotional risk,"
The speed with which some parents choose an overseas
behavioral-modification program for their children baffles some educational consultants.
"I find it incredible that parents would send their kids off to some place they've
heard about on the Internet," Mr. Woodbury said. Ms. Maxym, author of "Teens in
Turmoil A Path to Change for parents, Adolescents and their Families" (Viking
Penguin, 2000) said, "I find it interesting that parents will spend less time finding
a school for their child than buying a new car."
Ryan Fraidenburgh's father, Bob, an aerospace engineering executive,
said he had only glanced at Casa by the Sea's "brochures that looked like Club
Med." He said he removed Ryan from the program by himself in January 2001 after
deciding he had been too hasty. "We made a huge mistake," he said. "Until
the day I die I'll regret that." Ryan's mother, Carolyn, said "We were expecting
treatment, not a minimum-wage person to watch over your kid like he was an animal in a
cage."
One School That Relies On Therapy
BAHIA DE KINO, Mexico - Joe Quaglio, a 17-year-old from the suburbs who acts like he grew
up in the ghetto, is standing in front of his peers, 15 teenage boys, throwing his old
life away. Newspaper clippings about old friends, one shot in a drug deal, one serving 30
years in jail, flutter out of his hands and into the trash. Out goes an old journal. Out
go the Chuck Taylor sneakers and an old gang bandana. His fellow students embrace him.
This ritual takes him one step toward graduating from one of the only schools in the world
that would have had him: Positive Impact, on. the shores of the Sea of Cortes, a long way
from the culture and conflicts of the United States.
While bigger institutions like Casa by the Sea offer
behavior-modification programs, there are other schools with a different approach toward
teenagers in trouble. One of the best, in the opinion of several educational consultants
in the United States whose profession is matching teenagers and parents with such schools,
is Positive Impact. A four-year-old school with 60 boys, 60 miles from the nearest city,
Hermosillo, Mexico, the school relies on individual and group therapy, not behavior
modification. The mood is one of cooperation, not control. Staff members have
undergraduate and graduate degrees in fields like psychological counseling and education.
Almost all the boys here are from well-to-do families -- they have to be, because tuition
at Positive Impact runs close to $60,000 a year. Many of the boys say they started
drinking and taking drugs at 12.
Hughes Pope, an intelligent, friendly, calm 17-year-old from Greenland,
N.H., said he started smoking and selling marijuana in the eighth grade five years ago and
hit bottom when he stole his father's prescription pain pills. "My parents were at a
loss as to what to do with me, and I knew I was driving a wedge between them," he
said, gazing out to sea. "It was a never-ending battle. My plan was to wear my
parents down to where they didn't care anymore."
Then, last year, an escort service - two big men, hired by his parents
- took him from: his home into a nineweek wilderness camp in Utah called Second Nature.
After that experience sobered him, he arrived at Positive Impact. "There has never
been any abuse here,'' he said. "People back home thought I was going to come back a
therapeutic zombie. But there are clear-cut expectations here. People are focused. You
learn to live." After a year at Positive impact, he and his teachers said, he is
headed home; without formally graduating from the program, to a different high school in
New Hampshire and later, he expects, a small liberal arts, college. The alternative, he
said, would have been prison or worse.
Not all the students are success stories, and not all will be, said the
school's director, John Andersen. About a third graduate from the program. There are no
long-term studies showing how these teenagers will fare as adults. But Joe Quaglio -- Q,
to his friends says he is coming 'out of a hard, ugly cocoon. He used to live in a state
of rage, he said, adding, "Jail or death were my only two options." His friends
and teachers say they think he now has a chance to make it.
Abuse Survivor Starts Program to Help Kids
Alan Bernstein, Houston Chronicle- 5/10/2003
Among the eye-popping tattoos that cover much of Anthony Calleo's body, one on his
stomach shows two swallows holding a banner. The banner, encircling his navel, says,
"Save me from hell" in Latin. "It's pretty self-explanatory," he said.
Every college student's graduation is bound to involve a story of perseverance and
personal growth. But Calleo's graduation today from the University of St. Thomas with a
major in theology and philosophy caps a story that includes sexual abuse, drug abuse and
crime.
After he emerged from that purgatory, Calleo, 23, co-founded an
after-school center in the working-class neighborhoods just north of downtown Houston. The
idea behind the Stop Abuse Forever Center, now a year old and run completely by teens and
young adults, is that no more kids should have to endure what he did. Calleo's
tattoos and his side career in pizza delivery color the story even more.
The center faces Jefferson Davis High School. Sitting in his office,
surrounded by objects such as a pair of skateboards, a piņata, a tambourine and a set of
children's drawings, the intense young man unfolded his tale. While living with his
mother in northwest Houston, he was sexually abused multiple times by a male neighbor a
few years older than he. In fear, he did not report the assaults. "I always knew 'it
happened' instead of thinking it happened to me," he said, jabbing at a desk handle.
"It was like something happening to somebody on TV."
The psychological damage was done. "You lose a sense of
self-control, a sense of self-worth, and you are scared all the time. Some people fold,
some people become distrustful and deceitful, some people become real violent."
Calleo said it was the latter two for him. From age 13 to 16, he said, he was a brawling,
burglarizing, lying, amphetamine-abusing, hard-drinking stain on himself and the city. He
said he often deserved to be arrested and never was, that he thought about killing himself
and obviously didn't proceed. He said his mother, Cynthia Calleo, supported him with
love and used unemployment benefits to pay for his enrollment in a private middle school.
Calleo is deeply devoted to Catholicism now, but he said his turning
point at 16 was anything but spiritual. He developed respiratory and digestive
diseases. "I woke up one time from all these amphetamines," he said. "I
remember not knowing where I was. I was just dead. It wrecked me, and I just came to and
said, `What the hell are you doing?' " Calleo said he decided at that moment to avoid
death "more out of spite and hate than out of a new appreciation for living." He
embraced the Straight Edge movement, a strident culture rooted in a strain of punk music
that preaches against alcohol, drugs, tobacco and, sometimes, animal products. At
St. Thomas High School around the same time, a theology teacher inspired Calleo to think
about ethical and political issues and to see a connection between Catholic teachings and
the anti-establishment message of punk rock songs. At the University of St. Thomas, Calleo
and roommate Mark Valdez came up with the idea for the center, known as SAFE.
With about 30 steady volunteers and donations from a variety of private
sources, they run the center at a two-story building rented from a church. Kids, mostly
11- to 14-year-olds, come there for tutoring, computer classes, dance instruction, movie
nights, pizza parties and other activities. They pay 25 cents a day for the services.
Calleo said he and the staff keep an eye on a nearby stretch of sidewalk where preteens
take their after-school disputes. "We break up a lot of fights," he said. And
through Community in Schools Houston, a dropout prevention program, Calleo meets with
students at their schools in the neighborhood, counseling them about the tripwires of
adolescence.
Calleo said he and Valdez hope to earn a salary for their SAFE Center
work someday. For now Calleo delivers pizzas. In the fall, he will start pursuing a
master's degree in social work at the University of Houston. He wants to get a doctorate
in theology eventually, then "teach at a university and write books and stuff."
Along the way, he quotes theologians and authors and talks about "matrices of
different subcontexts" in his life.
His left arm is covered with tattooed scenes and characters from one of
his favorite movies, The Nightmare Before Christmas. His right arm is festooned
with fanciful versions of sailor tattoos: sea creatures and an anchor. Calleo said the
tattoos are merely artistic statements that he acquired after leaving drugs and crime
behind. Saying that they aren't connected to his work with children, he refused to have
the tattoos photographed. But some of the tattoos have deeper meaning. Calleo said there
are angels on his legs, reflecting his religious devotion. He said he withstood a lot of
pain to the get the birds applied to his abdomen. And so, after all, they are a relevant
symbol. Like his story, one of pain and grace.
