Noteworthy News Articles on Mental Health Topics, October 21-31, 2006
Living With Love, Chaos and Haley
Pam Belluck, New York Times- 10/22/2006
PLYMOUTH, Mass. — When Haley Abaspour started seeing things that were not there — bugs and mice crawling on her parents’ bed, imaginary friends sitting next to her on the couch, dead people at a church that housed her preschool — her parents were unsure what to think. After all, she was a little girl. “I thought for a long time, ‘She’s just gifted,’ ” said her father, Bejan Abaspour. “‘This is good. Don’t worry about it.’ ”
But as Haley got older, things got worse. She developed tics — dolphin squeaks, throat-clearing, clenching her face and body as if moving her bowels. She heard voices, banging, cymbals in her head. She became anxiety-ridden over run-of-the-mill things: ambulance sirens, train rides. Her mood switched suddenly from excitedly chatty to inconsolably distraught. “It’s like watching ‘The Sound of Music’ and ‘The Exorcist’ all at the same time,” Mr. Abaspour said.
For her family, life with Haley, now 10, has been a turbulent stream of symptoms, diagnoses, medications, unrealized expectations. Diagnosed as a combination of bipolar disorder with psychotic features, obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and Tourette’s syndrome, her illness dominates every moment, every relationship, every decision.
Haley’s fears, moods and obsessions seep into her family’s most pedestrian routines — dinnertime, bedtime, getting ready for school. Excruciating worries permeate her parents’ sleep; unanswerable questions end in frustrated hopes. “The first time we took Haley to the hospital, I guess I expected that they would put it all back together,” said her mother, Christine Abaspour. “But it’s never all back together.”
At least six million American children have difficulties that are diagnosed as serious mental disorders, according to government surveys — a number that has tripled since the early 1990’s. Most are treated with psychiatric medications and therapy. The children sometimes attend special schools. But while these measures can help, they often do not help enough, and the families of such children are left on their own to sort through a cacophony of conflicting advice. The illness, and sometimes the treatment, can strain marriages, jobs, finances. Parents must monitor medications, navigate therapy sessions, arrange special school services. Some families must switch neighborhoods or schools to escape unhealthy situations or to find support and services. Some keep friends and relatives away. Parents can feel guilt, anger, helplessness. Siblings can feel neglected, resentful or pressure to be problem-free themselves. “It kind of ricochets to other family members,” said Dr. Robert L. Hendren, president-elect of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. “I see so many parents who just hurt badly for their children and then, in a sense, start hurting for themselves.”
Ms. Abaspour, 39, struggles to master the details of Haley’s illness, to answer her obsessive questions, to keep her occupied. Mr. Abaspour, 50, who long believed that “Haley was going to grow out of it,” has been gripped by anxious thoughts and intrusive images that rattle him to tears on the hourlong commute to his job as an anesthesia engineer at a Boston hospital. He imagines people being crushed by trucks, someone hurting Haley, his own death. Haley’s sister, Megan, 13, has been so focused on Haley and determined not to add to her family’s burden that in June, after a quarrel with her parents, she tied a T-shirt around her neck in a suicidal gesture. “I feel like she gets all the problems and I feel like I have to take some of that off of her,” Megan said. “It’s really difficult a lot to try to stay away from babying her and helping her. I try to stay still but it just hurts, it hurts inside.”
Haley, with her shy smile and obsidian eyes, is increasingly aware of her own problems, although she cannot always express exactly what is going on inside. “My mind says I need some help” is the way she explained it recently. Her illness has caused great financial strain; although the Abaspours have health insurance, they have been forced to draw on their savings and lean heavily on their credit cards for living expenses. Still, they have bought a trailer in a New Hampshire campground because there Haley finds occasional solace, and relatives nearby understand the family’s ordeal. The family wrestles with deciding whom to tell about Haley’s illness, and what to say. Her worst symptoms are most visible at home and less apparent at the public school and the state-financed therapeutic after-school program she attends. Her parents say she works hard to hold herself together during the day and then later, feeling more comfortable with her family, falls apart.
This disparity in behavior is not uncommon, said Dr. Joseph A. Jackson IV, Haley’s psychiatrist, and “parents often get the brunt.” Because of the contrast in Haley’s public and private behavior, her parents are wary of telling people that she is mentally ill, as they might not notice. “I don’t want anybody to pity her,” Mr. Abaspour said. But they also get frustrated when teachers or relatives play down the seriousness of Haley’s illness, or conclude that she is being manipulative or that another child-rearing approach would help. In the middle of last year, for example, a teacher did not understand Haley’s need to leave the classroom to quiet the voices or relieve anxiety. Haley grew so frustrated that she “would sit there in her chair and cry,” her father said. The parents pressed school officials to switch her to another class. “We’re sick and tired of trying to prove it to people,” Ms. Abaspour said. Her husband added, “Everybody thinks they have the solution. When Joe Schmo comes over for a drink, he says, ‘Try this, this will work.’ No, it won’t.”
Visions and Voices
From birth, it was clear that “I was dealing with something different,” Ms. Abaspour said. Displaying a photo album with picture after picture of Megan all smiles and Haley “crying, crying, crying,” she added, “We just thought we had a very difficult child.” Yet exactly what was wrong puzzled them for years, and even now, Ms. Abaspour said, “Every day it’s something new, I swear.”
While increasing awareness of childhood mental illness has helped many children and families, it can also create a misimpression that everything can be treated, said Dr. Glen R. Elliott, chief psychiatrist at the Children’s Health Council, a community mental health service in Palo Alto, Calif., and the author of “Medicating Young Minds: How to Know if Psychiatric Drugs Will Help or Hurt Your Child.” That can make families with complex cases feel “either genuine confusion or pretend certainty,” Dr. Elliott said.
The Abaspours decided to speak with a reporter about Haley’s illness and its impact on their family because they hoped it would help other families and make society more hospitable for children like their daughter. Talking about it was sometimes emotional, especially for Mr. Abaspour, whose eyes often clouded with tears. But they also said they found it useful to articulate their feelings.
When Haley was 3 or 4, a pediatrician blamed tonsillitis-induced sleep apnea, predicting that after her tonsils were removed, “ ‘you’ll see a totally different child,’ ” Ms. Abaspour recalled. “We thought, ‘This is what is wrong with our child. This is our answer,’ ” she said. Preschool teachers suggested a learning disability. Later, Haley repeated first grade. The Abaspours consulted therapists about the visions of friends in the liner of the family’s pool and riding with Haley on her bike, and the voices criticizing her or telling her to touch a certain table. When a neurologist ruled out medical causes like Lyme disease, Ms. Abaspour recalled, her husband said, “I think we should just give her a placebo — it’s all in her head.” They got a cat, “though we weren’t cat people,” Ms. Abaspour said. Then they got another because the first was “not the type of cat that Haley could throw over her shoulder and squeeze.”
New symptoms kept emerging. For a while, when she was about 7, the voices “were telling her she was a boy,” Ms. Abaspour said. “She had to constantly prove to them that she wasn’t.” Haley became obsessed with penises, which she called “bums.” She claimed to see them though she was looking at fully clothed men and boys, her mother said. “Then she felt guilty. She would come up to me and whisper, ‘I saw his bum, I saw his bum.’ The bus driver or the little boy, anyone. It was constant.” To halt the whispering, Ms. Abaspour suggested that they share a private signal: Haley could flash a thumbs-up after a sighting. Haley also seemed preoccupied with death, and on a highway would say that voices told her, “If that license plate didn’t say such and such, she was going to die,” her mother said. Once, Mr. Abaspour recalled, Haley “kept yelling that she wants to start over.”
The Treatment Puzzle
When she was almost 8, Haley visited Dr. Jackson at his office at the Cambridge Health Alliance. He was struck by the results of a screening: Haley met full criteria for virtually every mental disorder listed. “Her symptoms,” he said, “suggested anxiety, morbid thoughts, obsessions possibly of a sexual nature, frequent fluctuations in mood, periods of euphoria, giddiness, irritability, rapid speech, auditory and visual hallucinations, thought disorganization, vocal tics, distractibility, poor socialization in school, sensory integration issues, attention impulse disorder, manic behavior, sleep disturbance.” Dr. Jackson wondered if the voices and the friends, which Haley told him were “nowhere but everywhere,” were schizophrenic-like hallucinations or milder thought distortions. He also saw Haley’s mood swing from anxiety about a “disturbing dream in which her mother was killed” to euphoria, as she gleefully drew a large, brightly colored butterfly and a self-portrait with a too-big smile and a skirt that ballooned as if she were floating. The pictures, he said, “scream” manic sensibility, suggesting bipolar disorder.
