Noteworthy News Articles on Mental Health Topics, December
1-7, 2004
40 Percent in U.S. Use Prescription Drugs
Associated Press, 12/2/2004
WASHINGTON -- More than 40 percent of Americans take at least one
prescription drug and one-in-six takes at least three, the government
reported Thursday. ``Americans are taking medicines that lower cholesterol
and reduce the threat of heart disease, that help lift people out
of debilitating depressions, and that keep diabetes in check,'' Health
and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson said in a statement.
The annual report on Americans' health
found that just over 44 percent of all Americans take at least one
prescription drug, and 16.5 percent take at least three. Those rates
were up from 39 percent and 12 percent between 1988 and 1994, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported. The report, ``Health,
United States 2004,'' presents the latest data collected by CBC, the
National Center for Health Statistics and dozens of other Federal
health agencies, academic and professional health associations, and
international health organizations.
Americans' life expectancy increased
to 77.3 years in 2002, a record. And deaths from heart disease, cancer
and stroke -- the nation's three leading killers -- are all down 1
percent to 3 percent, the analysis said. The study also found that
spending on health climbed 9.3 percent in 2002 to $1.6 trillion.
Prescription drugs, which make up about
one-tenth of the total medical bill, were the fastest growing expenditure.
The price of drugs rose 5 percent, but wider use of medicines pushed
total expenditures up 15.3 percent in 2002. Drug expenditures have
risen at least 15 percent every year since 1998. The report said prescription
drug use was increasing among people of all ages, and use increases
with age. Nearly half of all women were taking prescription drugs
-- 49 percent -- compared to 39 percent of men. Usage peaked at 84
percent for people aged 65 and over, with the top rate at 89 percent
for black women over 65. Even for people under age 18, however, nearly
one-fourth -- 24.1 percent -- were taking at least one prescription
medication. The rate rose to 34.7 percent between age 18 and 44; for
those ages 45 to 64, it was 62.1 percent.
Spending Urged for Anti - Smoking Programs
Associated Press, 12/2/2004
WASHINGTON -- Only three states -- Maine, Delaware and Mississippi
-- are spending money on anti-smoking efforts at the minimum levels
recommended by federal health officials, a coalition of public health
groups said Thursday. Altogether, the states have set aside $538 million
for smoking prevention for fiscal 2005, which began in October and
runs through September. That is just a third of the $1.6 billion minimum
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say should be spent
nationwide, says the report. The CDC's minimum funding recommendations
for each state are based on population and other factors.
The states are expected to receive an
estimated $7.1 billion this year from the tobacco industry through
legal settlements they reached with cigarette makers in the late 1990s,
according to the report released by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free
Kids, American Heart Association, American Cancer Society and American
Lung Association. The settlements were meant to help the states recoup
the cost of treating sick smokers, and the states pledged to fund
tobacco prevention programs.
Meanwhile, states in recent years have
been raising cigarette taxes, and they are slated to get nearly $13
billion in tobacco tax revenues this year, the report says. ``The
states are receiving more and more revenue related to tobacco but
doing far too little to fund programs to reduce tobacco use, particularly
among children,'' said Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for
Tobacco-Free Kids. ``They're using the money to fill short-term budget
shortfalls, build roads and every other conceivable political purpose.''
States that have allocated no significant
funding for tobacco prevention are: Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire,
South Carolina and Tennessee, the report said. The District of Columbia
also has not set aside money for that purpose, the report stated.
On the Net:
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids: http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/
CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/
Gov't Targets Drugged Driving Among Teens
Associated Press, 12/2/2004
WASHINGTON -- Many teen drivers believe it's less dangerous to drive
after smoking marijuana than after drinking alcohol, a perception
the government wants to change. ``Driving sober means no alcohol,
no marijuana, no drugs,'' John Walters, the Bush administration's
drug policy director, said Thursday as he showed a new television
ad aimed at stopping teens from driving after smoking pot.
Walters' office is spending $10 million on the ad and other efforts
to teach teens and their parents about the danger of drugged driving.
There also are brochures that are being distributed in high schools
and state motor vehicle offices.
Marijuana can affect concentration,
perception and reaction time up to 24 hours after it's smoked, Walters
said. Yet teens have gotten the message that it's a benign drug. In
a recent study, 30 percent of teens said ``planning to drive'' was
a reason not to drink. But only 18 percent cited ``planning to drive''
as a reason not to take drugs. The survey questioned 3,574 middle
and high school students nationwide in spring and was conducted for
Students Against Destructive Decisions and Liberty Mutual Insurance.
A 2004 study of patients admitted to the trauma unit at the University
of Maryland found that 19 percent of crash victims under 18 tested
positive for marijuana.
Allison Whitney, 25, a drug counselor
and recovering addict from Atlanta, said she got into several accidents
as a teenager because she was smoking pot while driving. Sometimes
she would get pulled over for swerving but police would let her go
when she didn't test positive for alcohol. Whitney said part of the
allure of marijuana for teens is that it's easy to hide. ``You can
get high in less time than you can get drunk, and your parents won't
detect it,'' she said.
Dr. Jeffrey Runge, the head of the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said states are training
police to recognize the effects of various drugs, but said more training
is needed. Runge also encouraged states to test drivers for drugs
after a crash so officials can understand the scope of drugged driving.
Now, drivers rarely are tested for drug use, Runge said. One-quarter
of the 3,657 drivers age 15 to 20 who were killed in accidents in
2003 had a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher.
Runge said teens are at special risk
because they are inexperienced drivers and they often have a dangerous
combination of alcohol and drugs in their systems. He said teens must
understand the dangers and designate a driver before they go out.
``Every driver has a personal responsibility not to get behind the
wheel while impaired,'' Runge said. ``A designated driver does not
mean the least drunk or stoned person at a party.'' In the television
ad, which will run through the end of the year, a young female driver
keeps having visions of an older man after she hits him in a crosswalk.
``You'll never forget the people you hurt when you were high,'' the
narrator says.