A Dozen Doctors in Appalachia Arrested for Painkiller Prescriptions
Roger Alford, Associated Press- 5/11/2003
PIKEVILLE, Ky. -- More than a dozen Appalachian doctors, many of them recruited to work
in the medically underserved region, have been taken away from their patients in handcuffs
for allegedly supplying drug addicts with powerful narcotics. In eastern Kentucky alone,
seven small-town doctors are in prison or on their way for illegally prescribing drugs
like the painkiller OxyContin. At least six others have been arrested in the hills of West
Virginia, Virginia, and southern Ohio.
Advocates for the mountain region say that while the loss of so many
doctors leaves a void, in these circumstances, the departures can only improve medical
care. ''As badly as we need more physicians, we certainly don't need the type that will
violate their oaths and do much more harm than good,'' said Ewell Balltrip, executive
director of the Kentucky Appalachian Commission.
Federal and state law enforcement agencies began cracking down on
wayward physicians in Appalachia in 2000, after OxyContin, intended for cancer patients
and others suffering from severe pain, began showing up in large quantities on the black
market. The first eastern Kentucky physician snared in the crackdown Dr. Ali Sawaf, 61, of
Harlan had turned to illegally prescribing OxyContin and other painkillers after he lost
his $250,000-a-year job at a regional clinic. Assistant U.S. Attorney Roger West said at
the time that Sawaf handed out prescriptions almost as quickly as he could write them. The
latest physician to plead guilty, Dr. David Procter, 52, of South Shore, traded pain
killers for sex. He admitted to a federal judge that he had sexual relations with two
female patients after they became hooked on the drugs.
Most of the doctors caught in the past two years had been recruited to
the region to help care for rural residents, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Pat Molloy.
''They may not have stepped over the line before they got here, but clearly they were
corruptible,'' Molloy said. Legitimate doctors have nothing to fear when they
appropriately prescribe medications, Molloy said. The doctors who have been prosecuted, he
said, were flagrant violators.
The problem is not confined to Appalachia. A Florida doctor was
convicted of manslaughter in the OxyContin overdose deaths of four patients. A Connecticut
physician, nicknamed ''Dr. Feelgood'' by police for the prescriptions he wrote for
OxyContin and other pain killers, was convicted last year on multiple counts. Authorities
blame the abuse of OxyContin for scores of overdose deaths in the Appalachian region and
beyond. If taken properly, the drug is released slowly into the body. But abusers
circumvent the time-release by crushing the pills and inhaling or injecting the powder to
get the same kind of euphoric high that heroin brings.
Larry Bailey of Grayson said he believes his son would still be alive
if unscrupulous doctors had not been so willing to feed his addiction. At first, Paul
Bailey, 35, had a legitimate need for medication to ease severe back pain. But the last
time he visited Dr. Rodolfo Santos of South Shore, he left with prescriptions for
painkillers, tranquilizers and muscle relaxants. It was a combination of those pills that
claimed his life.
Santos was convicted last month of overprescribing drugs. Larry Bailey
had been in the courtroom during Santos' trial. ''Being angry doesn't solve anything,''
Larry Bailey said. ''But I was thrilled to see him being put out of business.' The jury
recommended that Santos, who was recruited to work in eastern Kentucky, serve 16 years in
prison. He could be eligible for parole in a little more than three years. Procter, the
physician who owned the clinic where Santos worked, pleaded guilty in April to one count
of conspiracy and two counts of illegally prescribing controlled substances, and faces 10
to 12 years in prison.
In an effort to get more doctors into rural Appalachia, area leaders
got a medical school established in 1997. As of this month, the Pikeville College School
of Osteopathic Medicine will have graduated 168 doctors. The new doctors will
immediately begin to narrow the physician-to-patient ratio, easily replacing the
physicians who have been sent to prison, said Dr. John Strosnider, dean of the college.
Strosnider said he has no doubt that, as a result of the crackdown, legitimate physicians
are more careful about prescribing OxyContin and other potent pain killers. ''They're
leery that patients may be trying to fool them,'' Strosnider said.
Drug Court Effectiveness Still up for Debate
Associated Press, 5/11/2003
PORTLAND, Maine -- It's been 20 months since Maine set up its drug court, an innovative
drug treatment program designed to cut off crime at its roots. But so far, only 31 have
successfully completed the treatment. Another 61 failed to live by the rules and were
expelled before graduation. Advocates for the Maine Adult Drug Treatment Court
program say it's too soon to say what those numbers mean or if they mean anything at all.
They say that drug court clients are all addicts with long criminal histories, and that
relapses should be expected. And the program is too new, they add, to product
statistically meaningful results. But the disappointing early returns have some top
officials questioning whether the program can succeed in its present form, and asking if
it's living up to its promise. ''In most of these cases, people are doing the time they
were going to do anyway,'' Cumberland County District Attorney Stephanie Anderson said.
''There are some red flags here.''
Drug court gives drug offenders a simple deal: Complete a rigorous
yearlong drug-treatment program, or go to prison and serve a long sentence. Clients must
attend at least five meetings of a 12-Step program each week, abide by a curfew, submit to
surprise urinalysis tests at least twice a week and do volunteer work or go to school if
they aren't employed. Each week, all drug court defendants appear before a judge. If they
fail in any way, they are instantly punished, often by a quick trip back to jail. The drug
court has six sites around the state, and it now handles fewer than 200 cases. Most people
who apply are not admitted, and almost twice as many are expelled as graduate.
John Babbitt, 32, is among those who failed and succeeded. Babbitt was
arrested for dealing heroin at the age of 19 and received a mostly suspended, 25-year
prison sentence. He was released on probation, which he constantly violated, and was sent
back to serve more and more of his sentence, eventually doing eight years in prison. Drug
court at first appeared to work, and Babbitt seemed free from a heroin habit that had
controlled him since he was a teenager. A year ago, he became one of the program's first
graduates. But three months later, a staggering, bleary-eyed Babbitt caught the eye of a
clerk at the Cumberland Farms convenience store in Windham, who called police. Babbitt
tested positive for methadone and other drugs and was sent back to prison for two months.
Today, Babbitt is married and trying to rebuild his life. He has stayed clear of trouble
with the law, but has decided to control his drug problem with methadone maintenance
instead of the abstinence he learned in drug court. ''I slipped. It happens in recovery,''
Babbitt said. ''If I didn't have drug court I probably wouldn't have recovered as well as
I did.'' For Lisa Nash, a probation officer for 16 years, even Babbitt's case doesn't make
her lose hope. ''Sometimes I get discouraged with the failures, but then I think, this kid
still has a shot,'' Nash said. ''A year of being clean is still an accomplishment.''
In Cumberland County, four of the first nine drug court graduates have
violated their probation and ended up back in prison. In York County, three of the first
eight graduates failed to stay out of trouble after completing the program, and Penobscot
County reports three of its 13 drug court graduates did not stay sober. In Androscoggin,
Oxford and Washington counties, drug court officials report no relapses among graduates.
Michigan Beds for Mentally Ill to Drop to Under 1,000
Sara Scott, Ann Arbor News- 5/11/2003
LANSING -- Gov. Jennifer Granholm is closing one of the few remaining state psychiatric
hospitals, even as advocates argue that there are not enough long-term-care beds for the
mentally ill. It's a tricky situation for a new governor who has pledged to protect
Michigan's most vulnerable populations and simultaneously balance the state's bleeding
budget. The state expects to earn $64.6 million by closing and selling the 250-bed
Northville Psychiatric Hospital, which sits on a 453-acre campus in northwest Wayne
County. The last 80-some patients are expected to be moved out by the end of May, and the
facility will officially close in July. That leaves three state psychiatric hospitals for
adults: Caro in the Thumb, Walter Reuther in Westland and Kalamazoo Psychiatric Hospital
in Kalamazoo. Hawthorne in Northville is a psychiatric hospital for children.