Dr. Jackson prescribed an antipsychotic, Risperdal, one of a dozen drugs Haley would try. Some helped initially, but the voices returned or side effects developed. Huge pills or bad-tasting liquid made Haley gag or throw fits. “It was horrible, horrible, horrible,” her mother said, “and she’d pull us into it because we had to make her take it.” Lithium caused weight gain: clothes that fit her one day no longer did the next.
When Haley was 81/2, Mr. Abaspour said, “Let’s drop all of these medications and see what happens.” He said, “I wanted to see her true self.” The results chastened them. “You see her fine one day,” Mr. Abaspour said. “The second day comes and she’s fine and you say, ‘You see, honey, there’s nothing wrong with her.’ Then it’s the third day and she goes crazy and you feel like an idiot.”
Haley resumed taking Risperdal. Then, abruptly, her condition worsened. “She couldn’t function, she couldn’t go to school,” said Ms. Abaspour, who took Haley to a hospital; she had to handle the crisis with her husband away in London. In the emergency room, Haley was manic and hyperarticulate, Ms. Abaspour recalled. “I was a basket case.” When Mr. Abaspour returned and saw Haley “like a zombie” in a hospital full of out-of-control children, his first reaction was, “She can’t be in here.” But the eight-day hospital stay made him grasp the severity of her illness. “You look at an X-ray and you say it’s a fracture,” he said. “But this thing. ... Before then, there wasn’t solid evidence.” A year later, school halls “would get scary because the voices would get louder,” so Haley constantly visited the school’s nurse and psychologist, her mother said. “She was going out of her mind.”
Haley was hospitalized again, and another antipsychotic drug, Abilify, muffled the voices. “I remember thinking, ‘Am I supposed to be happy about this?,’ ” Ms. Abaspour said. She was grateful that something helped but distressed at the suggestion that Haley was psychotic. The Abilify has not soothed Haley’s anxiety or stopped her outbursts. And despite increases in the dosage, back are the voices (four boys and a girl), the tics (eye squinting and hand clenching) and the “bums.”
Dr. Jackson, her psychiatrist, said Haley’s biggest asset was her “very caring family” that was “seeking ways to shore themselves up” to better help her. Ms. Abaspour said: “We ask ourselves sometimes, ‘Why? Why did it happen to us?’ Other times we see a child bald, going through chemotherapy. That’s the thing about this — it’s on the inside, you can’t see it.”
Megan’s Heartache
I pretend no one is around me when my sister is there.
I feel a constant hurt inside.
I touch a rainbow of joyfulness in my mind when my sister and I are FINALLY having a fun
laugh together.
I worry that when one day I die, I won’t be there to help my sister.
I cry to the stars, pleading them to take me away from this madness at mind.
Megan’s sixth-grade writing assignment was to write a poem called “I Am.” Virtually every line was about Haley. Megan wrote of love, frustration, obligation, pain, embarrassment. Eighteen months later, those feelings erupted. Told to do dishes before calling a friend, Megan felt that the chore should be Haley’s and stormed to her room. When her father said it was Megan’s responsibility, “I really got mad and slammed the door,” she recalled. “He came and ripped my phone right out of the wall.” That was unusual for Mr. Abaspour, usually gentle or quietly humorous. “I tried not to say something that would hurt her,” he said. “And definitely not to touch her. So I took it out on the phone.” Megan said her reaction was, “Why should I live?”
“I took a T-shirt and I put it around my neck,” she said. “Then I said, ‘No I shouldn’t do this. I want to live but I don’t know another way out.’" Siblings of mentally ill children often have such feelings, experts said.
Ten days of treatment helped Megan understand that “I felt pretty much like I was another mom for Haley,” she said. The Abaspours, who always gave Megan positive attention, were stunned. But Ms. Abaspour said she might have unconsciously been relieved that Megan could get Haley to laugh, or in other ways “take a little attention off me.”
For Megan, a doctor prescribed Prozac, but she became edgy and the suicidal thoughts continued. “When I’m doing dishes and I see a knife there, my mind’s like, ‘Pick up the knife and kill yourself,’ ” Megan said. “I kind of just think, ‘Would things be easier without me?’ ” Now she has stopped taking medication and is seeing a psychiatrist. Her parents are encouraging her to focus more on herself. She realizes, she said, “I’m important.” Still, trying not to help Haley is hard. “I don’t really feel the pain that she feels,” Megan said, “but I feel that I should to make it even between us.”
Haley’s mother calls it “the ongoing search” — Haley’s obsessive quest for novelty and for objects to hold or to stroke over her touch-sensitive skin. “I need something to calm me down so I can learn how to end my frustration,” Haley said. “I just get, like, sometimes, mad. I need to, like, hold it or hug it or just play with it.” She and her family search through stores, scavenge through her crawlspace storage area and her bedroom full of Beanie Babies, toy cars, dolls. Megan said she sometimes offered her own belongings for Haley, thinking, “if I get excited about it she’ll decide it’s the right thing.”
But, Ms. Abaspour said, “she’s never satisfied.” Because her parents sometimes brush the hair on her arm with a surgical brush from Mr. Abaspour’s hospital, the family’s therapist recently suggested getting a soft lambskin. Haley fixated on buying one, always asking as if it were a new thought: “Oh my God, you know what just came to mind? If I get that animal fur...” Megan found her a faux shearling vest to stroke instead, but Haley exploded. “I wanted Megan to find something like that animal fur,” she wailed, convulsing and weeping. Anguished as he watched her, Mr. Abaspour said: “This is the point of no return. She’ll scream and cry and kick. If the neighbors could hear, they would think we were abusing the kid.”
Haley refuses to be consoled or touched, all the while saying, “Please help me, please make it stop, please make it go away,” her mother said. The Abaspours look on helplessly or send her to another room. Haley’s eruptions, often 20 minutes long, occur almost daily, especially in the evenings. They often begin with Haley revved up. Before the lambskin incident, for example, she marched around, chatting giddily about camp: “Today, today, today, we, um, instead of two periods of the game thingies, they call it sessions, periods, each session or whatever, we went to the picnic tables and we all went to the picnic tables and it was really fun.”
Haley’s parents struggled to track her unspooling sentences and scrambled thoughts. “Did you follow the bouncing ball?” Ms. Abaspour asked her husband, who replied, “I don’t even see the ball, honey.” Haley sighs, frowns and fidgets, eyes drooping before she falls apart. Sometimes she hyperventilates or crawls under a table. It always ends with crying, but sometimes she will start to laugh through her tears, becoming “all chipper again, like manic,” Mr. Abaspour said. Adds Ms. Abaspour: Later, “she says, ‘I’m sorry, I’m sorry,’ apologizing for who she is.” Her father said: “It’s not like a hurt that you can kiss better. It comes from within, and she doesn’t know why, and you can’t do anything about it.”
A Mother’s Stoicism
Christine Abaspour, the youngest of four girls raised by a divorced mother, knew what she wanted early in life. At 19, she left Massachusetts, joined a sister in Florida and became a waitress. At 25, she met her husband-to-be, who was 11 years older. She was engaged in two weeks, married in nine months and a mother a year later. “We both wanted to have children right away, like you wouldn’t believe,” she recalled.
Ms. Abaspour said that she had no regrets, and that Haley “was given to us for some reason, and I keep waiting for the day when I realize why.” Still, the experience has tested her stamina, and she avoids capitulating to Haley’s whims and outbursts by imposing structure, consistency, even distance. “I’m her mother,” Ms. Abaspour said. “I try to make it a better world for her, a more comfortable world. I stay very strong for her and very encouraging for her. If she comes out of a meltdown, I’ll say, ‘I knew that you could.’ I don’t make her feel totally hopeless. It doesn’t give me any satisfaction, though, because I still feel helpless. Unfortunately it just bites you in the face all day long.” Ms. Abaspour’s stoic approach, which her husband appreciates but cannot always emulate, is “a good coping skill for parents,” Dr. Elliott, of the Children’s Health Council, said. “It’s what happens to a family system when you’ve got a source of chaos in the middle of it.”
After getting Haley ready for school, Ms. Abaspour feels she has already lived an entire day. In the afternoon, “Haley walks in the door and I just want to hold her and give her a big kiss like most kids,” Ms. Abaspour said. “Instead I get a frown and tears and ‘Ooh, I had such a stressful day.’ ” She said that every evening, a distraught Haley will “say to me her same 12 questions: ‘What’s going to happen when I need to go to school and I can’t leave the classroom?’ or ‘What do I have to look forward to today?’ ” By bedtime, Ms. Abaspour said, “your heart’s just breaking.”