On the Net:
White House Office of National Drug Control Policy: http://www.freevibe.com
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov
Accused Mother Described As Gentle Soul
Associated Press, 12/2/2004
DALLAS -- The woman who severed her baby's arms is described by her
stepfather as a gentle soul who could have done such a thing only
in the grips of mental illness. Dena Schlosser, 35, of Plano faces
a capital murder charge for the death of 10-month-old Margaret, whose
body was found in her crib in a bedroom. Schlosser called 911 and
told an operator what she had done. She was in her apartment when
police arrived, still holding a knife and listening to a church hymn.
``If you'd taken a hundred acquaintances
at random and said to me, 'who would be the least likely to do anything
involving violence?' I would have put Dena at the head of that list,''
her stepfather, Mick Macaulay, said Wednesday in a telephone interview
from Canada, where he and Schlosser's mother live. ``This is a woman
who takes birds' wings, if they're broken, and splints them and nurses
them back to health,'' he said. ``Just a very gentle person.''
Macaulay, who is a mental health counselor,
has no doubt that Schlosser's behavior was brought on by what he termed
``postpartum psychosis.'' Generally speaking, according to a Web site
sponsored by federal health agencies, a psychotic loses touch with
reality, typically having delusions and/or hallucinations. ``It's
the only explanation that makes sense,'' Macaulay said.
Defense attorney David Haynes is looking
into whether Schlosser's mental state could have been affected by
several surgeries she had in childhood to drain fluid from her brain.
Haynes has said his client, who has a history of postpartum depression,
is disoriented and incompetent to stand trial. She remains in jail,
pending a bond hearing Monday. Macaulay said the surgeries left Schlosser
dependent on her mother and unable to do several things at a time.
He said she was also stressed at the time of the killing, trying to
cope with the baby, her mother's suffering from Parkinson's Disease
and financial problems brought on by her husband's layoff.
Schlosser was accused of child neglect
earlier this year, but a state investigation found she did not pose
a risk to the baby or her other two daughters. A judge granted temporary
custody of the girls, ages 6 and 9, to Texas Child Protective Services
after the agency determined their father, John Schlosser, had failed
to protect them from their mother. Macaulay said family members are
considering whether to seek custody of the girls. John Schlosser did
not return e-mail or telephone messages seeking comment.
Anti-Psychotics Treat Kids' Illnesses But Pose Other Risks
Ofelia Casillas, Chicago Tribune- 12/2/2004
The same drug that helped Rachel Mason graduate from 8th grade by
controlling her bipolar disorder caused her to weigh more than most
girls at the ceremony. The drug that eased Rachel's rages also sparked
insatiable hunger. By the time she slipped into a white-flowered red
skirt for graduation, the teen who stands only a few inches taller
than 5 feet weighed 243 pounds. "It's in my head," said
Rachel, 14, a high school freshman in Mt. Pulaski, Ill. "In my
stomach, I usually don't want to eat anything."
Apprehensive about severe side effects
associated with the first generation of drugs approved to treat psychosis--including
tremors, muscle contractions and involuntary movements that can cause
disfigurement--doctors have embraced a new group of drugs during the
last decade, among them Risperdal and Zyprexa.
As time passes, however, adverse effects
also have emerged for these new drugs--including a ravenous hunger
that leads to obesity in children and makes them susceptible to diabetes.
The dramatic weight gain can be emotionally difficult for teens at
a time when social pressures are especially intense. Doctors said
the weight gain can be hardest on girls who in many cases already
struggle with body image. Some refuse to take a drug that causes weight
gain even when it works.
Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
has approved these second-generation anti-psychotic drugs to treat
mentally ill adults, the agency has not agreed to their use in youths.
Doctors prescribe the drugs based on clinical trials, experience and
limited data.
Serious side effects
Some of these newer drugs have other side effects as well--one
drug causes a decrease in white blood cells, for example; others cause
tremors, sedation and low blood pressure. This year the FDA added
a warning label about increased diabetes risk to the anti-psychotic
drugs, which doctors find also are connected with increased cholesterol
and triglyceride levels.
Estimates of how many children are
taking these drugs are hard to come by, but a study of nearly 1 million
youngsters published last year showed the percentage treated with
anti-psychotic drugs doubled in a managed-care population and tripled
in the Medicaid population from 1987 to 1996. "It's a huge problem.
All of these medications right now are double-edged swords,"
said Dr. Michael Naylor, University of Illinois at Chicago director
of child psychiatry. "You're kind of left with a dilemma: Do
I choose a medication that can harm me or an illness that can harm
me? It's a terrible choice."
Rachel's parents, Stephen and Michelle
Mason, knew early on that something was wrong. In 2nd grade, Rachel
would crawl under her desk at school. She would yell and scream, chew
on erasers and eat paper. Other children were afraid. After her rages,
Rachel never remembered what happened. Rachel saw four psychiatrists
in six months and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder at age 8. She
took different medications, but none worked as well as the Zyprexa
she started in 6th grade.
While Rachel had always been
at the higher end of the weight scale compared with her peers, her
weight soon ballooned out of control. She never felt full. Rachel
could eat macaroni and cheese after school, a full dinner and still
snack later. In June she weighed 253 pounds. "She'd eat and eat
and eat," her mother said. "It was an all-of-the-time thing.
She'd get home and it was like `I need this, I need that' and she'd
shovel it in."
Dr. Christoph Correll, a research psychiatrist
at The Zucker Hillside Hospital in Glenn Oaks, N.Y., has followed
360 children ages 4 to 19 starting on second-generation anti-psychotic
drugs. Interim results found children gained mostly fat, some of it
deposited on their abdomens, which increases the risk of future heart
illness. With many putting on more than 7 percent of their baseline
body weight, they also were at risk for future heart attacks, strokes
and diabetes. "The gateway to these serious complications in
the future is the weight gain," Correll said. "The numbers
we found were very surprising and sobering."
A 12-week study of 50 youths published
in the 2002 Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry found Zyprexa and Risperdal were associated with "extreme
weight gain in adolescents, much higher than that reported in adults."
Risk of depression
Experts say the increased weight can also trigger depression.
"Oh gosh, it puts their self-esteem to the floor," said
Dr. Louis Kraus, Rush University Medical Center chief of child and
adolescent psychiatry.