Once Northville closes, there will be 981 beds left at state hospitals.
Advocates say the state needs at least several hundred more. "It puts pressure on a
system that just isn't ready for it," said Mark Reinstein, executive director of the
Mental Health Association of Michigan. "We understand the challenges she's faced with
But this is not the answer."
Closing Northville was actually former Gov. John Engler's idea,
announcing plans just over a year ago to sell Northville. At the time, state officials
said the closure wouldn't happen for three years. Advocates had hoped Granholm, who took
office in January, would postpone the closure. But Granholm officials said they decided to
push forward for several reasons, including budget trouble and staff shortages. Engler's
budget crunchers had already factored closure savings into the budget, so given the
state's $1.7 billion deficit, there was no money to keep it open. On top of that, about
700 employees at the state's psychiatric hospitals opted to take early retirement last
year. "When that happens you really have to start talking about consolidating,"
said Patrick Barrie, the director of state mental health services. Another key
factor is that Granholm and her administrators are strong proponents of
deinstitutionalization, said Janet Olszewski, director of the Community Health Department,
which oversees mental health services. "We believe that people, generally
speaking, should be served in their communities instead of in state hospitals,"
Olszewski said.
Michigan began closing psychiatric hospitals and mainstreaming the
mentally ill into their local communities in 1972, as part of a national trend. Over the
next three decades, state officials reduced the number of mentally ill in state hospitals
from 17,000 to fewer than 1,000 once Northville closes. Local CMHs also contract with area
hospitals for another 3,000 beds.
But advocates for the mentally ill -- most of whom strongly support the
concept of deinstitutionalization -- say the state has gone too far. Many of the mentally
ill ended up in jails or prisons because they did not get adequate support or structure,
Reinstein said. Two years ago, a coalition of advocacy organizations issued a report
calling for at least an additional 400 long-term care beds. Closing Northville will only
compound the problem, advocates say.
"We haven't seen it yet, but any time a facility closes (it puts
pressure on the community health programs)," said Dan Russell, director of the
Genesee County Community Mental Health. "And a lot of times the funds don't always
follow that person into the community." That has been a key issue for the mentally
ill and their advocates. While they support the concept of deinstitutionalization, they've
maintained that the state's motives were more about saving money than doing right by the
mentally ill. Last year there were 197,894 mentally ill people receiving services through
CMHs statewide. The state spends about $1.6 billion on Community Mental Health programs.
In Genesee County, the CMH contracts with several community hospitals to care for patients
who need inpatient care. "There are many weekends when it's difficult to find a
bed," Russell said.
Still it is a difficult situation for many advocates who would very
much like to see the state close Northville, which is outdated and in many ways a
disturbing reminder of the past. "The state has always said it was going to close
Northville and we're all for that," said Elmer Cerano, the executive director of the
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service Inc., which advocates for the mentally ill.
"But the plan was to have a better option for them."
All states are struggling with how to develop a community-based system
that provides enough structure and support, Barrie said. "We want to make sure that
to the extent possible, people can live in their community, live in their homes, carry out
their lives, but with the adequate supports," Olszewski said. "But we also
understand that sometimes, for some people, that's not going to be possible."
Life Skills Program Meets Mental Illness Needs
Tracy Davis, Ann Arbor News- 5/11/2003
A group of adults is gathered around a conference table on a Thursday morning,
workbooks in front of them. Today's assignment: Learning about their illnesses,
understanding symptoms and side-effects of medication, and how to control them. The group
is taking part in Life Skills, a program at the University of Michigan designed to help
people with mental illnesses learn how to cope with various aspects of life.
The topics might seem elementary: nutrition, exercise, time management,
budgeting, tracking medication side-effects, socializing, basic problem-solving,
expressing feelings, developing assertiveness and awareness of personal space. But many
people -- even those who don't have to deal with a mental illness -- struggle with these
issues. And for those with mental illnesses, devoting time and attention to those basics
can be even harder. It's critical knowledge to help keep them from getting into a crisis,
mental health professionals say.
For example, a bipolar client might attend a family gathering with
better skills to deal with confrontations. Those tools could ultimately help prevent him
from spiraling into a stress-induced crisis, going off his medication or eventually being
hospitalized. With the tools the program gives them to adjust to and deal with different
situations, the students are better equipped to handle life's curve balls.
The program's success and growth has drawn statewide attention and is
beginning to attract interest from health care providers outside of Michigan. As providers
struggle to meet the basic needs of the mentally ill in increasingly underfunded programs,
Life Skills has gotten the attention of those who recognize its potential for preventing
crises in people for whom there are fewer and fewer resources.
Life Skills began at the University of Michigan Hospital in the late
1980s when Nancy Mann, a nurse in the psychiatry department, saw a need to teach
schizophrenic patients how to deal with everyday situations after they were discharged
from the hospital. "There were a lot of places doing bits and pieces of the
program," said Mann. "There wasn't anything that actually covered anything in
organized sequence. We were trying different approaches, and it suddenly hit us that to
have clients work together in a group setting might work better. "Being in a class
setting and being with their peers, they were able to exchange more ideas, to talk about
what worked and what didn't work for them. As the groups progressed, you could see them
come together as a class, as a unit to figure out a problem. That was really important to
them."
The program remained in-house for years. But as hospital stays got
shorter, there was not enough time to teach the classes to patients before they were
discharged. The program was shelved. In 1998, Mann and a fellow nurse, Bill Borem, started
teaching the class on an outpatient basis. Today, they're up to 10 classes a week in group
homes and drop-in classes in Ann Arbor, Detroit, Ypsilanti, Adrian and Holly. Students
include people with a variety of diagnoses, such as bipolar disorder, manic depression,
severe depression, schizophrenia and post-traumatic stress syndrome. And the basic skills
the classes teach have had a lasting impact. Some students keep repeating the 20-class
series. "They get something new out of it every time," Borem said.
Successes by the students are obvious, Mann said. One of her favorite
stories was a man who wanted to get a high school diploma. During a class on goal setting,
he pulled a piece of paper from his pocket. It was information on how to take the GED
test. Together, the class brainstormed ways to help him prepare for the test. "I will
always remember that day he pulled out that crumpled paper," Mann said. "He was
able to reach out to his support system who could help him work on some of that
stuff." Greg Buchrestean of Ypsilanti Township, who goes to Thursday meetings
periodically, said he enjoys not only the skills he learned, but the friends he has made.
When Buchrestean, who has a bipolar disorder diagnosis, was so excited about a trip to
Florida that he packed a month in advance, others understood why. "I've made a lot of
good friends," said Buchrestean, a constantly smiling and outspoken member of the
group.
And for students in group homes or institutions, teaching them ways to
feel they have more control over their environment is critical, program teachers say.
"For so many people we see, they don't have a lot of options," Mann said.
"Some don't have the option of living with family. They also may not be able to pick
who they're living with. Every single person wants to feel like they have some control
over their environment. If we can teach them to get that into their home situation ... it
helps them feel safer in their home environment."
Life Skills is getting calls from all over the state with requests from
communities and group homes. But because the program is grant-funded to pay the salaries
of Borem and Mann while they are teaching, and a couple of other staffers, traveling long
distances to teach the class isn't feasible at the moment. Robert Johnson, a social worker
and marketing director of the program, said the next step is a "train-the-trainer
program." The group hopes to instruct health care professionals around the state and
eventually, the nation, how to teach the life skills program.