To slake Haley’s thirst for “something to do,” Ms. Abaspour keeps her involved in activities outside of school. Otherwise, the family ends up stopping for ice cream or concocting other outings, because unstructured time allows Haley to focus on the voices and anxiety. “Staying home is not an option,” Ms. Abaspour said. “Honestly I could not keep her busy. Sometimes being around here on a Saturday or Sunday, it’s almost toxic. She has multiple episodes — it’s like living hell.”
Haley’s fears of noises, crowded streets and surprises force the Abaspours to forgo amusement parks, apple picking or other traditional family activities. When relatives visit “and you think it’s going to be relaxing and we’ll watch movies and eat popcorn — that doesn’t happen in this family,” Ms. Abaspour said. Instead, there are mood cycles, as when Haley marched around announcing, “I’m going to make a really great art project,” then fell apart, wailing, “I don’t know what to do.” Ms. Abaspour stays unflustered. When Haley bawled, “I don’t have any markers,” her mother replied, “Oh, don’t tell me you don’t have.” But she found Haley a T-shirt to cut up and draw on, saying, “If I can get her to do that kind of chop, chop, chop, mark, mark, mark, it kind of brings her back.”
Ms. Abaspour said she had watched “everyone else in the family rush over to her, and I won’t become a part of that. I make her be responsible for her own feelings because I can’t be responsible for those. You still have to be a regular parent. Honestly, she has to learn to soothe herself.”
But Ms. Abaspour doggedly monitors Haley’s progress. This summer, she visited Haley at day camp and was dismayed that the child frequently declined to participate, asking for the nurse. Sitting out the swim period one day, Haley, wearing a “Keep It Cool” T-shirt, listed her feelings on a worksheet: “stressed, axxouis, sick, shacky.” At lunch, she mostly licked salt off pretzels. Asked to choose a word-card matching her emotions, she picked “overwhelmed.”
Ms. Abaspour worries that as Haley becomes a teenager, her poor social skills might get her “mixed up with the wrong kids” or lead her to use illegal drugs. So she arranges play dates, but if friends are unavailable “it’s the end of the world,” she said. If they are available, she said, Haley anxiously asks, “What do I say, Mommy?”
Ms. Abaspour was recently laid off from a medical assistant’s job. Her former co-workers understood her need to interrupt work to deal with Haley’s needs, she said, and “didn’t look at me and say, ‘Her child’s crazy.’ ” Now she fears she will not find an employer who is as tolerant, though the family needs the income. Haley’s illness, the Abaspours were dismayed to discover, does not qualify for disability assistance.
In August, Ms. Abaspour arranged an elaborate 50th-birthday surprise party for her husband. They were “not always on the same page” about Haley at first, she said, but their strong marriage helps her handle the strain. So do bright spots, she said, like the day Haley “really kissed me.” Still, she can get overwhelmed. Sometimes she bolts awake at night, but she declines medication. “I can’t climb in a shell and stay there forever,” she said, “although it seems like some days where I’d want to be.”
A Father’s Anxiety
As a young man, Bejan Abaspour worried, especially about family. Twenty years ago, for example, when his sister’s son was born, “I pictured my nephew getting Super Glue in his eyes and I was calling my sister saying, ‘Make sure you keep Super Glue away from him.’ ”
But the worries were not that intense — until Haley’s illness. After that, the intrusive thoughts and images got worse, horrific scenes in which he imagines himself as bystander or thwarted rescuer. “I’ll be driving next to a semi tractor-trailer truck and all of a sudden I will picture someone getting crushed by the wheel,” he said. “It’s usually an older lady or a kid. You get them out from under the truck, but it doesn’t stop. I’m in the emergency room, trying to help. I’m at the funeral. Then very easily, the tears come.”
Mr. Abaspour said he sometimes pictured Haley “getting lost somewhere, or someone’s going to hurt her. I’m involved and trying to get the guy who did it to stop. Sometimes I kill him. Sometimes it doesn’t get that far.”
Other times, he said, he imagines his death, seeing his family “at the funeral home and I’m laying there. I try to see what’s going on at home, how Meggie’s reacting to my death, how Haley’s reacting, what Christine is going through.”
He rehashes things Haley has said, like wanting to “start over” or her question: “When I get really old, can I come back home? Will you be there?”
He wonders if his worrying laid genetic groundwork for Haley’s illness, “if I’m the cause of what Haley’s going through.”
Until recently, Mr. Abaspour, who also has trouble sleeping, told no one about his agonizing thoughts, not even his wife.
“I didn’t want to burden her,” he said. “I can handle it. So what if I’m driving to work and I cry? So what if I only sleep for four hours?”
But last spring, the family’s therapist noticed “I had certain problems,” he recalled. She encouraged him to tell his wife whenever he had disturbing thoughts. Mr. Abaspour said he hoped that confronting his own anxiety would help “get to the bottom of what Haley’s going through.”
He added, “It doesn’t matter for me, but for Haley.”
Families once kept illnesses like Haley’s quiet, afraid of being shunned or disparaged.
Public acceptance has grown, but some misperceptions and prejudice remain, and families feel conflicted: they want people to understand so the child can get appropriate help, but they also fear that Haley will be mocked or ostracized.
“If they keep it a secret then they’re bad parents,” Dr. Elliott said. “If they start spewing diagnoses, they’re subject to criticism because they’re not taking responsibility, just laying it on the illness. Or they’re social pariahs because there are some people who think that mental illness is contagious.”
Like other families, the Abaspours sometimes hesitate to publicly label their daughter mentally ill. But they also want people to know, and they get frustrated if people do not fully accept or understand it, or see her symptoms “as a manipulative thing, or they feel like they can fix it themselves, maybe by distracting her,” Ms. Abaspour said.
Her own family now understands and is very supportive, but it took some convincing, she said.
“My mother would say, ‘She’ll be fine, she’ll be fine, there’s nothing wrong with her,’ ” Ms. Abaspour said. “My sister says, ‘Well, she didn’t act like that when she was over here.’ ”
Mr. Abaspour has not told most of his family, who live in England, because they might worry excessively or not understand.
He told his sister, but “she was like I was when I first encountered the situation — disbelief or denial,” he said. His sister, he said, has not told her husband or her 20-year-old son, which created an odd atmosphere when they visited the Abaspours in August. “When Haley did have one of her little episodes, they were all like, ‘oh, oh,’ and they wondered why we weren’t running over to her,” Ms. Abaspour said. “I would like to talk to them more about it. If she had diabetes, they’d know she had diabetes.”
When, after reading a book for children with bipolar disorder, Haley said, “I can’t wait to go to school and tell everybody I’m bipolar,” the Abaspours were torn.
They discouraged her from announcing the diagnosis. But Haley did tell her classmates, “ ‘I have a lot of noise going on in my head and sometimes I feel anxious and sometimes I have to take a walk.’ ”
Some day, the Abaspours hope, Haley will have more effective drugs and better coping skills, and society will be more tolerant, so she can lead an independent life. But they have no illusions.
“This is not going away,” Ms. Abaspour said. Not for Haley or her family. “The overflow of what Haley has is what has made all of us what we are today.”
Two Documentary Films on Suicide
Dennis Lim, New York Times- 10/22/2006
Steve Irwin,
the Crocodile Hunter, who perished last month of a stingray stab, once declared, “If I’m going to die, I want it filmed.” (He got his wish.) It’s doubtful that any of the two dozen people who jumped to their deaths off the Golden Gate Bridge in 2004 ever issued such a request, but they were filmed all the same. Some of them are the unwitting stars of a disturbing documentary called “The Bridge.” Having drawn both fire and praise when it screened at the Tribeca Film Festival and the San Francisco International Film Festival last spring, it opens at the IFC Center this Friday.
Aiming to chronicle a year in the life of a suicide magnet, the film’s director, Eric Steel, and his crew embarked on a marathon deathwatch: they staked out the bridge from sunrise to sunset every day from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31. A few cameras were fixed; others were continuously manned and fitted with telephoto lenses. With some of the suicides that made it into the film — which inserts this harrowing footage amid interviews with friends and family of the deceased — the camera jerks downward, following the jumper along the four-second, 250-foot fall.
“It’s indescribably difficult to watch someone die,” Mr. Steel said in a recent interview. But he added that “The Bridge” was his attempt to raise awareness about suicide prevention: “It’s a way of getting you to witness something that’s a really terrible problem.”
Another new documentary, while also focused on suicide, takes an altogether calmer look at a very different kind of death. “Exit” (opening at Film Forum this Wednesday) details the operations of the Exit Society, which facilitates assisted suicides for the terminally ill in Switzerland. The film, directed by Fernand Melgar, concludes with one such “self-deliverance.”