Pharmaceutical companies, some of which
have been criticized for minimizing these drugs' negative effects,
say they are working to eliminate the weight gain problem. Eli Lilly
and Co., which makes Zyprexa, is looking into which patients gain
the most weight, said spokeswoman Marni Lemons. "It's possible
that a receptor that improves your functioning, improves your appetite,"
Lemons said. "Is it possible to create a drug that doesn't have
weight gain as a side effect? We don't know. We have researchers looking
into that."
Doctors also say they worry about how
the drugs work in growing bodies since long-term effects have not
been extensively studied in children. "We are learning about
the safety issues as we are using the drugs in children," said
Dr. Julie Zito, a University of Maryland pharmacy and psychiatry associate
professor who led the study showing the soaring use of these drugs
in youths. "In my mind, there is not sufficient data that establishes
them as effective and safe in children for long-term use." The
FDA has requested that five of these drugs be evaluated in children,
a spokesman said.
In the meantime, parents like Michelle
Mason struggle to balance the drugs' risk with their control over
paranoia, delusions, aggression, and, in Rachel's case, violent rages.
These often-destructive symptoms cannot be left untreated, experts
say. "If a child is psychotic they can't be in school, OK?"
said Suzanne Andriukaitis, executive director of the National Alliance
for the Mentally Ill in Chicago. "Overweight kids can be in school
and will have plenty of company."
On Zyprexa, Rachel was calm enough
to make friends--but she also felt alienated because she was larger
than her peers. She felt most like an outsider in 7th grade, when
athletes ruled the popular crowd. Rachel tried out for the cheerleading
squad but didn't make it. She ate by herself at lunch as some peers
called her names, making her cry. By 8th grade, Rachel had learned
to stay away from them and found friends like Becky Bradesku, a year
younger, whom Rachel met in church. They ate pizza and collected stationery.
Becky, attractive and thin, defended Rachel at school. Once, when
Rachel wished she were thin like Becky, the girl reminded Rachel that
God made her. "There's nothing wrong with that," Becky said.
In May, Rachel graduated from grammar
school. Waiting backstage among peers, she felt her place on the edge
of the social hemisphere was evident--seldom invited into pictures,
sitting off alone as girls examined one another, handing out compliments
that others did not always return. During the ceremony, a speaker
noted that years from now it would not matter how popular, pretty
or thin they all were.
In June, Rachel stopped taking Zyprexa
and began Risperdal. She had gained 50 pounds since the previous August,
and Rachel's psychiatrist feared she would be at risk for diabetes
and more teasing at school if she stayed on the drug. On the new drug,
Rachel has been in a good mood, but sometimes she still can't stop
eating, and her mother worries. "I would like to see her lose
weight, not just for her looks but for her health," the mother
said. Rachel's weight peaked in August at 266 pounds.
That same month, she started high school--the
"new world" she had been hoping for. She became an officer
in her first club--the Family, Career & Community Leaders of America.
She is getting good grades and has helped out as a greeter for visiting
volleyball teams. On Risperdal, Rachel's mood is better even than
her mother had expected. And since August, she has lost 2 pounds.
Best of all, Rachel has found new friends--not cheerleaders, but girls
who accept her. She plans to wear a navy blue satin dress when they
attend the homecoming dance next week, together.
Worried Colleges Step Up Efforts Over Suicide
Karen W. Arenson, New York Times- 12/3/2004
Nicole Thompson had been at Columbia University for only a few weeks
when she went out drinking with a group of friends downtown last year
and became separated from them. She had skipped her medication for
bipolar disorder. Now it was 3 a.m. and, crying and in a panic, she
called friends; she told them, she said, that she "just wished
the traffic would take me out."
Although she made it back to campus safely, her friends had already
notified Columbia that they were worried about her. For Columbia officials,
it was the first clue that Ms. Thompson faced any kind of mental health
problems. "I wasn't on Columbia's radar at all," said Ms.
Thompson, who is back on campus now after being forced to take a medical
leave.
Increasingly, college officials and
mental health experts have come to realize that many of the most vulnerable
students -- the ones prone to self-injury and suicide -- are like
Ms. Thompson: they never go near the counseling centers or reveal
anything about their experience before college. As a result, colleges
are stepping up efforts to find them and to get them into treatment,
sometimes forcing them to leave temporarily.
The goal is to help students like Ms.
Thompson. But colleges have more at stake. Suicide -- the second-biggest
cause of death among college students -- can be costly, injuring reputations
and prompting litigation. The suicide of a student at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Elizabeth Shin, in 2000, and strings of suicides
at New York University, George Washington University and the University
of Illinois, have drawn wide attention. There has also been a rise
in lawsuits involving student suicides.
Ann H. Franke, a vice president of
United Educators, a company that insures 1,200 universities, colleges
and schools, said suicide prevention had risen in priority as claims
had risen; her company, Ms. Franke said, now has a "handful"
of claims, up from none six years ago. "They can be very severe
claims financially," Ms. Franke said, "not to mention the
emotional and reputational impact they can have on a school."
In a closely watched case, the family of Elizabeth Shin has sued M.I.T.
for $27 million.
One study of suicides on college campuses,
based on a dozen universities in the 1980's, found a rate of about
7.5 per 100,000 students, which is about half the rate for young adults
not in college and represents about 1,100 suicides a year for the
entire college population. Although there have not been comparable
studies since then, most mental health experts say they believe the
rate has remained at about that level.
To address the problem, Emory University
and the University of North Carolina are inviting students to fill
out anonymous mental health questionnaires. Duke University is asking
faculty members to be alert to changes in behavior -- noticing, for
example, when a student suddenly becomes sullen or quiet, or stays
away from class. Columbia, New York University and Cornell now place
counselors in residence halls. The University of Illinois and the
University of Puget Sound in Tacoma, Wash., are requiring any student
who threatens or attempts suicide to attend counseling sessions.
But the best way to reach these students
remains unclear, and students do not always welcome the intervention.
Some experts fear that forcing students to enter treatment or to take
a medical leave can dissuade others from asking for help and discourage
their friends from sounding the alarm, even though students who take
such leaves generally come back and graduate.