"The problem is there aren't very many programs out there to do
this," said Mona Goldman, a research investigator in the U-M psychiatry department
who has been evaluating the effectiveness of the program. "This one has a couple of
advantages. First of all, it's very flexible. It's been used a variety of settings."
And it can help classes in which students are very highly functioning, or those who are
not functioning very well, she said. Also, the one-hour, once-a-week class format works
well for most students. "By having that relationship (with students) for 20 weeks, we
can connect with them," Borem said. "I think we're having contact with all of
the clients that they're not getting elsewhere."
Program leaders hope to expand Life Skills into other parts of the
Midwest. As quickly as it is growing, they expect it could be available nationwide in five
to 10 years, if they can get enough funding to train other health care workers. "You
can't deinstitutionalize people and put them on the street and not fund community
programs," Borem said. "It's a serious situation facing all of the communities
in the country."
Studies Help Police Follow California Meth Culture
Akilah Johnson, Los Angeles Times- 5/12/2003
Many small-time methamphetamine users will be standing at their stoves Tuesday, cooking
up their weekly stash of the drug. A new report by Southern California narcotics experts
finds that many addicts opt to cook a personal supply of the white crystalline stimulant
a cheap and highly addictive substitute for cocaine on Tuesdays or
Wednesdays, in the middle of the night. Why those two days? Because by Monday, many
addicts have used up their supply. They wait until late at night to mix up a new batch
because, the later the hour, the less chance they'll get caught.
The report was one of two studies recently conducted by the Inland
Narcotics Clearing House, a branch of the Office of National Drug Policy Control that is
made up of a consortium of local and federal law enforcement agencies. The findings
provide a stark, often disturbing profile of methamphetamine users and suppliers in
Riverside and San Bernardino counties, the region's hotspot for methamphetamine
manufacturing. The studies also tracked how quickly people across Southern California are
learning to manufacture the drug, and the way these "cooks" get around tough
restrictions on the over-the-counter ingredients used to make meth. Riverside County
sheriff's sergeant and clearinghouse spokesman Rod Crisp said the studies "help our
officers on the street understand the trends and what they're up against."
The first study, called the Hammer Report, provided an annual review of
meth lab seizures during 2002. The second report was based on a survey of 200 admitted
methamphetamine addicts at rehabilitation facilities throughout the two counties. A lack
of information regarding the local meth problem, authorities say, prompted the survey.
Law enforcement officials say the methamphetamine trade has two
distinct and vastly different sources: the stove-top cooks, who tend to be addicts
scrounging to feed their own habit; and "super labs," high-tech and well-funded
clandestine manufacturers run by Mexican drug-trafficking organizations. The latter can
produce millions in profits. Stove-top cooks make meth to use, not sell. And though they
only produce about 20% of the nation's meth, they are the most abundant, said Will Glasby,
spokesman for the Drug Enforcement Agency.
Local authorities say the surveys have given them a better idea of who
these stove-top cooks are: middle-aged, blue-collar white males living in suburban areas.
Contrary to popular belief, most stove-top cooks do not learn to make meth by searching
the Web or by reading a book. Nearly 60% of those surveyed said a friend or companion
showed them how.
The study estimates that between 1999 and 2001, more than 250,000
people in Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles and Orange counties learned to cook
methamphetamine also known as speed or crank. One of the study's most startling
revelations is how state and federal restrictions on the sale of methamphetamine's
ingredients, such as over-the-counter decongestants and a variety of industrial cleaning
solutions, have spawned a new breed of junkie known as the "dirt baron."
To overcome the challenge of getting what's needed, the report says,
some users have taken to combing isolated parts of the desert looking for leftovers dumped
in the dirt by large-scale meth lab cooks. Once such a location is discovered, dirt barons
dig up the soil, which often contains toxic byproducts produced in the meth-making
process. According to the report, they then "transport it home to extract any
residual meth that may be left in the dirt." Nearly 65% of those surveyed said they
know someone who has or have themselves gone to such extraordinary lengths to get high.
But the dirt barons, desperate for meth's long-lasting high, are still better off than
some, authorities say. There are others who use their own urine, Crisp said. These
"tinkle tweakers," as police call them, store their urine in bottles so they can
reprocess it to extract methamphetamine.
But stove-top lab seizures account for the majority of the nation's
meth busts. Close to 95% of the country's more than 7,000 lab seizures last year were
these mom-and-pop operations, Glasby said. "You have a huge number of these small
labs, but they're not producing large quantities," he said, adding that most
stove-top labs produce less than 10% of what a super lab turns out. "They're not
doing it to get rich. They're doing it to get high."
Unlike the stove-top cook, super labs crank out large quantities of
meth and distribute it across the country. Southern California's Inland Empire has more
super labs than most places, authorities say. Nearly 400 methamphetamine labs were
uncovered in the region last year, according to the Hammer Report. Twenty-two were
large-scale labs capable of manufacturing more than 17 tons of crystal meth a year with a
street value of $160 million. This is probably just a fraction of the labs in operation.
Authorities say that for every lab they find, there could be five more they don't detect.
Super lab cooks, authorities say, can make 10 pounds of methamphetamine or more a night, a
year's supply for a stove-top cook.
Many sophisticated labs, says the Hammer Report, are located along
freeways and railways that link Inland regions to the rest of the country. That way, it
says, the finished product can be shipped out easily and quickly. Most of the
methamphetamine seized around the country comes from this area, said Jose Martinez, a
spokesman in the DEA's Los Angeles division. "It's got the dubious honor of supplying
methamphetamine to the rest of the country," he said.
Schools Failing Disabled Kids, Advocates Say
Dean Schabner, ABC News- 5/14/2003
How does a boy, once a member of gifted programs, descend through a series of
disciplinary actions and suspensions, ultimately to be barred from school entirely by the
age of 14? His parents say it was because of his emerging learning disability, and rather
than deal with his problems, they say his school system, like many school systems across
the country, simply tossed him aside.
The boy, identified as K.S.G. to protect his identity, is one of eight
learning-disabled students who are part of a class-action lawsuit filed recently against
the New York City Department of Education. It's a case that education experts and
advocates for children with disabilities say is emblematic of a disturbing trend that is
becoming endemic across the country as schools grapple with funding cuts, understaffing
and increased pressure from the federal No Child Left Behind program to raise overall
performance levels. "New York City schools and districts regularly engage in a
practice of excluding disabled children from school and denying them educational services
to which they are entitled," alleges the suit filed by a group called Advocates for
Children in U.S. District Court in New York. A spokesman for the New York City Department
of Education declined to comment on the suit.
In K.S.G.'s case, the suit says, he began his schooling in a program
for gifted students, but when his performance started to slip and he developed
disciplinary problems, he was repeatedly suspended and transferred from school to school.
In just the past year, he missed more than 50 days of classes. Instead of having him
evaluated to try to find the reason for his problems as required by the federal
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA, as it's called his family
says school officials have tried to ban him from school altogether. His family says that
if his school had him evaluated, they would have recognized that he suffers from severe
brain trauma and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, as he has since been diagnosed
by the New York University Child Study Center, and could have provided him with the
program required by federal law. Instead, at 14 years old he is barred from school,
awaiting a hearing to try to get him back in.
"Disabled children miss weeks, months or years of school or they
are moved without due process to 'alternative' schools or suspension centers where they
are warehoused without legally adequate instruction," the Advocates for Children
complaint says. "These practices violate the principles underlying the federal laws
that were created to protect disabled children."
To Jail or the Streets
Advocates and researchers say the failure to provide educations for children with
disabilities does more than harm a few kids. They say it exacts a high toll on society at
large, even if removing some troubled students from class helps other children remain
undistracted and focused. There are more than 6.5 million students with disabilities in
the nation's schools, and about half of them have learning disabilities, according to Jim
Bradshaw of the U.S. Department of Education. He said that over the last decade the number
has been rising, but that the increase has been in line with the increase in overall
student population.