“I had promised myself not to film last moments,” Mr. Melgar said in an e-mail message, but he changed his mind after observing the bond between patients and their volunteer “guides.” He set ground rules with his cinematographer: “We agreed to film the person’s face just until they took the potion. What happened next was intimate, and it was not our place to shoot it.”
“Exit” recalls Allan King’s “Dying at Grace” (2003), an equally steely and compassionate portrait of terminal illness. With their consent, Mr. King closely monitored five patients at a palliative care ward in Toronto through their final months — in some cases, up until their final breaths.
Needless to say, “The Bridge” would not be nearly as powerful with its horrors merely recounted or otherwise occluded. But what is the nature of that power?
Mr. Steel said he called the authorities every time he saw someone climb the guardrail, and as a result might have saved six lives. “The Bridge” has helped the campaign for a suicide barrier, although as reported in The New York Times in August, authorities believe that local news media attention on the film has led to an increase in suicides and suicide attempts.
The ethical responsibilities of spectatorship are front and center when it comes to images of real death. Whether or not it intends to, “The Bridge,” with its unblinking and arguably invasive camera, forces the viewer into the position of a voyeur.
“I sat there for a year and watched this,” Mr. Steel said. “That’s the experience I wanted to share.” He said he hoped the combination of the bridge scenes and the family testimonials would lead to a greater understanding of “what led these people to that spot.”
But empathy is a curious and perhaps elusive intent for any film that flirts with snuff. Mr. Steel’s camera, helplessly and safely parked on dry land a good mile from the jumpers, illustrates the problem: the gulf between the living and the dying can never be bridged.
Women on the Verge of a Very Finnish, Somewhat Cubist Breakdown
Paula Deitz, New York Times- 10/22/2006
International reputations and travels aside, artists typically rely on the solitude of a private studio to cultivate and execute their creative efforts. For the Finnish visual artist and filmmaker Eija-Liisa Ahtila, this is a fifth-floor loft studio in the old Kaapeli cable factory, overlooking an inlet of this watery city. Guarding the door behind a low wire barrier is her Catalonian shepherd, Harrison, recognizable as the same shaggy and endearing breed as Luca, an earlier pet whose death is featured in Ms. Ahtila’s 2005 installation film “The Hour of Prayer.” That four-screen dramatic film is the only work among her “human dramas,” as she calls them, that is autobiographical. It was shown this year at the National Museum Wales in Cardiff, where in March Ms. Ahtila won the Artes Mundi international prize (about $74,000) for contemporary art with a human context. In April, her film “Ground Control,” about extraterrestrial contact, was viewed by 400,000 people a day on four billboard-size screens installed in busy sections of Tokyo.
This week Ms. Ahtila is coming to New York for Wednesday’s opening of her 14-minute film installation “The Wind” at the Museum of Modern Art. It will be accompanied by showings of her related feature-length film, “Love Is a Treasure.”
Sitting in her pristine studio here, which adjoins Crystal Eye, the film production company of her husband, Ilppo Pohjola, Ms. Ahtila described her medium as “moving images of stories that have already happened.”
She is primarily a fiction writer who draws on the world of human psychosis, mainly female, to transform individual case studies of mental illness into an imaginary dream world. By breaking the logical sequence of the narration, she introduces a Cubist interpretation of events that emphasizes perception over causality.
A no-nonsense woman of 47, dressed casually in jeans, a brown sweater and black running shoes, Ms. Ahtila is surrounded in her studio by warehouse shelving with neat upright file boxes and the kind of Finnish modern design elements — bright orange and red couches, a sleek water pitcher and glasses — that make visits to Helsinki so visually satisfying. Between films, she concentrates on serial photography; her current subject is women and Christian iconography. A Fra Angelico poster hanging on her studio wall states: “And every woman will be a walking synthesis of the universe.”
Ms. Ahtila views her film work more as theater than cinema, a new art that sets a stylized stage for fiction. Working in close collaboration with her cast, she often finds that an actor’s interpretation will improve her original concept of a character. During full production, script pages are pinned to the studio wall and she depends on a crew — cinematographer, set and prop designers, lighting and sound specialists, wardrobe and makeup people — for the technical and visual quality of her films.
But when she visited New York in January 2005, it was without a script or film crew, and the city was engulfed in a major snowstorm. She filmed the streets at night herself from her hotel window in Chelsea and around Madison Square Park, capturing the same enticing luminosity as that of a winter night in Helsinki. Thus began a chain of events — “a string of pearls,” she calls it — that became “The Hour of Prayer.” The film tells the story of Luca’s death from bone cancer, but is really about the stillness and emptiness of grief and the loss of what Ms. Ahtila calls “sensory surroundings.”
From those early scenes of New York, the film cuts to the winter landscape of her country cottage on a Finnish lake. It is evident when one views this landscape of icy waters against dense forests, shot as a still life and given greater depth by the zigzag configuration of rectangular screens, that her art belongs as much to the tradition of Finnish landscape painting from the early 20th century as to the world of film. (She began her art studies in Helsinki, rebelling against the prevailing abstract tradition, before studying film in London and Los Angeles.)
“Watching the darkness and cold energy of water, especially under the stars on an autumn night, has taught me how to understand space and the element of time,” she said, “and from this space come the words.” For her, landscape precedes the narrative. Most of her films are in Finnish with English subtitles, though “The Hour of Prayer” is spoken in English by a Finnish actor.
Though her gallery installations are close to the feature-length film versions she makes, their multiple screens provide more visual material from different perspectives. Ms. Ahtila’s specifications include directions for designing the galleries in which the installations are shown. For her film “The House,” which was also shown in Cardiff, the screens were framed in red, blue and green, and the gallery incorporated loose plywood boards set against the walls — tokens of both physical and mental deconstruction.
In “The House,” the character Elisa drives to her country house, in a lush woodland setting, and first describes realistically her surroundings and imaginatively appointed rooms. Then everything falls apart.
“I think the living room or my house is breaking down,” she says, alarmed by hearing her car (shown in miniature) driving across the living room wall. “I can’t keep things out anymore, can’t preserve its own space.” As disassociated noises impinge on the interior, she finds herself floating among the treetops. After she blocks out the windows with black curtains, a cacophony of urban sounds overtakes her psyche, along with an image of a passenger ship disembarking refugees, symbolic of displacement.
For those who recall watching Ingmar Bergman’s “Persona” with anxiety as two women played out their psychological struggle at a seaside house, Ms. Ahtila’s films, though unsettling in subject matter, have the opposite effect. By drawing viewers into the spatial region of the film, they evoke empathy and even intimacy.
“As a visual artist, Ahtila best captures in these films the slippery intersection between fantasy and reality,” said Laurence Kardish, senior curator of film and media at the Museum of Modern Art. He selected “The Wind” for the MoMA show, he said, for its cinematic appeal and because it was the one that spoke to him most directly.
In addition to “The Wind,” the museum will show Ms. Ahtila’s recent feature film “Love Is a Treasure,” which it acquired for its permanent collection. It is a composite of five stories about women, featuring “Ground Control,” “The Wind” and “The House.” Throughout the film, local scenes of contemporary Finnish architecture, port activity and aerial highway views figure prominently.
For the installation of “The Wind,” the Modern is painting the gallery Ms. Ahtila’s specified lipstick red (Pantone 186C), which offsets the film’s bluish palette and fierce red accents. In a chaotic interior further disarranged by a turbulent wind, the dysfunctional Susanna, a somewhat overweight, inveterate hand-biter, recites her woes, insecurities and disappointments: “I never thought I would end up seeing a psychiatrist. I thought rather that I would become a psychiatrist myself.”
Susanna finds threatening the three real or imagined lithe girls who enter her space, which she systematically destroys through escalating self-destructive acts. The action takes place under the watchful eye of a blowfish that Ms. Ahtila and her set designer discovered in a Thai restaurant in Helsiniki.
Still, when Susanna overturns a bookcase, spilling its contents, the viewer may share a moment of satisfaction. And who will not identify with her piles of unread newspapers, which a male friend comes over to iron “so the black won’t rub off on my fingers”?
In another scene, Susanna opens and lines up all her (phallic) lipsticks and crushes them with a board. There are bits on politics, social issues, education and much else besides, all in an action-packed 14 minutes.
Summing up Ms. Ahtila’s achievement in portraying this debilitating aspect of the human condition, Mr. Kardish said, “She translates that moment when the mind, under severe emotional stress, liberates itself from actuality.”
FDA Gives OK for Schizophrenia Treatment
Associated Press, 10/23/2006
LONDON -- AstraZeneca PLC said Monday that it has received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for a new formulation of its popular Seroquel schizophrenia treatment, making it the first medicine to treat both the manic and depressive sides of bipolar disorder.