The recent forced withdrawal of a freshman
at N.Y.U. was front-page news in the student newspaper, Washington
Square News. The student, Sue Schaller, told the paper that although
she had been briefly hospitalized for depression and suicidal thoughts,
she felt much better when she returned to campus and wanted to stay
in school, but that the university would not let her. An editorial
in the newspaper called for the university to "do everything
it can, including requiring therapy and regular check-ins, to ensure
that troubled students who wish to remain on campus can stay and that
they pose as little risk as possible," adding, "Pushing
those students out of the university community is not the answer."
In retrospect, Ms. Thompson, the Columbia student, said she had mixed
feelings about how the university treated her. She said she still
felt wounded by the process -- she called it a "charade"
-- that ejected her from school.
Even with things going smoothly, Ms.
Thompson, whose dark hair is tinted purple and who speaks with energy
and humor, said her mind sometimes wandered to what she missed last
year, while she was on leave, and to the possibility of running into
new trouble. "I am so scared about screwing up," she said,
"and of being sent home again." Columbia officials declined
to comment on Ms. Thompson's case. They said that the university did
not keep statistics on how many students were forced to go home, but
that there were few of them.
For years, colleges and universities
have been grappling with a growing flood of students with histories
of mental illness. Most have expanded the number of counselors and
the hours they are available. But now they are going further. Some
are turning to the Internet as a way to bring troubled students in
for help. The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention has developed
an anonymous online mental health questionnaire and a program to steer
troubled students to counseling, which is being tested at Emory and
the University of North Carolina. Those involved say the initial results
seem promising.
At Emory, which started using the program
in 2002, only 8 percent of the students who received the survey filled
it out, but 85 percent of those students were deemed at moderate or
high risk of suicide or other severe problems based on their responses
to the questionnaire. They are encouraged to speak to a counselor
on or off campus, or to consult anonymously with a counselor online.
"The yield is relatively small," said Ann Haas, research
director for the suicide-prevention foundation. "However, we
are absolutely convinced that those kids would not have gotten into
treatment. We think we are reaching the right kids."
Many campuses, including Duke and M.I.T.,
are asking faculty and staff members and students to tell a dean or
the counseling office if they see students who show signs of depression
or potential suicide. At Duke, when faculty members or parents relay
concerns about students to Larry Moneta, the vice president for student
affairs, he and members of the residence hall staff check up on the
students, sometimes surreptitiously. "Many times I've called
the residence hall staff and asked if they can dispatch a paraprofessional
to inadvertently drop by a student's room as if it were a casual encounter,"
Dr. Moneta said. "I do that all the time."
After Ms. Shin's suicide, M.I.T. began
running training sessions for faculty members, departmental administrators,
athletic coaches, dormitory personnel, fraternities and sororities
to help them spot people showing signs of problems -- one of several
steps recommended by a mental health task force created after the
suicide.
Cornell is making a special effort
to reach out to Asian and Asian-American students. Of 16 students
there who have committed suicide since 1996, 9 were of Asian descent.
The university created a task force to explore those students' experience
at Cornell and how to help them when they have problems, since they
do not use Cornell's counseling services at the same rate as their
classmates, said Susan H. Murphy, the university's vice president
for student and academic services. Often when they do seek help, "they
are in real crisis," Ms. Murphy said.
Colleges are also leaning more heavily
on students who show suicidal tendencies to enter counseling. Several
are examining or adopting a program developed by the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, requiring any student who threatens
or attempts suicide to attend at least four counseling sessions. Paul
Joffe, the program's director, said the results had been good: all
but one of nearly 2,000 students in the program over 20 years remained
at the university during the counseling sessions, and none committed
suicide. And although the university has had suicides among students
not in the program -- including six in the last academic year -- it
says its suicide rate is about half of what it was before the program
started.
While some college officials question
whether students should be forced into counseling, others favor the
heavy-handed approach. The University of Puget Sound, one of the campuses
that recently began using the Illinois approach, bluntly describes
the program as "a public statement that suicide is unacceptable
here." "We don't know what it is about that model that is
so effective," said Donn Marshall, director of counseling, health
and wellness services at Puget Sound. "Is it that somebody stands
up and says suicide is unacceptable? Or is it that somebody says,
'I care'? Or is it something about what happens in the four sessions
with a psychologist?"
When Ms. Thompson arrived at Columbia
last year from Nashville, she had been struggling with bipolar disorder
and problems with drinking and drugs, and she had a cabinetful of
medications. She had planned to contact the counseling service to
find someone to talk to, but three weeks into the school year, she
had not gotten around to it. She said she had arrived confident she
could succeed. "There was a big to-do before I went to school
to ask my doctors if I was ready," she said. "They all said
yes." What most put her off about the way Columbia handled her
case, she said, was the quick interview with a university psychologist
that she thought was intended to figure out what she needed to do
to stay at school, but that she later learned was to decide whether
she should be allowed to remain. She said she had been totally candid
in talking to him, because "I've talked to a lot of psychologists,
and realized that if you tried to butter them up, you don't get the
help you need." But she said she did not believe the university
had been equally candid. "He worked for the school, not the patient,"
she said. "If they don't tell you that, you lose trust. The kids
they are dealing with are smart enough to understand the dynamic after
the fact."
Margo D. Amgott, assistant vice president
for health services at Columbia, said the university tried to make
sure students understood that the interview was for the university's
evaluation purposes and even required that they sign a document saying
they understood. Ms. Thompson said that while she did indeed signed
papers, she had had no choice, and thought that the decision to stay
or leave would still be up to her and her family. But when she and
her father talked about lining up support for her in New York, they
learned that it was not their call, and she was given four days to
move out of her room. Being sent home to Nashville just three weeks
into her freshman year made her feel worse rather than better, she
said, and she ended up in a psychiatric hospital.
She said that now that she was back
at Columbia, she was doing well. She is majoring in anthropology and
has a late-night radio program, "Zombies vs. Ballerinas,"
that features groups like Mogwai. And while she is in regular touch
with a college adviser assigned to her, she has not sought psychological
help, either at Columbia or outside. "Last year's treatment was
so expensive that it has driven my father into debt," Ms. Thompson
said. "It makes me feel guilty."
Meth's Sexual Effect Explains Addictions
Associated Press, 12/3/2004
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. -- At a recent task force meeting on the epidemic
of methamphetamine use in Appalachia, Gov. Phil Bredesen winced when
a federal prosecutor described the illegal drug as an aphrodisiac.