Researchers and advocates point to studies, including two finished
recently, that find higher percentages of children with learning disabilities in the
juvenile justice system than in the general population. They say that if schools were
doing what federal law requires in terms of providing individual attention, they would not
fall behind their peers and develop the frustration and anger that can lead kids to act up
and create problems.
Once kids with learning disabilities find themselves in the juvenile
justice system, there is little chance for them to get their education back on track and
get started out in life on the right foot, researchers and advocates say. "The
schools end up getting rid of kids, discarding them," said Dan Mears, a senior
research associate at the Washington, D.C.-based Urban Institute and co-author of the
study "Addressing the Needs of Youth with Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice
System: The Status of Evidence-Based Research." "Then there are two places they
can go: into the justice system or out on the streets," he said.
They Basically Unravel
According to Mears' study, children and youth with disabilities have become
increasingly overrepresented in the juvenile justice system as a direct result of
discipline problems caused by their disability. The National Center on Education,
Disability and Juvenile Justice has found the same thing, as have the Civil Rights Project
at Harvard University, Children and Adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder,
and Advocates for Children. "Once they can't read and can't do math at the level of
their classmates, when they do math and read at a second-grade level and they're 15 or 16,
they basically unravel," said Elisa Hyman, director of Advocates for Children.
An educator who runs the largest special education program in Vermont
said there are other factors that contribute to children acting up, but that frustration
with a lack of academic progress play a role. "I think it's reasonable to imagine
that if an adolescent has fallen behind, they'd get to a point where they might not buy
into the whole education thing as a positive thing for them," said Richard Smith,
director of special education at the Orleans Essex North Supervisory Union.
A Dead End?
Ira Hughes, a 20-year-old New York City man, is another case of what can go
wrong, but also of how it can be made right. He said he wanted to stay in school, but when
he realized he was going to be in 10th grade for a third time, it stopped making sense,
and he dropped out two years ago. Hughes has severe dyslexia that the school he was
attending seemed unable to deal with, he said. He had not had a teacher working with him
one-on-one since junior high school, which was when his disability was finally diagnosed,
and felt he had not made academic progress since then. "It was like a dead-end
thing," he said. "I felt like if it was three years, it could be four years or
five years. It wouldn't matter." So he dropped out, rather than beat his head against
a wall that wasn't moving. Hughes, who works as a security guard, is currently attending a
GED program where he works one-on-one with a teacher who is helping him overcome his
dyslexia, and he is on course to get his diploma. The classes are being paid for by the
New York City Department of Education, he said, "Kind of like, 'We owe you.' "
Hughes, some children's advocates would say, is lucky. Not just because
now he is getting the help at taxpayer expense that he didn't get in school.
But also because his frustration at not getting the kind of attention he felt he needed to
help him learn did not lead to disciplinary problems that could have landed him in the
courts, with little or no chance at an education.
A Complex Problem
While researchers believe they understand the price society pays for not
educating the learning-disabled, the causes of the problem are too complex for pointing
fingers in any one direction, Mears and other researchers say. Special-education students
are supposed to spend most of their time in a mainstream classroom, with short one-on-one
sessions with a specially trained teacher to deal with the student's particular problem,
educators who ABCNEWS spoke to said.
IDEA, enacted nearly three decades ago, requires that once students are diagnosed with a
learning disability, their school has to develop an individual education plan that can be
re-evaluated every year. Such programs are extremely expensive, though, and as school
districts are forced by funding cuts to reduce staff, regular classroom teachers can find
themselves forced to deal more and more with students they are not trained to handle, said
Dick Riley, spokesman for the United Federation of Teachers. That can take time away from
other kids. In some cases, inadequate funding means that schools do not have sufficient
facilities or personnel to implement the programs required by federal law, Mears said.
Wait and Fail
Sometimes the programs work perfectly, but another difficulty for teachers and
schools is simply recognizing when a child has a problem, which is why Smith said his
district has implemented a program to identify children who need special education
programs at an early age, trying to avoid the "wait and fail model," when
schools wait until children are already performing at a drastically lower level than where
their ability would indicate they should be.
"The reality is that by high school they may already be at a
crisis point where they're going to be really hard to change," he said. "We
think it's better to start when they're young, when we can make a positive change before
they get to that crisis point. Research shows that even by the end of first grade their
performance already has an impact on their opinion of themselves." However, many
teachers are not properly trained to recognize the warning signs of learning disabilities,
so a child may already have fallen far behind others in the same age group, Mears said.
There is also federal pressure. The mandatory testing used to measure a
school's progress under No Child Left Behind can create pressure on administrators to get
rid of children who are disciplinary problems, no matter why the child is acting up, and
zero-tolerance policies give teachers and administrators no room for leniency if there are
extenuating circumstances, said Peter Leone, a University of Maryland professor in the
Department of Special Education and the director of the National Center on Education,
Disability and Juvenile Justice. "If you run a school and you are told you're going
to be judged on how kids do on these standardized tests, you're going to want your school
to do as well as possible," Leone said. "There's no incentive in too many cases
to keep the learning-disabled kids in schools."
Let Teachers Teach
Of particular concern to groups like the Maryland-based Children and Adults with
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, or CHADD, are proposed federal laws that they
fear would inhibit teachers who suspect that a child might have a learning disability from
suggesting to parents that they have the youngster evaluated. One is the Child Medication
Safety Act of 2003, which would bar school officials from requiring learning-disabled
children to get medication as a condition for being allowed in school. "As a
condition of receiving funds under any program or activity administered by the Secretary
of Education, each State shall develop and implement policies and procedures prohibiting
school personnel from requiring a child to obtain a prescription for a controlled
substance in schedule II under section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act as a
condition of attending school or receiving services," the House bill, HR 1170, says
in part.
They fear that the potential for schools to lose federal funding will
lead instructors to avoid the issue of learning disabilities altogether. "It's really
absurd, because if a teacher is not the person who can raise those concerns, if a teacher
is not the person with the mandate to raise concerns about a student's learning, who is?
They're the experts, aren't they?" said one teacher with 15 years experience in
special education who asked not to be identified. "That said, I'm horrified when I
hear teachers say 'That kid needs to be medicated,' though I've seen so many kids with
attention deficit who do so much better when they get the medication they need," the
teacher said. "I've seen so many kids who want to be good students and are bright
kids but can't screw themselves down to the chair without medication."
Another concern is a proposed revision of IDEA, called the Improving
Education Results for Children with Disabilities Act of 2003. The measure would revise the
requirement that a student who has been diagnosed with a learning disability be
re-evaluated every year to requiring new evaluations only every three years, among other
provisions such as making it easier to remove learning-disabled students in some
circumstances.
Proponents of the measures say they would give parents greater control,
and allow teachers to focus better on the classroom. According to a statement released by
Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, the chairman of the House Committee on Education and the
Workforce, regarding the IDEA revision, HR1350, is that the changes will lead to
"reducing the number of students who are misidentified or overrepresented in special
education" and allow teachers "to teach, not fill out paperwork."
A Success Story
Advocates fear that if it becomes harder under law to deal with children in
special education, more will fall through the cracks. Evelyn Green, an administrator with
the Chicago public schools' Office of Early Childhood Development and the president of
CHADD, said she has seen such "discarded" children among the gangs on the
streets of Chicago. "What's really clear is that some of these kids, particularly the
leaders, are really bright, but a lot of them are angry and frustrated," Green said.
"It's evident having a conversation with them that they are very bright, but maybe
they can't read because they're dyslexic. The frustration with their learning disability
leads to them acting out, taking it out on society."