Seroquel, launched by the Anglo-Swedish company in 1997, is already used to treat acute manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. The FDA approval adds the treatment of patients with depressive episodes.
Seroquel is one of AstraZeneca's top-selling drugs, with total sales of $2.8 billion last year. The company has filed for similar regulatory approval in Canada and the European Union.
''Treating acute bipolar disorder with a single medication may help patients adhere to their medication regimen,'' said John Patterson, executive director of development for AstraZeneca.
About 7 million adult Americans have bipolar disorder, a condition that strikes people in their teens and late 20s and causes episodes of mania and depression.
Previous anti-psychotic drugs had side effects giving patients tremors and restlessness. Newer drugs such as Seroquel, Eli Lilly & Co.'s Zyprexa, Johnson & Johnson's Risperdal and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.'s Abilify are intended to have fewer side effects and dominate a market worth around $16.2 billion.
The FDA decision to approve the new treatment in the United States was based on an eight-week study of 1,045 patients with bipolar depression.
Patients were randomly assigned to take Seroquel or a placebo containing no medicine. Those taking Seroquel showed greater improvement in bipolar depression symptoms, overall quality of life, and satisfaction related to functioning, the company said.
The new formulation involves a once-daily dose of the treatment. The current immediate-release formula tablets are approved for dosing two to three times a day.
AstraZeneca shares were 0.3 percent higher at 3,516 pence ($65.83) on the London Stock Exchange.
A Darker Cloud Over Smokers
Susan Brink, Los Angeles Times- 10/23/2006
Lung cancer. Heart disease. Stroke. Premature infants. Just when you think the news about smoking and health can't get any worse, it gets a little worse.
Researchers in Denmark have found that the lifetime risk of developing a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, such as bronchitis or emphysema, is significantly higher than was previously thought. Through the Copenhagen City Heart Study, which began in 1976 and is ongoing, researchers have been studying more than 8,000 men and women between the ages of 30 and 60, focusing mainly on cardiovascular and pulmonary risk factors. No other study has looked at lung function in smokers for that long."Our study shows a lifetime risk of at least 25%. One in four smokers develops COPD," says Dr. Peter Lange of the department of cardiology and respiratory medicine at Hvidovre Hospital in Denmark and an author of the study published last week in the online journal Thorax. "Previously, we thought that the absolute risk was about 15%." People who have never smoked have a less than 5% risk of COPD, according to the study. Add up all the disease risks quantified so far, and about half of continual smokers will die of a smoking-related illness, losing an average of six to 10 years of their life spans, Lange says.
The study doesn't differentiate between heavy and light smokers. Researchers divided people according to the date they quit within a 25-year period. The longer a person had not smoked, the lower his or her risk.
But quitting even after many years has immediate benefits. "There is a cessation of symptoms like cough and phlegm production and a lower risk of chest infections," Lange says.
But there's no getting back what has been lost. "If the lung function is reduced at the time of quitting, it will not return to normal," Lange says. Still, when a smoker stops, the lungs begin to age naturally from that point on.
One of the first studies to examine the effect of smoking cessation programs on mortality, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine on Feb. 15, 2005, followed 5,887 middle-aged people for more than 14 years. Those who quit reduced significantly their risks of lung cancer, heart disease and respiratory disease.
"Stopping smoking means the damage to the lungs stops," Lange says.
As the Denmark study continues to monitor the lungs of people who keep smoking — and keep living — it appears that respiratory failure gets more likely over time, according to an accompanying editorial by Dr. Nicholas Anthonisen of the University of Manitoba Respiratory Hospital, and author of the 2005 mortality study. He writes: "An argument can be made that many (perhaps most) smokers are 'susceptible' to COPD if they live long enough."
Death With a Plan and a Departure Date
Stephen Holden, New York Times- 10/25/2006
The focus of “Exit: The Right to Die,” Fernand Melgar’s earnest documentary about assisted suicide, is so narrow that the movie plays like a stodgy promotional film for the Swiss organization Exit A.D.M.D., which helps terminally ill patients end their own lives.
Exit, based in Geneva, has 10,000 members, of whom, we’re told, the youngest is 21 and the oldest 103. It has more requests for help than it can accommodate. Switzerland is one of only a handful of countries worldwide to allow assisted suicide. In the United States only Oregon permits it.
To watch this somber movie is like visiting a funeral home and being bombarded with the soothing voices of salesmen spouting euphemisms that obscure the fact of death as surely as the scent of lilies obscures its smell. Suicide becomes “self-deliverance.” Volunteers who provide the terminally ill with a fatal cocktail of barbiturates and who remain with them during their final minutes are “escorts.”
The movie concentrates on escort-patient relationships in which the volunteer escorts interview applicants and help those who are accepted prepare and sign a statement of intent and choose a departure date. In the movie’s view, these volunteers are heroic men and women who, at enormous psychic cost to themselves, befriend their clients and rescue them from unbearable pain and suffering.
Great care is taken to make sure that the dying, many of whom suffer from cancer and multiple sclerosis, are unwavering in their wish.
The organization is strict about whom it will help. Those with severe depression are turned away unless that depression is connected with a terminal illness. Only Swiss residents are eligible because there is the fear that if Exit accepted people from other countries, Switzerland might become a mecca for euthanasia tourism.
At one organizational meeting, members debate the request of a couple, both 82, who wish to die together, although only one is ill; as much as the members sympathize with the couple, that request is denied.
The focus of “Exit: The Right to Die” is so limited that the movie never broaches the religious issues surrounding assisted suicide. And it touches on the legal issues only tangentially.
The potential for abuse, should legally assisted suicide become widespread, isn’t addressed, although it is easy to imagine any number of situations that are not as clear as the movie’s case studies.
Although Exit is connected to a worldwide network of organizations in the movement for the right to die with dignity, that movement is mentioned only in passing.
The film begins with an escort’s visit to a dying woman named Micheline who signs a declaration of intent. In the final scene it returns to her home to observe the final ritual. Despite the humanity and courage exhibited by the members of Exit, the film is inescapably grim.
The Right to Die
Written (in French, with English subtitles) and directed by Fernand Melgar; directors of photography, Camille Cottagnoud and Stefan Bossert; edited by Karine Sudan; produced by Mr. Melgar and Jean-Marc and Mathieu Henchoz; released by First Run/Icarus Films.
Tougher Screenings Sought For Troops' Mental Health
Lisa Chedekel & Matthew Kauffman, Hartford Courant- 10/26/2006
Policy reforms that have been signed into law by President Bush will enhance the mental health care of combat troops, but more improvements are needed as the pace of deployments accelerates, lawmakers and veterans' advocates say.
U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., a co-sponsor of the mental health reforms that were signed by the president last week, said she already has begun pushing a Defense Department task force to further tighten psychological screening and treatment of deployed troops.
"I'm glad we have a task force looking at these issues," Boxer said. "I hope they'll be the back-up" to restore some provisions that were stripped from the new legislation.
Boxer teamed with U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., to sponsor a bill calling on the military to set clear mental-fitness guidelines for deployment, and to enhance mental health screenings of troops heading to war, which now consist of a question on a form. The legislation grew out of a May series in The Courant that found that the military was sending mentally troubled troops into Iraq and keeping them there, in some cases with fatal consequences.
"We drafted this amendment with the intent of sparing soldiers and their families from the tragedy that poor mental health care imparts," Lieberman said. He said the legislation was an important step toward improving care.
But while the final bill calls on the military to tighten procedures for screening and monitoring troubled troops, some provisions were dropped from the Senate version by a conference committee of House and Senate negotiators. The approved legislation requires the military to establish guidelines governing when deploying or returning troops should be referred for mental health evaluations, and expands pre-deployment screenings to include "an assessment of the current treatment of the member and any use of psychotropic medications."
The law also requires the military to develop a list of specific mental health conditions or treatments that would preclude deployment to a combat zone.
Dropped from the original version were requirements that any service member who indicated a mental health problem during the screening be referred to a specialist for evaluation, and that the screenings include "a mental health history" of each member.
Boxer said that while the new law makes important changes, she was disappointed that the original bill had been "weakened" in the conference committee. She met last week with members of the Defense Department's mental health task force and encouraged them to go further in recommending reforms.
"I told them how important their work is ... and I said I hoped they'd take a look at restoring some of [the original bill]," she said. With many troops now on second or third combat tours in Iraq, she added, "We want to make sure there's a clear set of requirements before you send someone out. Also, we want mental health professionals looking at those people" who indicate problems.
Dr. William Winkenwerder, assistant secretary of defense for health affairs, was "still in the process of reviewing the legislation" and would comment on it in the near future, said Cynthia Smith, a spokeswoman for his office.