Doctors and government officials don't like to talk much about it,
but there is an obvious reason people get hooked on methamphetamine:
sex. Meth eventually destroys the sex drive, but for a short while
it can boost sexual appetite and performance more powerfully than
drugs such as cocaine, doctors say. ``Who wouldn't want to use it?
You lose weight and you have great sex,'' Assistant U.S. Attorney
Paul Laymon said sarcastically at the meeting of the Tennessee task
force.
For obvious reasons, government officials
want to focus on the misery meth causes. Use of the addictive drug
can cause brain damage, violent behavior and hallucinations, and exposure
to the potentially explosive vapors during the manufacture of meth
can cause respiratory problems, headaches and nausea. In many gay
clubs in New York City and elsewhere, meth is often injected, putting
users and their partners at risk for HIV, hepatitis C and other sexually
transmitted diseases.
As for why the drug has such a hold
on people, Dr. Mary Holley, an obstetrician who runs a Mothers Against
Methamphetamine ministry in Albertville, Ala., and has interviewed
men and women addicted to meth, said sex is the No. 1 reason people
use it. ``The effect of an IV hit of methamphetamine is the equivalent
of 10 orgasms all on top of each other lasting for 30 minutes to an
hour, with a feeling of arousal that lasts for another day and a half,''
she said.
The effect doesn't last long. ``After
you have been using it about six months or so you can't have sex unless
you are high,'' Holley said. ``After you have been using it a little
bit longer you can't have sex even when you're high. Nothing happens.
It doesn't work.'' Dr. John Standridge, an addiction specialist with
the Council for Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services in Chattanooga, said
meth and other stimulants initially ``rev up the dopamine nervous
system in the brain. They rev it up and burn it out.''
A National Institute on Drug Abuse
survey on drug use and health in 2002 found that 12.4 million Americans
at least 12 years old -- or about 5 percent of the population -- had
tried meth at least once in their lifetimes. In a measure of how serious
the problem is in Appalachia, a total of 1,083 clandestine methamphetamine
labs were cleaned up in Tennessee in 2003 -- more than in any other
state. A meth task force appointed by Bredesen is recommending tougher
penalties and expanded treatment for addicts.
Meth's reputation as a sex drug is
not unique. ``All substance abuse is frequently marketed as enhancing
sex life or making you more attractive or a better social companion,''
said John Walters, the drug czar for President Bush. But he added
that buying meth as an aphrodisiac is ``buying under false pretenses.''
``Hair falls out. Teeth fall out,'' Walters said. ``That's not sexy.''
On the Net: Mothers Against Methamphetamine:
http://www.mamasite.net
Antidepressant Use By U.S. Adults Soars
Shankar Vedantam, Washington Post- 12/3/2004
One in 10 American women takes an antidepressant drug such as Prozac,
Paxil or Zoloft, and the use of such drugs by all adults has nearly
tripled in the last decade, according to the latest figures on American
health released yesterday by the federal government. Those numbers
are among a broad array of changes in health and health care use in
the United States identified in the report. It confirmed that prescription
drug costs are soaring faster than any other area of medical care
as ever-increasing numbers of Americans take drugs for psychiatric
conditions, to lower their cholesterol, to control asthma and for
a wide range of other reasons.
In 2002, the latest year for which
data were available, the total tab for health care soared to $1.6
trillion -- of which prescription drugs accounted for $162 billion,
the report found. Drug costs rose by 15 percent over the year before,
driven by a combination of more expensive medicines and increased
use.
The report comes at a time when questions
are growing about the costs and safety of many prescription drugs.
The Food and Drug Administration recently concluded that antidepressants
can increase the risk of suicidal behavior among children, and the
manufacturer of Vioxx abruptly recalled the popular painkiller for
safety reasons. A senior FDA official testified in Congress last month
that he believes five other approved drugs are dangerous and should
be taken off the market.
Antidepressant drugs called selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) showed some of the largest increases
in use, the report said. By 2000, the proportion of adults using such
drugs had nearly tripled, compared with the data set that ended in
1994.
In 2002, more than one in three doctor's
office visits by women involved a prescription for an antidepressant,
said Amy Bernstein, project director for the report issued by the
Center for Mental Health Services of the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. "It gives you an idea of what is happening during
these visits," said Bernstein, who explained that the statistic
included patients already on the drugs and those getting a new prescription.
The number of children getting psychiatric
drugs also soared. In 2002, about 6 percent of all boys and girls
were taking antidepressants, triple the rate in the period 1994-96.
And about 14 percent of boys -- nearly one in seven -- were on stimulant
drugs in 2002, double the number in 1994-96, the report found. Stimulant
drugs are usually used to treat attention deficit disorder. The number
of adults taking cholesterol-lowering statin drugs nearly quadrupled
from 1995-96 to 2001-02, the report found. Overall, 44 percent of
all Americans, including children, were taking at least one prescription
drug in 1999-2000, a statistically significant 5 percent increase
since 1994. The proportion taking three or more prescription drugs
increased from 12 to 17 percent during that same time, Bernstein said.
"Factors affecting the recent
increase in utilization of medications include the growth of third-party
insurance coverage for drugs, the availability of successful new drugs,
marketing to physicians and increasingly directly to consumers, and
clinical guidelines recommending increased utilization of medications
for conditions such as high cholesterol, acid-reflux disease, and
asthma," the report concluded.
Julie Zito, a pharmaco-epidemiologist
at the University of Maryland at Baltimore, said it is difficult to
characterize as good or bad the increased use of drugs without studies
that ask how people are faring as a result. "As the numbers keep
growing year after year after year, and larger proportions of the
population appear to be suffering from conditions or getting treatments
they may or may not be benefiting from, that would be an argument
to follow large cohorts of patients in community studies to assess
effectiveness and safety," she said.
The drug industry's umbrella trade
group said the increased use of medications is a good thing. "We
have more medicines and better medicines for more diseases, and patients
are being more effectively treated," said Jeff Trewhitt, a spokesman
for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. "They
are living longer largely because of new treatments, and that is good
news." Trewhitt said there are numerous examples of how increased
use of drugs -- such as cholesterol-lowering statins -- reduce overall
health care costs by controlling heart disease and reducing more expensive
hospitalizations. On the increase in antidepressant use, Trewhitt
said, "I don't know how to read that. We just don't have any
information -- it's not something we have studied."