She said her own son could have gone that way, because of his attention
deficit disorder. "I think about the number of times that he got in trouble directly
as a result of his AD/HD," she said. "If he hadn't had the protections in place,
I hate to think where he might be. He's graduating with honors with a college scholarship.
I know that wouldn't have happened without a positive behavior plan."
Kids at Risk
Mears' study, based on examination of data from numerous sources, including
individual districts as well as from city- and statewide studies, found that children who
have been diagnosed with learning disabilities make up roughly 20 percent of the
population in the juvenile justice system, while they are just 10 percent of the overall
population.
The National Center on Education, Disability and Juvenile Justice
solicited information from departments of education, juvenile courts and detention centers
and, from the responses, estimated that at least 34 percent of the children in the
juvenile justice system had been enrolled in special education at some point in their
school. "Actually, we think that's low," said Leone, the NCEDJJ director.
"A handful of states said that more than half the kids in long-term juvenile
detention had been enrolled in special education. We don't think that's an
aberration."
The disparity in the numbers may be due in part to inaccuracies in
record keeping, or failure of the youngster's family or school to report on the child's
education history. "I think it's a problem that we're becoming more and more aware
of," Leone said. "I think there's a growing awareness in a larger
community."
Drug Study Promising for Heavy Drinkers
Shankar Vedantam, Washington Post- 5/15/2003
A drug with a novel mechanism of action reduced the craving for alcohol
among heavy drinkers and may help alcoholics quit or seriously reduce their drinking,
researchers reported yesterday. The medicine, topiramate, which is marketed to control
seizures, was found to be effective in a trial with 150 volunteers conducted at the
University of Texas at San Antonio, said lead investigator Bankole Johnson, a
psychiatrist. "We think it's very significant," he said in an interview. In a
comparison of those taking the drug with those receiving placebo pills and behavioral
counseling, the drug "is four times better in terms of heavy drinking and eight times
better in terms of complete abstinence."
The Food and Drug Administration has not approved the medicine, which
appears to affect the brain's ability to experience the pleasure of drinking and to reduce
the craving for alcohol, for treating alcoholism. The study would have to be replicated in
larger groups before doctors could recommend it. Still, federal researchers and others
agreed that it could open a new front in the treatment of alcohol abuse, which afflicts
about 14 million Americans -- one in every 13 adults. Alcohol abusers are defined as men
who have five or more drinks per day and women who have four or more drinks each day.
Unlike traditional alcohol abuse studies, which usually examine the
effectiveness of medicines and psychological interventions in keeping alcoholics from
drinking at all, Johnson's study involved volunteers who were active heavy drinkers. The
results were published in the Lancet medical journal. "The results were very
promising," said Raye Litten, chief of the Treatment Research Branch at the National
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Large studies are underway to measure the
effects of combining other medications with a range of psychosocial therapies. Topiramate
may be especially effective in easing the symptoms of withdrawal, said Robert Swift, an
alcohol abuse researcher at Brown University.
Doctors believe that most alcoholics require treatment with multiple
approaches, including other medicines and psychological or religious techniques, to quit
drinking and stay sober. Since many alcoholics go back to the bottle, doctors have come to
mark victory against alcohol abuse in modest terms -- keeping people sober for periods of
time rather than expecting them to quit permanently. "Alcoholism is not a homogenous
disease, so there is no magic bullet out there to treat" it, Litten said. "There
is a biological component and a psychological component and a cultural component and a
social component, and they vary from individual to individual."
Two medicines are approved to treat alcohol abuse -- disulfiram, sold
under the trade name Antabuse, makes drinkers feel sick if they drink, while the better
known naltrexone, sold as ReVia or Depade, appears to reduce the pleasure in drinking,
Swift said.
Johnson pointed out that all the patients taking topiramate in his
study -- even those still drinking -- were no longer consuming dangerous amounts of
alcohol. "We are able to get practically everybody drinking close to nothing, and the
ones who are still drinking are not drinking as much," he said. The study measured
the effectiveness of topiramate -- which is sold under the brand name Topamax -- among 150
heavy drinkers. Half received the medicine and low-intensity counseling, while the other
half received placebo pills and the same counseling. The average person in the topiramate
group was drinking 9.59 drinks a day upon beginning the study, compared with 8.85 drinks a
day in the placebo group. Participants were asked to keep track of how much they drank,
and even before they began taking medication their consumption dropped dramatically -- an
indication of the role social factors play in alcohol abuse. By the end of the three-month
trial, patients taking topiramate were down to 1.5 drinks a day, while those taking the
placebo were down to 3.36 drinks a day. Johnson said 13 or 14 patients in the topiramate
group quit entirely and stayed sober, while only two from the placebo group stopped
drinking altogether.
Topiramate is sold in the United States by Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical
of Raritan, N.J., which provided the pills and some funding. Most of the funding came from
Johnson's own department. The researcher said he owns no stock in the company and would
not financially benefit if the FDA approved the medicine for treating alcohol abuse.
Stephanie Scott, a spokeswoman for the company, said, "Right now, all we can say is
the results are promising and would warrant some future investigation. We are not actively
pursuing an indication for alcoholism for this compound."
Johnson's study did not report any severe side effects, but a recent study of
topiramate in epileptics, conducted by Kimford J. Meador, chairman of the Neurology
Department at Georgetown University Medical Center, found that some experienced severe
side effects unless they started at low doses and built up gradually.
A Smoother Life for People Who Stutter
Martin Miller, Los Angeles Times- 5/15/2003
Ordering dinner may not sound like much of a triumph, but it is when you stutter like
Kevin Murphy. For most of his life, the 19-year-old college student had avoided public
speaking and talking to strangers. The embarrassment caused by the few excruciating
seconds of stammering over a syllable, word or phrase was simply too much to bear. Because
of it, Murphy's parents always had ordered his meals when eating out. But on this
particular night a couple of years ago at a hometown restaurant, Murphy, still in high
school at the time, surprised his father by ordering dinners for the two of them. He marks
this moment, shortly after an intensive month-long speech program, as a beginning. "I
told my dad I wanted to make up for all those times he had ordered for me," said
Murphy, now a business student at Idaho State University.
Stuttering is a communication disorder, with speech disruptions that
typically strike at the beginning of a word or sentence. The condition can range from mild
(a syllable or word is occasionally repeated) to severe (a five-word sentence can take a
minute or longer). About 1% of the population suffers from the condition in some form,
with adult male stutterers outnumbering their female counterparts by a ratio of 4 to 1,
according to the National Stuttering Association.
The disorder is as old as spoken language, researchers say. Depicted in
Egyptian hieroglyphics and written about by Hippocrates, its long history has fueled many
misconceptions, some of which still exist. Among the most damaging is that stuttering's
roots are psychological and can be blamed upon stupidity, nervousness or a mental illness.
Instead, researchers believe stuttering has multiple causes, probably involving brain
chemistry, genetics and environmental factors. Anxiety and tension can compound the
problem, quickly creating a vicious cycle that destroys the ability to speak.
Non-stutterers can unwittingly contribute to the dynamic by either finishing sentences or
offering up unsolicited advice like: "Relax" or "Slow down."
"There's no cure," said J. Scott Yaruss, a National Stuttering Association board
member and co-director of the Stuttering Center of Western Pennsylvania. "But every
person who stutters can learn to speak more effectively, more smoothly and with less
effort. There really should be nothing a stutterer can't do."
Murphy was about 3 years old when his parents noticed his talking
troubles or, as researchers call them, speech "dysfluencies." But as is
frequently the case, pediatricians weren't overly concerned. After all, an estimated 5% of
children experience some developmental stuttering between the ages of 2 and 6. In more
than three-quarters of these cases, the children outgrow it. "It's totally normal for
a child to go through a period where they stutter," said Yaruss, an associate
professor of communication science and disorders at the University of Pittsburgh. But, he
added, if parents are worried or, more important, the child seems to be, an appointment
with a speech therapist is recommended. If a child enters a speech therapy program before
the age of 7, the condition can often be eliminated, Yaruss said. "Families are often
told to wait and see if their child's stutter goes away," he said. "But this is
too big a risk for the child, because if we wait too long, the opportunity for a complete
full recovery can be lost."