The mental health task force, which will issue recommendations next May, is looking into a number of issues, including whether pre- and post-deployment screenings are adequate. At a meeting last month in Texas, the task force heard complaints from soldiers about the stigma associated with reporting psychological problems to superiors, and concerns from an Army psychiatrist about "burnout" among mental health providers serving in Iraq.
Army Surgeon General Kevin C. Kiley, the task force co-chairman, said during the meeting that the task force wants to find ways to encourage more troops to seek care.
"It certainly starts from the top, in terms of creating the atmosphere," Kiley said, according to a meeting transcript.
Veterans' advocates called the new law a good first step, but said the federal government is still unwilling to support comprehensive mental-health screening and treatment.
"It's not everything we wanted," said Stephen Robinson, director of government relations for Veterans for America. "In order for [the Defense Department] to meet what we believe is the same requirement that they would utilize for, let's say, a piece of equipment, we would have to increase the number of mental health care professionals in the Department of Defense. And that costs a lot of money."
Paul Rieckhoff, executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said that while more improvements are needed, he was surprised at the passage of any law that might reduce the number of troops that can be deployed.
"What we're also wrestling with here is the overextension of the military," Rieckhoff said
Online Gamblers Slowed, Not Stopped
Adam Goldman, Associated Press- 10/26/2006
NEW YORK - Gamblers may look over their shoulder now, but experts say a new Internet gambling ban won't keep bettors from ponying up, just turn them on to overseas payment services out of the law's reach. "It has put a terrible scare into people," said I. Nelson Rose, who teaches gambling law at Whittier Law School in Costa Mesa, Calif. `But it won't by any means wipe out Internet gambling."
The fright swept through the $12 billion industry on the heels of the recent arrests of two gambling company executives and a new law President Bush signed Oct. 13 that seeks to ban most online gambling and criminalizes funds transfers. The law has wiped out billions of dollars in shareholder value of British companies, leaving the industry's future in doubt as U.S. lawmakers initially trumpeted they had found a way to halt bets coming from America.
But serious questions remain about whether the legislation can be effective in stopping U.S. residents from playing poker or betting on sports. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act goes after the money, not the millions of players, which would be nearly impossible to enforce. It will essentially try to choke off the way Americans fund their gambling habits, hoping to prevent the transfer of dollars to the popular Internet sites.
It's also widely understood that the law has online poker in its gun sights, identifying it as a game of chance -- something the poker companies dispute. They believe poker is a game of skill and therefore not subject to the new rules. They're fearful nonetheless. "Their mission is to kill the funding of online poker, and that's what this law does," said Mike Sexton, who hosts the popular World Poker Tour and has won millions as a professional player.
The new law comes amid an explosion in online, gambling, fueled by the Texas Hold 'em craze and widespread access to the Internet. In addition, dozens of Web sites have sprouted up that allow any gambler with a credit card to bet on any sport they choose, for any amount of money they want.
Industry experts say there are an estimated 2,000 Internet sites that take bets for sports and poker. American players have fueled Internet gambling, supplying $6 .billion of the $12 billion in revenues generated annually. "The time has been one of rapid growth," said Sebastian Sinclair, president of Christiansen Capital Advisors, a gambling consultant. "This industry was well on its way to becoming mainstream in a great part of the world. Capital was tripping over itself to fund these companies."
The new law gives the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve, along with the Attorney General, 270 days to establish policies and procedures. "The regulations are clearly going to prevent banks from doing electronic fund transfers to gambling sites, but that is no big deal," Rose said. Clamping down on the banks won't serve as a panacea, Rose said. In some cases, banks simply move the money to payment processors, known as e-wallets. Non-U.S. payment processors such as the widely used Neteller then transfer the money to the Internet gambling sites.
The U.S. government has no authority over processors like Neteller that are operating legally.
Anthony Cabot, a well-known gambling lawyer in Las Vegas, thinks language used in the bill provides a loophole for the payment processors and the U.S. banks that want to be free to do business with them. "Unless you have some fairly Draconian measures ... the likelihood of stopping payment to them is small," Cabot said.
Much damage has already been done to the offshore sports betting industry without the looming regulations. British BetOnSports PLC folded after its chief executive was arrested in July by U.S. authorities. David Carruthers faces 22 counts of fraud and racketeering charges and remains under house arrest in the St. Louis area. London-based Sportingbet's chairman was detained last month in New York on a state fugitive warrant charging him with illegal online gambling. He was eventually freed. Both arrests sounded serious alarm bells for those running sports wagering sites that take American bets.
The new legislation was meant to clarify the 1961 Wire Act, explicitly outlawing Internet gambling, including online poker. It creates new criminal penalties, which have rattled investors and executives -- although Rose said it doesn't expand the act, and there's no indication the Justice Department is about to launch a huge campaign to enforce the law.
Fight Against Smoking Stalls
Rob Stein, Washington Post- 10/26/2006
WASHINGTON - The battle against tobacco in the United Mates appears to have stalled, with the number of adults who smoke cigarettes hitting a plateau after declining steadily for tight years, federal health officials reported Thursday.
The proportion of adults who smoke held steady at 20.9 percent in the most recent national survey of cigarette habits, conducted in 2005. It was the first time the rate did not fall from one year to the next since 1997, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta reported.
The stall coincides with a similar leveling-off in smoking rates among teen-agers, suggesting that the steady progress against the leading cause of preventable death has hit a wall.
Health officials blamed the trend on a combination of factors, including states cutting back on anti-smoking programs, the price of cigarettes rising more slowly and increased advertising by tobacco companies. "Cigarette smoking is still the major cause of preventable death in this country," said Ann Malarcher of the CDC's Office on Smoking and Health. *We're not making the progress we need to make in terms of preventing smoking: related illness and death."
The new numbers were met with alarm by public health advocates and anti-smoking activists, who noted that smoking-related illnesses hit more than 400,000 Americans each year. "This is very disturbing," said Erika Schlachter of the American Lung Association. "We know what it takes to reduce smoking rates, but we as a country have not yet done that."
The proportion of adults who smoke had dropped every year, since 1997, when the rate was 24.7 percent. That stopped in 2005, according to the 2005 National Health Interview Survey,
which involved face-to-face interviews with a representative sample of 31,428 people age 18 and older. The survey found that 20.9 percent of adults - or 45.1 million Americans - are smokers, which is the same as in 2004, according to a report in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
A second report found that smoking rates varied widely around the country, from a high of 28.7 percent in Kentucky to a low of 11.5 percent in Utah. Nationally, men are still more likely to smoke than women -- 23.9 vs. 18.1 percent American Indians and Alaskan Natives had the highest rate at 32.0 percent, followed by whites (21.9 percent) and blacks (21.5 percent).
One reason for the stall in the decline in smoking is that the amount of money being spent on anti-smoking campaigns has fallen 26.5 percent from 2002 to 2006, the CDC said. States are using money from a landmark $246 billion settlement with the tobacco industry for other purposes. "A lot of the most effective programs got wiped and cut back," said Joseph DiFranza, a smoking researcher at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester. At the same time,. tobacco industry spending on advertising and promotional activities, including price cuts, more than doubled, from $6.7 billion in 1998 to $15.1 billion in 2003, the CDC said.
Options to Banish Phobias
Vikki Conwell, Cox News Service- 10/26/2006
ATLANTA - Time (and her family) flew right by as Kathy Heart kept her feet planted firmly on the ground. "I told myself that I could fly anytime I wanted to, but I just didn't want to," said the Atlanta woman, who did not see her relatives in New Jersey for 20 years. "Then I had to realize that I really couldn't."
The irrational, uncontrollable fear of certain situations, places or objects, coupled with physiological reactions such as intense breathing, pounding heart and sweating, paralyzes about 6.3 million people in the United States. Phobias can disrupt daily routines and alter lives as sufferers avoid the triggers, which include:
• Animals. The most common specific phobias include dogs, snakes, insects or mice.
• Situations such as flying, riding in a car or on public transportation, driving, going over bridges or in tunnels or being in a closed-in place.
* Natural environment such as storms, heights or water.
* Blood, injection, injury. These involve a fear of being injured, of seeing blood or of invasive medical procedures, such as blood tests or injections.
Other phobias include. fear of falling down, a fear of loud sounds and a fear, of costumed characters such as clowns. "Perfectly high-functioning, rational people can have an irrational fear of something," says Jeannie Ingram, a licensed counselor with Decatur Psychotherapy Group. The key is not to let the phobia take over your life, she says.