Dad Cites Boy's Antidepressants in Deaths
Associated Press, 12/4/2004
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- Authorities say three years ago, Christopher Pittman,
then 12, shot his grandparents as they slept because they had scolded
him for fighting. But Christopher's father, Joe Pittman, thinks his
son killed because his sense of right and wrong was clouded by the
anti-depressant Zoloft. Joe Pittman spoke out against the drug in
a Food and Drug Administration hearing early this year. The boy, who
had threatened suicide, was put on the drug three weeks before the
slayings, and his dose was doubled just two days earlier. Joe Pittman's
hands shook as he read his son's confession to a roomful of strangers
during the hearing. ``I took everything out on my grandparents, who
I loved so very much,'' wrote then-12-year-old Christopher Pittman.
``When I was lying in my bed that night, I couldn't sleep because
my voice in my head kept echoing through my mind, telling me to kill
them.''
But prosecutors and police say Christopher's
actions during and after the November 2001 slayings show he clearly
knew what he was doing was wrong. The boy waited until his grandparents
were sleeping and took a pump-action shotgun from a gun cabinet. He
crept into the couple's dark bedroom, first shooting 66-year-old Joe
Frank Pittman in his open mouth, then firing into the back of 62-year-old
Joy Pittman's head. Christopher then set the house on fire and drove
off in the family car. When he got stuck on a dirt road 20 miles away,
he told hunters he was kidnapped by a man who killed his grandparents,
set the fire, drove him into the woods and ran away. Christopher was
living with his father's parents in hopes of turning his life around.
He told defense experts he felt abandoned by his mother and his relationship
with his father was rocky. No one answered phone calls to Joe Pittman's
home.
A month before the slayings, Christopher
was hospitalized in Florida, where his father lives, after he threatened
to kill himself. The boy was prescribed the anti-depressant Paxil,
but another doctor soon put him on Zoloft instead. Pittman decided
to send the boy to live with his grandparents in Chester County, a
rural area between Columbia and Charlotte, N.C.
Christopher, who turns 16 in April,
is being prosecuted as an adult and faces 30 years to life in prison
if convicted at his trial, set to start next month. His lawyers argue
that his case should be moved to Family Court, where if convicted,
he could only be kept in custody until he turns 21. Karen Menzies,
one of Christopher's lawyers and an attorney specializing in lawsuits
against anti-depressant makers, said medical research is available
to support the Zoloft defense.
In the three years the teen has spent
in jail awaiting trial, the FDA has become increasingly wary of doctors
prescribing Zoloft and other antidepressants for children. In October,
the agency ordered the drugs to carry ``black box'' warnings -- the
government's strongest warning short of a ban -- about increasing
the risk of suicidal behavior in children. ``The science has been
out there for a while. The prescription drug companies have been able
to hide it,'' Menzies said.
On the other side is Pfizer Inc., the
maker of Zoloft, which has aided the prosecution, according to Solicitor
John Justice, who has since taken himself off the case for health
reasons. The company has vigorously fought cases claiming antidepressants
cause violent or suicidal behavior. A spokesman responded to inquiries
by pointing out an October statement on the company's Web site addressing
concerns of suicide attempts, saying studies show ``no statistically
significant difference'' between children using Zoloft and nonusers.
The statement, though, does not discuss any possible link between
the drug and violent acts against others.
Trying to blame a drug for causing
someone to commit a crime is an uphill fight, but it has been done
successfully. In April, a Santa Cruz, Calif., jury acquitted a man
of attempted murder after he beat his friend, then blamed the episode
on Zoloft.
National Association of Criminal Defense
Lawyers spokesman Jack King said the ``Zoloft-made-me-do-it'' defense
likely means that the Pittman case will come down to defense vs. prosecution
experts. ``It's going to be a battle of whose experts the jury believes,''
King said. Christopher's maternal grandmother, Delnora Duprey, of
Wildwood, Fla., said her grandson is no longer on any medication and
is the ``sweet, quiet, laid-back'' boy she knew growing up. ``He's
the old Christopher again.'' Menzies said the teenager is getting
good grades and behaving behind bars.
Duprey says the ``whole entire family
is behind Christopher 150 percent.'' She thinks Zoloft had to have
caused Christopher to kill his grandparents because he loved them
both, especially the grandfather he called ``Pop-Pop.'' ``We used
to joke that he was his Pop-Pop's shadow,'' Duprey said.
However, those who dealt with the boy
after the crime feel differently. ``Anybody who could kill his grandparents
in the fashion he did shouldn't be let loose on the public at age
21. And that would have been the best-case scenario,'' said former
prosecutor Justice, who pushed to move the case to adult court. The
current prosecutor, Barney Giese of Columbia, said through his office
that he doesn't talk about cases before they go to trial. Chester
County Sheriff Robbie Benson said interviews with Christopher left
him shaken because he could not believe the lack of remorse. ``This
was cold-blooded.'' Menzies said those observations might help her
case. ``The boy was still suffering from the side-effects of this
medication after the incident,'' she said. ``I think we see a different
Christopher now.''
Pastor Decried After Child's Arms Severed
Asssociated Press, 12/5/2004
PLANO, Texas -- Long before Dena Schlosser took a blade to her baby's
arms, her parents had begun to worry. In the years after she moved
to Texas with her husband and children, their gentle, dependent daughter
had become increasingly isolated. And, according to her stepfather,
she was dangerously consumed by a self-described prophet and his church.
Dena's stepfather, Mick Macaulay, said that although he blames mental
illness for Schlosser severing the arms of 10-month-old daughter Margaret
and leaving her to die, he believes the teachings of Doyle Davidson
also played a role. ``I don't think there's any question that what
we saw happen here is postpartum psychosis,'' Macaulay said in a telephone
interview. ``But that doesn't mean there aren't dynamics in force
to push the person toward the psychotic break.''