Murphy, however, saw about a dozen doctors and speech therapists over
more than a decade. Often the therapies included avoiding certain words or sounds that
might trigger stuttering or altering the speed of their speech. Like many stutterers,
Murphy found these strategies usually worked only temporarily. And, despite all his
treatments, he was still considered a severe stutterer, leading him to shy away from
speaking in class and to avoid friendships with non-stutterers. "When you're going to
school whether it's elementary or high school you never want to be the
different one in the crowd," said Murphy. "I never really had a problem with
teasing, but it was still pretty tough at times."
Drug therapies were and still are available, but Murphy opted against
them. The drugs have been shown to improve the condition in only about half the cases.
Also, the powerful medications, similar to the ones used to treat schizophrenia and
depression, can have serious side effects.
Three years ago, Murphy joined the National Stuttering Association, and
a couple of speech pathologists in the group suggested he try a new intensive speech
therapy program at Eastern Washington University in Cheney. Unlike many traditional
programs that emphasize conquering the condition or modifying speech to become more
socially acceptable, this one urged stutterers to embrace and accept their condition. The
month-long program, called the Successful Stuttering Management Program, costs about
$1,500. In individual and classroom sessions, students are instructed to deal with their
difficulty without shame and to stop avoiding words that can exacerbate stuttering. (Some
people, for instance, might stumble over "V" sounds and thus avoid using words
that begin with "V.") The goal is to help stutterers communicate more
effectively, not to stamp out stuttering. "It's really one of the few programs in the
country that takes such a broad-case approach," said Yaruss. "The key is it
doesn't focus on just creating fluency, but overcoming fears and feeling better about the
fact you stutter. It's hard work, much harder than learning a small trick."
Murphy found the program's off-campus instruction to be most helpful
for his everyday life. In these scenarios, students are pushed into what they consider to
be the most challenging speaking situations: conducting on-the-street surveys and phone
calls to strangers. "At first listeners didn't know what was going on, whether I was
doing a survey or making a phone call," said Murphy. "But as soon as the people
realized that it just takes me a bit longer for me to get my message across, things would
improve." "I would usually say, 'I stutter so it takes me a little longer,"
added Murphy. "That helped out because I would be more at ease, and then I'd know the
listener was more at ease too."
After the program, Murphy stopped turning away from potentially
stressful speaking situations such as asking for directions from strangers. He recently
addressed a group of 500 people at last year's NSA convention in Anaheim. The confidence
he has gained has also made it easier to forge friendships with non-stutterers. The
efforts had their ups and downs, but through practice, his speech has steadily improved.
"I wasn't the same stutterer I was when I came out of the program," he said.
"I was significantly better, but again it's not something you can fix in a month. You
need to work on it every day -- and I do."
Grief Over Spouse's Death Can Give Way to a New Sense of
Fulfillment
Benedict Carey, Los Angeles Times- 5/15/2003
Some people follow their spouses right through to the next world, dying mere hours or
days after their beloved. It is sometimes suggested that the cause of death was a broken
heart. But while many people view widowhood as the start of a prolonged period of grieving
and suffering, socials scientists are finding that, more often than not, just the opposite
is true. Men and women who lose a spouse not only survive the loss but usually resume
satisfying lives, researchers find. "You do feel like you're dying yourself, at
first," said Helen Kane, 83, of Downey, who lost her husband, Austin, four years ago
to cancer. "It kind of comes as a surprise when you don't."
In studies during the last few years, researchers have found that many
widows and widowers show no signs of mental anguish or need for counseling. Some recently
widowed men and women actually report being more satisfied with their lives than
peers whose spouses are alive. And now social scientists are beginning to understand
exactly how so many of them discover a renewed sense of self-assurance, after losing their
spouses. "We focused for so long on the negatives of widowhood that we weren't able
to acknowledge that there might be something good to say about it," said Deborah
Carr, a sociologist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J., who presented the new
research on life satisfaction at a recent aging conference. "It is amazing to me that
in some cases married women reported lower satisfaction with their lives than those who'd
lost a spouse just six months before," Carr said.
The new findings on widowhood spring from an analysis of in-depth
interviews with 1,532 Detroit-area seniors conducted in the 1980s and 1990s, as part of a
University of Michigan project called Changing Lives of Older Couples, or CLOC. During the
investigation, 319 of the participants were widowed. For the first time, researchers had
enough information to compare people's lives before and after a spouse's death, rather
than relying on memories. Analyzing the interviews and surveys, they find that personality
traits and marital relations can help predict one's experience of widowhood, and provide
clues to how people manage its aftermath of loss and uncertainty.
For even when it's long expected, after all, the death of a spouse is
an emotional earthquake that psychologists rate as one of life's most distressing events.
Kane said she was "in real, physical, aching pain for about a year" after her
husband died. When Jim Shoop's wife died seven years ago, his days became "all
blackness." As you grow older, said the 80-year-old Downey resident, "you find
that your spouse is much closer to you than ever before, when both of you were working and
raising kids. You're always together with this person, and then one day they're
gone."
About a quarter of the Michigan widows and widowers reported serious
depression after their spouses died. But George Bonanno, a psychologist at Columbia
University in New York who studies grief and recovery, recently compared the interview
responses more closely and found that nearly half of these people were depressed before
their spouses died. "Losing a spouse undoubtedly exacerbates the depression in
many cases," Bonanno said, "but it didn't cause it in these people."
Among those who did experience depression just after being widowed,
Bonanno found high levels of a specific personality trait: an anxious neediness. In
surveys taken before their spouses died, these husbands and wives tended to agree with
statements such as, "I imagine the worst if a loved one doesn't arrive on time,"
and "People sometimes don't realize how easily they can hurt me." While such
people are in the minority, they tend to be highly sensitive to being betrayed and have a
preoccupation or fear of being abandoned, Bonanno said, adding that these people often
require counseling.
By far the most common experience of grieving is what psychologists
call the resilient pattern, an acceptance of death that gives way to recovery of energy
and interest in beginning a new life. Sometimes this process can drag on for a year or
more, complicated by squabbles over an estate, or lack thereof. But most often it happens
within the first year after the death.
After her husband of 34 years, Judah, died of a viral infection last
September, Alice Graubart, 57, a Chicago social worker, had nightmares almost every night.
"I was reliving the circumstances of his death a lot the hospital scenes, the
way he looked. It was awful," she said. After three months, however, the anguish
finally broke, the nightmares faded and a sense of normality returned. "It's a new
normal," she said. "He's not here, but I feel like myself again."
One reason older adults recover more quickly is they've had more life
experience, psychiatrists say. By age 60, most have had at least one parent, friend or
family member die; they've had scares about high blood pressure, high cholesterol, polyps
or cysts and lived through the midlife reckoning with their own mortality. "After a
certain age, widowhood is not unexpected, it's almost a developmental milestone of late
life, neither surprising nor abnormal," said Dr. Gary Kennedy, past president of the
American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. "This is not to say that it can't be
devastating. But provided the person had a good marriage, there's a lot to be built
upon."
Yet it's doing for oneself that helps people climb out of their misery,
according to Carr, the Rutgers sociologist. In a new study of dependence and widowhood
based on the Michigan data, Carr found that men who relied on their wives for tasks such
as cooking, laundry and housework tend to report high levels of satisfaction when widowed.