A rational fear of snakes is healthy, says Raymond Crowel of the National Mental Health Association, referring to someone walking in the woods or working in their yard. "But if you're on a city street downtown looking for snakes, that's a preoccupation and a phobia," he says.
While some phobias develop during childhood, most occur during adolescence and early adulthood in response to a stressful event associated with a place or object.
One day during church, Terrie McSorley felt like the walls were caving in around her. Her heart began to race, her palms became sweaty, and she could not catch her breath. Panicked, McSorley hurried to the back of the sanctuary for relief. The anxiety dissipated but returned each time she entered the building. Eventually, McSorley stopped attending service, and within two years, her fears had escalated to where she could not leave home without a companion. "I was not living my life; I was just surviving," says the mother of six, who later sought treatment with a psychologist. Now, "I can do everything that I want and need to do."
Common fears
* Arachnophobia. Fear off spiders. (Half of women and 10 percent of men have a fear of spiders.)
• Aviophobia. Fear of flying. .
* Agoraphobia. Hear of any place or situation where escape might be difficult or help unavailable.. .
* Claustrophobia. Fear of being trapped in confined spaces.
* Acrophobia. Fear of heights.
* Brontophobia. Fear of thunder.
* Necrophobia. Fear of death or dead things.
Treatment options
Phobias are highly treatable, said Rebecca Beaton, director of the Anxiety &. Stress ' Management Institute in Atlanta. Here are some treatment options:
• Cognitive-behavior therapy. Irrational beliefs are addressed as clients think through situations. and draw conclusions based on facts. They use reapsuring words, such as "I can do this," "Anxiety is normal, and it will pass," or "I've made negative predictions before, and nothing bad has happened." Clients construct a hierarchy of fears from least to greatest and are gradually exposed to what frightens them (starting with an imagined or virtual setting and moving into the real environment) until fears diminish. Prolonged exposure desensitizes.clients to feared objects or situations as self-talk helps work through them.
* Meditation/deep breathing. Slow, deep, abdominal breaths reduce the production of stress hormones such as adrenaline and cortisol and reduce blood pressure and heart rate. Anxiety is tied to a physical response, so the body cannot be anxious when it is relaxed.
* Workbooks raise awareness of the origin of fears, introduce the concept of rational self-talk and typically include a journal.
• Support groups help to remove isolation and should be facilitated by a therapist.
* Medications. For shortterm treatment, low doses of tranquilizers such as Valium and Xanax may be prescribed. They can be very addictive and should be used sparingly. For more generalized anxiety selective serotonin reuptake. inhibitors (such as Lexipro, Zoloft or Paxil) or selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors may be effective.
Relaxation guide
Practice these techniques so that when you're in an uncomfortable situation, you can use these to relieve your anxiety.
1. Sit in a comfortable chair or lie down on a flat surface;
2. Place one hand on your stomach, just above your navel. Place the other hand on your chest.
3. Breathe in slowly and try to make your stomach rise a little.
4. Hold your breath for I one second.
5. Breathe out slowly and let your stomach go back down. Make your exhalation slower and longer than your inhalation.
6. Do this for five to 10 minutes.
Source: Raymond Crowel, National Mental Health Association
Virtual reality
The latest advancement in treating phobias employs videogame technology to gradually expose patients to their fears while helping them talk about and cope with their experiences. Virtual reality -- simulated, three-dimensional environments experienced through gogglelike video screens and earphones -- augments traditional therapy by creating realworld scenarios in a controlled setting.
"Instead of a clinician taking a client to a bridge to look out over the bridge, we can bring the bridge to the client," said Ken Graap, president and chief executive of Virtually Better, an Atlanta company that builds and markets virtual reality systems to treat phobias of heights, public speaking, storms and flying. During sessions, clinicians can manipulate and repeat scenarios based on the client's anxiety level. "The only way to overcome any fear is to face it," Graap said. "Everything else is avoidance."
About eight hours of ' treatment, at an average cost of $160 an hour, is recommended to treat most phobias.
Do Children of Gay Parents Develop Differently?
Kevin Sack, Los Angeles Times- 10/30/2006
Despite three decades of research on gay parenting, social scientists cannot conclusively determine whether children raised by homosexuals develop differently, for better or worse, than those raised by heterosexuals.
Though the early consensus is that they do not, even the investigators acknowledge the field is too young, the numbers too few, the variables too many and the research too values-laden to qualify as definitive.
As gay marriage and parenting have moved to the forefront of national discourse, what has emerged, some experts say, is a political debate masked as a sociological one.
In 2001, Judith Stacey and Timothy J. Biblarz, then sociologists at the University of Southern California, published a review of 21 previous studies of the children of homosexual parents (most of them lesbians). Almost uniformly, they wrote, the research found no systematic differences between children reared by a mother and father and those raised by same-sex parents.
But Stacey and Biblarz also observed that researchers who found no differences sometimes skewed their interpretation of results to suit their own leanings. "Ideological pressures," they concluded, "constrain intellectual development in this field…. Because anti-gay scholars seek evidence of harm, sympathetic researchers defensively stress its absence."
Some studies, said Stacey, have ignored or downplayed early indications there may, in fact, be differences in the development of character and gender roles, among them that children of same-sex parents may be more open to homosexual experimentation.
"I think they'll be more tolerant, more flexible in terms of gender conformity," said Stacey, who now teaches at New York University. "The boys may be less aggressive. There's some indication the girls will have a wider array of career aspirations."
Charlotte J. Patterson, a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia and a prominent researcher in the field, has found that the purposefulness inherent in same-sex parenting tends to counter any societal disadvantages. "I think what we're seeing overall is pretty positive adjustment on the part of these kids," she said. "What that suggests, I think, is that we may have overrated the role of gender in parenting in our theoretical notions about these matters."
Over the last decade, that general proposition has been embraced, to varying degrees, by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Assn., the American Psychological Assn., the American Psychiatric Assn. and a variety of child welfare groups.
The psychological association holds that "the research has been remarkably consistent in showing that lesbian and gay parents are every bit as fit and capable as heterosexual parents, and their children are as psychologically healthy and well-adjusted as children reared by heterosexual parents."
The American Academy of Pediatrics, in a 2002 review of the literature, also found no negative effects. "Compared with heterosexual fathers, gay fathers have been described to adhere to stricter disciplinary guidelines, to place greater emphasis on guidance and the development of cognitive skills, and to be more involved in their children's activities," the group wrote.
Even social science articles that oppose same-sex parenting typically do not claim significant evidence of dire consequences for children.
Instead, opponents have argued that parenting by a mother and father is optimal, and that much of the existing research has been "compromised by methodological flaws and driven by political agendas," in the words of a 2005 Family Research Council report.
The report's author, Timothy J. Dailey, also said that "openly lesbian researchers" — he named Patterson specifically — "sometimes conduct research with an interest in portraying homosexual parenting in a positive light." To do so, Dailey wrote, ignores "the accumulated wisdom of cultures and societies from time immemorial, which testifies that the best way for children to be raised is by a mother and a father who are married to each other."
Both sides agree that large numbers of cases will need to be studied.
Those cases could become available in a generation or two. The 2000 Census found that 34% of female same-sex households included children under 18, an increase of 72% since 1990, and that 22% of male same-sex households included children, a quadrupling since 1990.
Time for ‘a Good Death’
Jane Brody, New York Times- 10/31/2006
As sudden deaths from heart attacks continue to decline and more people leave this life after a protracted illness, the concept of “a good death” has become ever more important to both the dying and those who survive them. But what is a good death, and is it really the same for everyone? And what are the consequences of different approaches to death for those left behind?
Nearly four decades ago, Dr. Elisabeth Kübler-Ross outlined what she recognized as five stages people go through after the diagnosis of an incurable illness: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and finally acceptance of their impending death. She recognized that people approaching the end of life might seesaw between the various stages, but that those who reached “acceptance” were most likely to die in peace with the least trauma to their survivors. Indeed, hospice care practically demands that people who are dying reach acceptance, since they must accept only comfort care and give up all treatments aimed at staving off their demise.
Still, there are many people who choose to continue fighting for life, leaving no therapeutic stone unturned, until they take their last breath. There are people who will not acknowledge that they have a fatal illness, remaining in denial even as their bodies shrink under the onslaught of disease. There are people who weather their medical storm in fury because they are being robbed of their future. There are people who cannot emerge from depression over the prospect of losing everyone they love.
Can these people, who never achieve acceptance, also have a good death? The answer seems to be yes, although the consequences for survivors may sometimes be less than desirable.