Schlosser was charged with capital
murder after police found the 35-year-old mother on Nov. 22 covered
in blood in her living room, still holding a knife. Macaulay said
Schlosser had been emotionally dependent on her mother since childhood,
when she had several operations to remove an abnormal amount of fluid
from her brain. After the surgeries, Schlosser's brain functions seemed
normal. She went on to college in Illinois, married her husband John
and became a mother. The Schlossers moved to Texas about five years
ago. John soon lost his job and began working for himself as a consultant.
The family had to trade their spacious home for a small apartment,
and a midwife delivered Margaret because they had no health insurance.
The stress of money, a new baby and a mother who has Parkinson's disease
affected Schlosser. Child Protective Services investigated her for
neglect in January after she left the newborn alone and her 5-year-old
daughter was seen chasing her mother down the street on a bicycle.
Schlosser received psychiatric treatment for postpartum depression
and the agency determined she was stable in August.
By then, though, Schlosser's association
with Davidson's church had intensified, Macaulay said. He said Davidson
used violent imagery and told women they possessed a rebellious ``Jezebel''
spirit, and that they should submit to their husbands, he said. '`I'm
not saying that anybody suggested 'Go cut your baby's arms off,'''
said Macaulay, a mental health counselor who lives with Schlosser's
mother, Connie, in Canada. ``This diminishing of women, this diminishing
of women's powers, women's importance, referring to women as jezebels,
I think, further undermines an already fragile ego state that Dena's
experiencing.''
That's absurd, the 72-year-old minister
said. ``I'm an apostle and I'm a prophet,'' Davidson said. ``I only
teach what's in the Bible and that's what makes them mad.'' Davidson,
a former veterinarian, said God told him to start Water of Life Ministries
in suburban Dallas in the early 1980s. His sermons, based on literal
interpretations of the Bible, are available on his Web site and broadcast
on TV and radio in several states. He refers to Methodist, Catholic
and Baptist denominations as cults and believes the Ten Commandments
apply only to the disobedient, not the righteous. Davidson doesn't
deny his teachings are unconventional. He said he avoids violent imagery,
but he does teach that women are weaker and should submit to their
husbands. He also said he isn't well-liked by much of the religious
community, and he was removed from the Daystar Television Network,
a major Christian broadcaster, after his sermons offended top officials.
In September, Davidson was arrested
on a public intoxication charge after a couple, longtime members of
his church, called 911, alleging the minister attacked them at their
home. Davidson said he was only trying to cast the devil out of the
wife, who had become rebellious and rejected his teachings. He said
he entered the home with the permission of her husband. The couple
told police Davidson choked the woman. The couple declined to press
assault charges and several calls by the AP to their home went unanswered.
Davidson said he believes the incident was a ``setup of Satan himself
to try and destroy my ministry.''
Davidson claimed he's had little interaction
with Dena since the Schlossers began attending his roughly 200-member
church in 2002. But Macaulay said Schlosser, who spoke to her mother
almost daily by phone, talked incessantly about Davidson, urging them
to listen to sermons on his Web site. Macaulay said they listened
to about 60 hours of sermons, which only fed their concern. Macaulay
said Schlosser started using prayer instead of antibiotics when her
children were sick and was convinced Davidson could cure her mother
of Parkinson's. When Connie Macaulay visited two years ago, Schlosser
had Davidson ``lay hands on'' her mother to drive out evil spirits
and disease. ``Dena was so confident that Connie was cured that they
threw out her medicine,'' Macaulay said. Schlosser's husband, John,
also supported the minister. His personal Web site contains several
Bible passages and a link to Davidson's Web site. He has refused to
give media interviews.
Macaulay said that as he and his wife
struggle to understand their daughter's unthinkable crime, the minister
is ever-present on their minds. ``(Connie) looked at me somewhat plaintively
after she had a good cry the other day and said 'I hope Dena won't
go back to that church,''' he said.
'Improvement' Seen in Mom Who Cut Off Baby's Arms
Associated Press, 12/6/2004
DALLAS - A mother who has appeared disoriented since she was charged
with capital murder for severing her baby's arms is improving under
medication she is receiving in jail, her attorney said today. Dena
Schlosser, 35, who was hospitalized early this year for postpartum
depression, was arrested Nov. 22 after she told a 911 operator she
cut off the arms of 10-month-old Margaret. Police found Schlosser
in her living room, covered in blood and holding a knife. Attorney
David Haynes, who has said Schlosser is incompetent to stand trial,
said she is responding to medication that she's been taking for several
days. "I see some signs of improvement, but I think she's still
pretty confused," Haynes said.
Schlosser remained in the Collin County
Jail on a $1.25 million bond set late Friday, Haynes said. Her first
appearance in court was set for Dec. 14. Haynes said it could be next
year before the district attorney's office decides whether to pursue
the death penalty. Haynes would not provide details about his discussions
with Schlosser or say how much she understands about her situation.
Schlosser's stepfather, Mick Macaulay, said he has not been in contact
with his stepdaughter. But he said her husband, John Schlosser, told
him in a phone conversation that she was "very, very sad."
Texas' Child Protective Services had
investigated Schlosser for neglect in January after she left the newborn
alone and her 5-year-old daughter was seen chasing her mother down
the street on a bicycle. CPS closed the investigation in August after
Schlosser received psychiatric treatment for postpartum depression
and the agency determined she was stable. CPS took temporary custody
of Schlosser's two older girls, ages 6 and 9, after the baby was killed,
pending an investigation.
Tracking Stress and Depression Back to the Womb
Laurie Tarkan, New York Times- 12/7/2004
By listening intently to movements and heartbeats, researchers are
finding that the fetuses of mothers who are stressed or depressed
respond differently from those of emotionally healthy women. After
birth, studies indicate, these infants have a significantly increased
risk of developing learning and behavioral problems, and may themselves
be more vulnerable to depression or anxiety as they age.
The studies, researchers caution, are
preliminary. Stress or depression during a mother's pregnancy is only
one among many influences that affect an infant's development. Even
among mothers who are depressed or highly stressed, the rate of emotional
and behavioral problems in children is still very low. "The last
thing pregnant women need is to have something else to worry about,"
said Dr. Janet DiPietro, a developmental psychologist at the Johns
Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The studies reflect growing evidence
that stress and depression can have early and lasting effects on a
child's life. If the findings hold up, experts say, they could eventually
lead obstetricians, midwives and other health professionals who care
for pregnant women to include mental health screening as a routine
part of prenatal examinations. Such screening could allow doctors
to recommend therapy or treatment for pregnant women who suffer from
depression or other disorders. "We could be intervening earlier,"
said Dr. Catherine Monk, an assistant professor in the psychiatry
department at the College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia.