Some widowers find another woman to help look after them; but others find surprising
pleasure in the small chores of daily living once done by their spouses. After coming to
terms with the death of his wife, Claire, 14 years ago, Wilbur Yonan, 78, of Long Beach,
discovered grocery shopping. "It's something I like to do now. I get a charge out of
it, though I'm not sure most widowed men feel that way," said Yonan, who's now
remarried.
Women who relied on their husbands for emotional support likewise
reported high levels of life satisfaction in widowhood, the research suggests. Many of
these women were in stifling relationships to start with, explains Carr, and probably were
lacking in self-confidence while married. After losing a spouse, they find strength in
simply living and providing for themselves, something they'd thought unimaginable before.
But there's more to the adjustment than simply escaping the
manipulations of a demanding spouse. In almost any long marriage, Carr argues, there are
parts of our personality that are put on hold or fall into the background of the
relationship. "At some level in a long marriage, people forget about an aspect of
themselves, something that wasn't fostered by their partner," she said. "In a
sense you can lose some private part of yourself in a marriage that can now be
rediscovered when you're alone. Sometimes you need a shock to make you see those things,
and make a real change in your life."
Helen Kane rarely had to visit the post office, bank or cleaners
because her husband took care of those chores during their marriage. "I would think
nothing of saying, 'Oh, stop and get stamps', or, 'Go ahead and drop this off at the
bank,' and that was that," she said. "I really never made those trips
myself." Since he died, she has little choice.
A hospice volunteer who also counsels other widows, Kane said one of
the first tests of a newly widowed person's emotional resilience comes in April tax
month. "For people who never had to worry about the finances, it's a very big deal to
get that done, because you can't concentrate very well after this person has left you, and
it's very hard to close out a year when you've got a death in it."
Over time, the oddest thing for many widows and widowers may be that
the initial shock and grief soften, the waves of sadness no longer crash on every
anniversary, and what was once such a painful and persistent event drops gradually into
the past. It's as if the emotional chemistry has altered, which, psychologists now say, is
normal. For many years, said Columbia University's Bonanno, the common belief among mental
health experts was that people who didn't continually grieve after the death of a spouse
were unfeeling or in denial about unresolved issues. "But now we can say that this is
the how human-beings handle the loss of the most important person in their lives," he
said. "They grieve and move on."
Parent of 12-Year-Old Suicide Lobby for Insurance Law
Michael Hill, Associated Press- 5/17/2003
ROTTERDAM, N.Y. -- Timothy O'Clair's short, troubled life was marked by depression,
sudden rages and finally, the 12-year-old hanging himself in his closet. Tom and Donna
O'Clair tried to treat their youngest son's mental illness as best they could. But they
repeatedly bumped up against limits in their insurance coverage. Psychiatric visits were
parceled out. Timothy's institutional stays could be frustratingly brief. Getting enough
help for Timothy could be a struggle.
In a sense, the O'Clairs are still fighting for Timothy two years after
his death. Tom and Donna are lobbyists for expanded mental health coverage. Between
parenting and their day jobs Tom is a mechanic, Donna a nurse's aide they shoehorn in
talks to lawmakers, TV cameras and public audiences. Churning up painful memories of their
lost boy is worth it, they decided, if they can help secure passage in New York of
''Timothy's Law.'' ''This is all therapy for us,'' Tom explained. ''I mean, we're dealing
with Timothy's loss daily anyway. To deal with his loss and to feel his loss and not do
anything about it is beyond me.''
Timothy was born in 1988 and raised in brick home with a big grassy
yard near Schenectady in upstate New York. The third of three boys, his parents describe a
boy who fished, chipped golf balls and skinned his knees. Pictures in Timothy's memory
album show a rail-thin boy with dark hair getting on the school bus, smiling on the beach,
mugging for the camera and then, jarringly, lying in his coffin with a crown of daisies.
Timothy's slide from typical to troubled started becoming apparent in
third grade. He would become easily frustrated and quick to anger. The episodes were like
dark clouds in a sunny sky. A look or a laugh could set him off. He kicked his mother's
shins black and blue, threw rags in the furnace and threatened to kill himself. Once, he
scrambled up a tree with a rope around his neck. Why are you so mad, his parents would ask
him. I don't know, he would say. ''He has these feelings and sometimes he can't
describe them,'' Tom said. ''He can't tell us where they come from. He just has them.''
The O'Clairs sought psychiatric help early on. Therapy. Medication.
Institutional stays. Timothy was eventually diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder, depression and oppositional defiance disorder. The O'Clairs say Timothy received
good care; the problem was getting enough of it. The family's insurance plan through Tom's
employer, the Thruway Authority, limited mental health coverage to 20 days outpatient care
and 30 days inpatient, common in New York state. Tom said they had to spread out Timothy's
treatment so he wouldn't use up his 20 visits in three months ''and then Boom! nothing for
the rest of the year.'' Copays for repeat care ratcheted up from $10 to $35. Coupled with
the cost of uncovered care, the family's money was getting sucked up. As Timothy's
condition worsened, the family could not afford the care they thought he needed.
The answer was a bitter pill they avoided as long as possible. They
arranged for full insurance coverage, but it meant placing Timothy in foster care so he
would be eligible for Medicaid. ''That was the hardest thing I had to do,'' Donna said.
''I fought with that idea.'' Foster care could be a bumpy ride but a break came in the
summer of 2000. Timothy improved markedly over seven months at the Northeast Parent Child
Society.
Timothy came home Jan. 30, 2001. He killed himself six weeks later. The
final decline was so rapid it caught the O'Clairs by surprise. Tom was working his second
job that night. Donna was grocery shopping with their middle son. Timothy was home with
his oldest brother. Timothy smashed his little league trophies in one final rage, tied a
bathrobe sash around his neck and hanged himself in his closet. It was his ''safe place,''
Tom said.
The O'Clairs transitioned from private grief to public lobbying about
18 months later. Tom did volunteer work at Samaritans Suicide Prevention Center, which led
to a proposition from mental health advocates: Would the O'Clairs lend Timothy's name to a
bill before the state Legislature? The bill would mandate mental health services be
covered at the same level as physical ailments such as cancer or diabetes.
The benefit to mental health advocates is clear. J. David Seay of the
state chapter of the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill notes that lending a child's
name to a bill personalizes policy issues in a way reasoned speeches cannot. Bill naming
became popular after Megan's Law in the '90s and continues today. The national Amber Alert
for abducted children signed into law this year, for instance, was named for a slain Texas
girl.
The O'Clairs get something out of it too. Lobbying for Timothy's Law is
a way to face their pain head on. They believe Timothy could have been helped by the law,
and now others could be helped in his memory. As they spend spare hours spreading
Timothy's story, Donna pins a button with a picture of Timothy to her blouse. Tom has his
son's smiling face tattooed on his burly upper arm. ''Everyone has his 15 minutes of
fame,'' Tom said, ''and Timothy is not going to miss out on his.''
Tom does most of the talking during interviews, reciting talking points
from memory. Equitable insurance would cost premium holders only $1.26 extra a month, he
says, and 81 percent of New Yorkers polled favor it. Legislative support is harder to
gauge. The Democratic-led Assembly approved a similar bill last year, but a bill has yet
to be introduced in the Republican-run state Senate. The insurance industry has opposed
the expanded coverage. Leslie Moran of the New York Health Plan Association said the group
fears Timothy's Law would add close to $210 million annually in new costs to the system,
potentially increasing the number of uninsured.
Mental health advocates believe the O'Clair's story and their energy is
bringing the bill closer to passage. In a two-day tour of upstate cities this month, the
pair crunched in visits to Binghamton, Syracuse and Rochester in a single day the day
Timothy would have turned 15. ''It's like we're still giving him a gift on his birthday,''
Tom said.
On the Net: http://www.timothyslaw.org
|