Nails Polished to the End
Dr. Joseph Sacco, a palliative care specialist at Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center in New York, tells about a patient, Mrs. Santana, in his book, “On His Own Terms,” the story of his father’s losing battle against lung cancer. Mrs. Santana had terminal cancer and was near death, but she never uttered the words “cancer” or “death.” During her final hospital stay, she maintained her lifelong elegance and dignity, polishing her nails, grooming her hair, always cheerful and calm, until the day she died.
Dr. Sacco’s father, Joe, on the other hand, kept insisting he would “beat this thing,” even as his breathing became ever more labored and his weight dropped by half. Though Dr. Sacco, based on his training, thought his father should come to accept his fate, he felt he had no choice but to humor the dying man and play along.
Joe’s death was peaceful enough, occurring as it did on his terms. But it took its toll on Dr. Sacco, who laments: “Had my father not been frozen by fear, he might have been able to talk openly and reaffirm his knowledge that his son really did love him. Instead, paralyzed by the implication that death was imminent, he brushed me aside with a wave of the hand and the comment that he wasn’t going to die.”
Dr. Greg A. Sachs’s father-in-law, Al, who also had lung cancer, chose to have no treatment for his disease and spent not one day of his remaining 18 months in the hospital. As Dr. Sachs told it in The Journal of the American Medical Association (Nov. 15, 2000), Al spent the year “straightening out files; reconciling accounts and labeling everything in the house, including fuse boxes and cabinet drawers, so that his wife would be able to find everything when he was gone.” According to an agreed-upon plan, Al died peacefully at home surrounded by his loving family, with his distressing end-of-life symptoms assuaged by morphine, anti-anxiety medication and oxygen.
No Easing Existential Suffering
But as Dr. Sachs tells it, Al’s equanimity about dying, his methodical preparations and his gentle demise did not ease the family’s pain as he lay dying, for they knew Al didn’t want to die and nobody in the family wanted to lose him.
Dr. Sachs explained that for survivors, “some of the suffering is existential or spiritual” and even the best end-of-life care cannot ease that kind of suffering.
He cautioned his fellow physicians against “painting too rosy a picture of end-of-life care” and creating unreasonable expectations of “spiritual growth” and “transcendence.”
But while no one is likely to rejoice at losing a loved one, having people die in accordance with their wishes is, in my experience, far less painful than the alternative, which all too often involves futile medical rescue efforts that patients do not want and that can get in the way of comforting end-of-life conversations and reconciliations.
When my mother-in-law’s cancer recurred four years after treatment, she chose, at 84, not to have anything done that might prolong her life. And no one dared to contradict this decision by a woman who had always lived life on her own terms and was determined to die that way.
A Chance to Say Goodbye
Living will in hand and fully in control of her faculties, she entered the hospital hemorrhaging, and at her request a “Do Not Resuscitate” notice was posted on her door. The family was called, and all had a chance to say goodbye unimpeded by machines, tubes and medical personnel. Twelve hours later, she was gone, leaving behind a sad but grateful family. Her minister, at her bedside until the end, said he had never before seen such a peaceful death.
Dr. Karen E. Steinhauser and colleagues at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Durham, N.C., examined the constituents of a good death for patients, their families and health care providers. The 85 study participants had no trouble describing a “bad death” — having inadequately treated pain while receiving aggressive but futile cure-directed therapy.
Patients felt disregarded, family members felt perplexed and concerned about suffering, and providers felt out of control and feared that they were not providing good care. Decisions not previously discussed usually had to be made during a crisis. Families unprepared for what happens when death is imminent often panicked and rushed the patient to the hospital, where last-ditch and usually futile attempts at resuscitation were made, when both patient and family would have preferred a home death.
The study identified six components of a good death, described in The Annals of Internal Medicine of May 16, 2000:
*Pain and symptom management. Pain, more so than dying itself, is too often the cause of acute anxiety among patients and their families.
*
Clear decision making. Patients want to have a say in treatment decisions.
*
Preparation for death. Patients want to know what to expect as their illness progresses and to plan for what will follow their deaths.
*
Completion. This includes reviewing one’s life, resolving conflicts, spending time with family and friends, and saying good-bye.
*
Contribution to others. Many people nearing death achieve a clarity as to what is really important in life and want to share that understanding with others.
*
Affirmation. Study participants emphasized the importance of being seen as a unique and whole person and being understood in the context of their lives, values and preferences.
This study says that dying can, and should, be a much less painful experience for many more people and their loved ones than it now is.
Children Need to Know What Their Peers Think of Them
Melissa Healy, Los Angeles Times- 10/31/2006
Truth sometimes hurts. But for children closing in on adolescence, a firm grasp on the truth about one's standing with classmates and peers can be healthy, even when it does hurt a bit.
A new study has found that children who can accurately assess how much — or little — their peers like them are less likely to develop symptoms of depression, including sadness and difficulties concentrating or sleeping. By comparison, children with unrealistically rosy or unfoundedly gloomy views of their standing appear more likely to be headed toward depression.
Many psychologists have speculated that the smiling child who believes she is the glowing sun in her classmates' universe will be protected from depression by that belief. They also surmised that the child who holds a negative view of his status among peers is more prone to maladjustment and depression.
That picture, says Florida State University psychologist Janet Kistner, may be a bit too simple. She and fellow researchers found that the child who is not regarded well by peers — and knows it — is actually less likely to grow more depressed over time than the child who believes that classmates like him when, in fact, they don't. The kid who can see that he is not so well-liked may be better able to change his behavior to make friends, Kistner says. The kid who's clueless about her effect on classmates may grow frustrated and sad as she misses social cues and fumbles gestures of friendship.
"Realistic perceptions," Kistner says, "are a hallmark of mental health."
The study is the latest in a welter of efforts to identify which children and adolescents may be at heightened risk for developing depression and mental illness.
Some politicians, public health officials, mental health activists and pharmaceutical companies have worked to establish mental-health screening programs in schools and the community. Those initiatives, including a model program designed at Columbia University called TeenScreen, aim to steer kids who are more likely to develop depression toward help before their emotional difficulties lead them to risky behaviors, academic failure or suicide attempts. In recent years, six states — Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Iowa and New Mexico — have moved to adopt programs that screen schoolchildren for warning signs of mental illness, including depression. Elsewhere, individual school districts have followed suit.
Those efforts have proven controversial. Many parents fear their children will be labeled as mentally ill and marked for special attention because they have expressed sentiments typical of adolescents. Others caution that there are few services and scant psychiatric help available for the millions of children that could be identified. And many suspect such screens are drug company-sponsored efforts to build the market for antidepressants.
Researchers and clinicians, meanwhile, say they are far from having developed accurate predictors of a child developing depression. The younger the child, the murkier the crystal ball.
Dr. Daniel Pine, chief of child and adolescent research at the National Institute of Mental Health's Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, says that the strongest signs that a child may develop depression are a personal history of anxiety in early life; a parent with past or current depression; and a childhood pattern of low-level depressive symptoms (sadness, difficulties with eating, sleeping or concentrating, loss of energy or interest in once-enjoyed activities).
Beyond those signals, Pine says, disruptions in peer and social relationships often come with depression. But whether those ruptures are the cause of a depressive episode or the result — or a little of both — is not known.
"There are a lot of unanswered questions," he says.
In the study, published in the latest issue of the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Kistner and fellow researchers at FSU surveyed 667 children in third, fourth and fifth grades, of average age a little over 9 years. Several weeks into the school year, each was shown a photographic roster of the class and asked to rate how well he liked each classmate and how much he believed each classmate liked him. The researchers compared classmates' opinions of a child with his own assessment of their regard.
During the same session, researchers asked students questions to measure their depressive symptoms. They found that those most inaccurate about their classmates' opinions of them were most likely to show increased signs of depression six months later.
Children who were widely disliked and who knew it were likely to have started the year with strong signs of depressed feelings. But as the year went on, most of their depressive symptoms either stayed the same or got a little better, although the researchers did not formally measure that relationship. They rarely got worse.
Among children younger than 8, Kistner cautions, inflated views of classmates' affection are commonplace, and should not be misread by parents as unhealthy. But as children enter the "'tween years" of puberty, they normally become more acute in their self-assessments.
Acuity in reading social signals varies widely among adults, and psychologists have observed that some never get much better than they were as pre-adolescents. In contrast to Kistner's findings with children, researchers have long noted that depressed adults are, in fact, more accurate judges of how well they perform tasks in experimental settings, a phenomenon known as "depressive realism."
"That's a really fascinating time," Kistner says — and potentially a moment when the course of a child's future mental health could be swayed. Both a child with an inflated sense of popularity and one with an overly dark view are probably sending and receiving faulty social signals, she says, and becoming frustrated that the world is not responding as the child expects.
"They may not be timing it right, they may be missing cues," she says — and some simple social skills counseling might help.
|