"Prenatal care is an optimal time to do mental health screening,
but we don't."
The effects of stress on a fetus have
been well documented in animal studies. In rats, researchers have
found, babies born to stressed mothers show permanent changes in brain
chemistry and behavior. For example, rat pups exposed prenatally to
elevated levels of the stress hormone corticosterone were born with
reduced numbers of corticosterone receptors in the brain, and the
animals showed exaggerated responses to stress. In humans, there is
convincing evidence that mothers who are stressed in pregnancy are
more likely to give birth to preterm or infants with low birth weights.
In recent years, scientists have begun
to home in on more subtle effects, studying how unborn fetuses respond
to their mothers' anxiety or depression, the emotional health of the
infants after birth and how they fare later in childhood. Some studies
have offered unusual glimpses into the symbiotic relationship between
a mother and a developing child.
Dr. Monk has looked at the increase
and decrease in a fetus's heart rate when its mother is under stress.
In one study, women who were in the third trimester of pregnancy went
through psychological screening for depression and anxiety. They were
then asked to perform a series of stress-inducing computer tasks.
As expected, all the women showed increases in heart rate, respiration
and blood pressure. The responses of the fetuses were more varied.
The fetuses of mothers who were depressed or had anxious personality
styles showed increases in heart rates. In contrast, the heart rates
of fetuses whose mothers were emotionally healthy showed no fluctuations.
Dr. Monk said the fetuses were not simply mimicking their mothers'
responses. "What this leaves us with is another interpretation,"
she said. "The fetuses of depressed or high anxious women are
more reactive to stimuli than other fetuses." She compared the
fetuses' responses to the way people in a waiting room might react
differently to a door being slammed. In this case, a fetus might be
reacting to the mother's increased heartbeat or breathing, or to a
jolt of stress hormones.
Dr. Monk said depressed women tended
to have more difficulty handling stress, which leads to higher levels
of stress hormones like cortisol. She speculated that those higher
levels, in turn, might make the fetus more jumpy "My hypothesis
is that over the course of gestation, they have been exposed to an
altered in utero environment, which includes increased levels of stress
hormones," Dr. Monk said. "This may make fetuses more susceptible
to stressors in the future, and by extension, because stress plays
a role in the development of depression, may make them more vulnerable
to depression in the future."
Though stress and depression are closely
intertwined, researchers believe that stress is the more potent player
in affecting prenatal development. In a study by Dr. DiPietro, pregnant
women who perceived their lives, and in particular their pregnancies,
as stressful, had fetuses who were more active in an ultrasound test.
Other studies have linked higher levels of stress hormones in the
mother with a more active fetus. Dr. DiPietro has found that more
active fetuses tend to become more active 1-year-olds, providing some
evidence that the effects are not transient.
In newborns, researchers have also
found that the effects of a mother's depression lingered. A study
published this year in Infant Behavior & Development compared
70 depressed pregnant women with 70 women who were not depressed.
The study found that compared with the infants of the healthy mothers,
the newborns of mothers with depression symptoms had higher cortisol
levels and lower levels of dopamine and serotonin, two neurotransmitters
that have been tied to depression. The newborns also had less developed
learning skills, they were less responsive to social stimulation,
and they were less able to calm themselves when agitated, said Dr.
Tiffany Field, the author of the study and director of the Touch Research
Institutes at the University of Miami School of Medicine.
In another study, Dr. Monk put newborn
babies in specially designed bassinets that were tilted 30 degrees
up or down, a standard method of testing a newborn's responsiveness.
When a baby's head is down, the heart rate normally decreases in response
to the stress. But newborns with depressed mothers showed a smaller
decrease in heart rate, suggesting that they were less able to adapt
to stress.
What begins in the womb persists into
childhood, researchers find. In a study published in 2002 in The British
Journal of Psychiatry, researchers asked 7,448 women in England to
assess their level of stress while they were pregnant and answer questionnaires
about their children's behavior at age 4. The study found that children
whose mothers reported high levels of anxiety in late pregnancy were
more likely to have behavior problems - most notably attention difficulties
- as 4-year-olds. "Women who scored in the top 15 percent of
anxiety had double the risk of having a child with severe behavioral
problems," said Dr. Thomas O'Connor, a professor of psychiatry
at the University of Rochester, who is an author of the study. The
children in the study had a 10 percent chance of having such problems,
Dr. O'Connor said, compared with a 5 percent risk among children in
the general population.
Dr. Vivette Glover, a perinatal psychobiologist
at Imperial College London and another author of the study, noted
that even though the children of stressed mothers were at increased
risk, the rate of behavior problems remained very low. "Even
with this anxious group of women, 90 percent of children don't have
these behavioral problems," Dr. Glover said. "So even if
a woman is pretty anxious, her children are probably going to be fine."
Screening pregnant women for mental
health problems is quite likely to be controversial. "In terms
of public health, it's very important if we could reduce the incidence
of behavioral problems by treating women during pregnancy," Dr.
Glover said. She noted that cognitive behavioral therapy had proven
highly successful in treating adults who suffer severe anxiety.
Some researchers say that any recommendation
for screening and treatment during pregnancy is premature because
the research is still preliminary. They point to studies suggesting
that a mother's stress may in some cases be beneficial to her fetus.
In one study, 2-year-olds whose mothers reported high levels of anxiety
in pregnancy had better motor and cognitive skills than children whose
mothers did not report being highly anxious. Some experts say a fetus's
awareness that its mother is stressed may serve an evolutionary purpose,
preparing it for entry into a difficult world. "If a fetus is
constantly going to be threatened after he is born, and there's danger
to its well-being, it may make sense for it to develop a system that
produces big responses to stress," said Dr. Pathik D. Wadhwa,
director of the Behavioral Perinatology Research Program at the University
of California, Irvine.
|